aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/f2fs/gc.h (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-09-05f2fs: optimize gc for better performanceJin Xu1-1/+1
This patch improves the gc efficiency by optimizing the victim selection policy. With this optimization, the random re-write performance could increase up to 20%. For f2fs, when disk is in shortage of free spaces, gc will selects dirty segments and moves valid blocks around for making more space available. The gc cost of a segment is determined by the valid blocks in the segment. The less the valid blocks, the higher the efficiency. The ideal victim segment is the one that has the most garbage blocks. Currently, it searches up to 20 dirty segments for a victim segment. The selected victim is not likely the best victim for gc when there are much more dirty segments. Why not searching more dirty segments for a better victim? The cost of searching dirty segments is negligible in comparison to moving blocks. In this patch, it enlarges the MAX_VICTIM_SEARCH to 4096 to make the search more aggressively for a possible better victim. Since it also applies to victim selection for SSR, it will likely improve the SSR efficiency as well. The test case is simple. It creates as many files until the disk full. The size for each file is 32KB. Then it writes as many as 100000 records of 4KB size to random offsets of random files in sync mode. The testing was done on a 2GB partition of a SDHC card. Let's see the test result of f2fs without and with the patch. --------------------------------------- 2GB partition, SDHC create 52023 files of size 32768 bytes random re-write 100000 records of 4KB --------------------------------------- | file creation (s) | rewrite time (s) | gc count | gc garbage blocks | [no patch] 341 4227 1174 174840 [patched] 324 2958 645 106682 It's obvious that, with the patch, f2fs finishes the test in 20+% less time than without the patch. And internally it does much less gc with higher efficiency than before. Since the performance improvement is related to gc, it might not be so obvious for other tests that do not trigger gc as often as this one ( This is because f2fs selects dirty segments for SSR use most of the time when free space is in shortage). The well-known iozone test tool was not used for benchmarking the patch becuase it seems do not have a test case that performs random re-write on a full disk. This patch is the revised version based on the suggestion from Jaegeuk Kim. Signed-off-by: Jin Xu <jinuxstyle@gmail.com> [Jaegeuk Kim: suggested simpler solution] Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
2013-08-06f2fs: add sysfs entries to select the gc policyNamjae Jeon1-0/+3
Add sysfs entry gc_idle to control the gc policy. Where gc_idle = 1 corresponds to selecting a cost benefit approach, while gc_idle = 2 corresponds to selecting a greedy approach to garbage collection. The selection is mutually exclusive one approach will work at any point. If gc_idle = 0, then this option is disabled. Cc: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Kumar <pankaj.km@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> [Jaegeuk Kim: change the select_gc_type() flow slightly] Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
2013-08-06f2fs: add sysfs support for controlling the gc_threadNamjae Jeon1-14/+19
Add sysfs entries to control the timing parameters for f2fs gc thread. Various Sysfs options introduced are: gc_min_sleep_time: Min Sleep time for GC in ms gc_max_sleep_time: Max Sleep time for GC in ms gc_no_gc_sleep_time: Default Sleep time for GC in ms Cc: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Kumar <pankaj.km@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> [Jaegeuk Kim: fix an umount bug and some minor changes] Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
2013-04-26f2fs: avoid frequent background GCJaegeuk Kim1-3/+9
If there is no victim segments selected by background GC, let's wait a little bit longer time to collect dirty segments. By default, let's give 5 minutes. Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
2013-02-12f2fs: clarify and enhance the f2fs_gc flowJaegeuk Kim1-16/+0
This patch makes clearer the ambiguous f2fs_gc flow as follows. 1. Remove intermediate checkpoint condition during f2fs_gc (i.e., should_do_checkpoint() and GC_BLOCKED) 2. Remove unnecessary return values of f2fs_gc because of #1. (i.e., GC_NODE, GC_OK, etc) 3. Simplify write_checkpoint() because of #2. 4. Clarify the main f2fs_gc flow. o monitor how many freed sections during one iteration of do_garbage_collect(). o do GC more without checkpoints if we can't get enough free sections. o do checkpoint once we've got enough free sections through forground GCs. 5. Adopt thread-logging (Slack-Space-Recycle) scheme more aggressively on data log types. See. get_ssr_segement() Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
2013-02-12f2fs: make an accessor to get sections for particular block typeNamjae Jeon1-6/+2
Introduce accessor to get the sections based upon the block type (node,dents...) and modify the functions : should_do_checkpoint, has_not_enough_free_secs to use this accessor function to get the node sections and dent sections. Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
2013-02-12f2fs: name gc task as per the block deviceNamjae Jeon1-1/+0
Currently GC task is started for each f2fs formatted/mounted device. But, when we check the task list, using 'ps', there is no distinguishing factor between the tasks. So, name the task as per the block device just like the flusher threads. Also, remove the macro GC_THREAD_NAME and instead use the name: f2fs_gc to avoid name length truncation, as the command length is 16 -> TASK_COMM_LEN 16 and example name like: f2fs_gc_task:8:16 -> this exceeds name length Before Patch for 2 F2FS formatted partitions: root 28061 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 10:31 0:00 [f2fs_gc_task] root 28087 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 10:32 0:00 [f2fs_gc_task] After Patch: root 16756 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 14:57 0:00 [f2fs_gc-8:18] root 16765 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 14:57 0:00 [f2fs_gc-8:19] Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
2012-12-11f2fs: adjust kernel coding styleJaegeuk Kim1-2/+2
As pointed out by Randy Dunlap, this patch removes all usage of "/**" for comment blocks. Instead, just use "/*". Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
2012-12-11f2fs: add garbage collection functionsJaegeuk Kim1-0/+117
This adds on-demand and background cleaning functions. - The basic background cleaning policy is trying to do cleaning jobs as much as possible whenever the system is idle. Once the background cleaning is done, the cleaner sleeps an amount of time not to interfere with VFS calls. The time is dynamically adjusted according to the status of whole segments, which is decreased when the following conditions are satisfied. . GC is not conducted currently, and . IO subsystem is idle by checking the number of requets in bdev's request list, and . There are enough dirty segments. Otherwise, the time is increased incrementally until to the maximum time. Note that, min and max times are 10 secs and 30 secs by default. - F2FS adopts a default victim selection policy where background cleaning uses a cost-benefit algorithm, while on-demand cleaning uses a greedy algorithm. - The method of moving data during the cleaning is slightly different between background and on-demand cleaning schemes. In the case of background cleaning, F2FS loads the data, and marks them as dirty. Then, F2FS expects that the data will be moved by flusher or VM. In the case of on-demand cleaning, F2FS should move the data right away. - In order to identify valid blocks in a victim segment, F2FS scans the bitmap of the segment managed as an SIT entry. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>