aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-06-21xfs: journal IO cache flush reductionsDave Chinner4-48/+43
Currently every journal IO is issued as REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA to guarantee the ordering requirements the journal has w.r.t. metadata writeback. THe two ordering constraints are: 1. we cannot overwrite metadata in the journal until we guarantee that the dirty metadata has been written back in place and is stable. 2. we cannot write back dirty metadata until it has been written to the journal and guaranteed to be stable (and hence recoverable) in the journal. The ordering guarantees of #1 are provided by REQ_PREFLUSH. This causes the journal IO to issue a cache flush and wait for it to complete before issuing the write IO to the journal. Hence all completed metadata IO is guaranteed to be stable before the journal overwrites the old metadata. The ordering guarantees of #2 are provided by the REQ_FUA, which ensures the journal writes do not complete until they are on stable storage. Hence by the time the last journal IO in a checkpoint completes, we know that the entire checkpoint is on stable storage and we can unpin the dirty metadata and allow it to be written back. This is the mechanism by which ordering was first implemented in XFS way back in 2002 by commit 95d97c36e5155075ba2eb22b17562cfcc53fcf96 ("Add support for drive write cache flushing") in the xfs-archive tree. A lot has changed since then, most notably we now use delayed logging to checkpoint the filesystem to the journal rather than write each individual transaction to the journal. Cache flushes on journal IO are necessary when individual transactions are wholly contained within a single iclog. However, CIL checkpoints are single transactions that typically span hundreds to thousands of individual journal writes, and so the requirements for device cache flushing have changed. That is, the ordering rules I state above apply to ordering of atomic transactions recorded in the journal, not to the journal IO itself. Hence we need to ensure metadata is stable before we start writing a new transaction to the journal (guarantee #1), and we need to ensure the entire transaction is stable in the journal before we start metadata writeback (guarantee #2). Hence we only need a REQ_PREFLUSH on the journal IO that starts a new journal transaction to provide #1, and it is not on any other journal IO done within the context of that journal transaction. The CIL checkpoint already issues a cache flush before it starts writing to the log, so we no longer need the iclog IO to issue a REQ_REFLUSH for us. Hence if XLOG_START_TRANS is passed to xlog_write(), we no longer need to mark the first iclog in the log write with REQ_PREFLUSH for this case. As an added bonus, this ordering mechanism works for both internal and external logs, meaning we can remove the explicit data device cache flushes from the iclog write code when using external logs. Given the new ordering semantics of commit records for the CIL, we need iclogs containing commit records to issue a REQ_PREFLUSH. We also require unmount records to do this. Hence for both XLOG_COMMIT_TRANS and XLOG_UNMOUNT_TRANS xlog_write() calls we need to mark the first iclog being written with REQ_PREFLUSH. For both commit records and unmount records, we also want them immediately on stable storage, so we want to also mark the iclogs that contain these records to be marked REQ_FUA. That means if a record is split across multiple iclogs, they are all marked REQ_FUA and not just the last one so that when the transaction is completed all the parts of the record are on stable storage. And for external logs, unmount records need a pre-write data device cache flush similar to the CIL checkpoint cache pre-flush as the internal iclog write code does not do this implicitly anymore. As an optimisation, when the commit record lands in the same iclog as the journal transaction starts, we don't need to wait for anything and can simply use REQ_FUA to provide guarantee #2. This means that for fsync() heavy workloads, the cache flush behaviour is completely unchanged and there is no degradation in performance as a result of optimise the multi-IO transaction case. The most notable sign that there is less IO latency on my test machine (nvme SSDs) is that the "noiclogs" rate has dropped substantially. This metric indicates that the CIL push is blocking in xlog_get_iclog_space() waiting for iclog IO completion to occur. With 8 iclogs of 256kB, the rate is appoximately 1 noiclog event to every 4 iclog writes. IOWs, every 4th call to xlog_get_iclog_space() is blocking waiting for log IO. With the changes in this patch, this drops to 1 noiclog event for every 100 iclog writes. Hence it is clear that log IO is completing much faster than it was previously, but it is also clear that for large iclog sizes, this isn't the performance limiting factor on this hardware. With smaller iclogs (32kB), however, there is a substantial difference. With the cache flush modifications, the journal is now running at over 4000 write IOPS, and the journal throughput is largely identical to the 256kB iclogs and the noiclog event rate stays low at about 1:50 iclog writes. The existing code tops out at about 2500 IOPS as the number of cache flushes dominate performance and latency. The noiclog event rate is about 1:4, and the performance variance is quite large as the journal throughput can fall to less than half the peak sustained rate when the cache flush rate prevents metadata writeback from keeping up and the log runs out of space and throttles reservations. As a result: logbsize fsmark create rate rm -rf before 32kb 152851+/-5.3e+04 5m28s patched 32kb 221533+/-1.1e+04 5m24s before 256kb 220239+/-6.2e+03 4m58s patched 256kb 228286+/-9.2e+03 5m06s The rm -rf times are included because I ran them, but the differences are largely noise. This workload is largely metadata read IO latency bound and the changes to the journal cache flushing doesn't really make any noticable difference to behaviour apart from a reduction in noiclog events from background CIL pushing. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2021-06-21xfs: remove need_start_rec parameter from xlog_write()Dave Chinner3-25/+25
The CIL push is the only call to xlog_write that sets this variable to true. The other callers don't need a start rec, and they tell xlog_write what to do by passing the type of ophdr they need written in the flags field. The need_start_rec parameter essentially tells xlog_write to to write an extra ophdr with a XLOG_START_TRANS type, so get rid of the variable to do this and pass XLOG_START_TRANS as the flag value into xlog_write() from the CIL push. $ size fs/xfs/xfs_log.o* text data bss dec hex filename 27595 560 8 28163 6e03 fs/xfs/xfs_log.o.orig 27454 560 8 28022 6d76 fs/xfs/xfs_log.o.patched Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2021-06-21xfs: CIL checkpoint flushes caches unconditionallyDave Chinner1-4/+21
Currently every journal IO is issued as REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA to guarantee the ordering requirements the journal has w.r.t. metadata writeback. THe two ordering constraints are: 1. we cannot overwrite metadata in the journal until we guarantee that the dirty metadata has been written back in place and is stable. 2. we cannot write back dirty metadata until it has been written to the journal and guaranteed to be stable (and hence recoverable) in the journal. These rules apply to the atomic transactions recorded in the journal, not to the journal IO itself. Hence we need to ensure metadata is stable before we start writing a new transaction to the journal (guarantee #1), and we need to ensure the entire transaction is stable in the journal before we start metadata writeback (guarantee #2). The ordering guarantees of #1 are currently provided by REQ_PREFLUSH being added to every iclog IO. This causes the journal IO to issue a cache flush and wait for it to complete before issuing the write IO to the journal. Hence all completed metadata IO is guaranteed to be stable before the journal overwrites the old metadata. However, for long running CIL checkpoints that might do a thousand journal IOs, we don't need every single one of these iclog IOs to issue a cache flush - the cache flush done before the first iclog is submitted is sufficient to cover the entire range in the log that the checkpoint will overwrite because the CIL space reservation guarantees the tail of the log (completed metadata) is already beyond the range of the checkpoint write. Hence we only need a full cache flush between closing off the CIL checkpoint context (i.e. when the push switches it out) and issuing the first journal IO. Rather than plumbing this through to the journal IO, we can start this cache flush the moment the CIL context is owned exclusively by the push worker. The cache flush can be in progress while we process the CIL ready for writing, hence reducing the latency of the initial iclog write. This is especially true for large checkpoints, where we might have to process hundreds of thousands of log vectors before we issue the first iclog write. In these cases, it is likely the cache flush has already been completed by the time we have built the CIL log vector chain. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2021-06-21xfs: async blkdev cache flushDave Chinner2-0/+37
The new checkpoint cache flush mechanism requires us to issue an unconditional cache flush before we start a new checkpoint. We don't want to block for this if we can help it, and we have a fair chunk of CPU work to do between starting the checkpoint and issuing the first journal IO. Hence it makes sense to amortise the latency cost of the cache flush by issuing it asynchronously and then waiting for it only when we need to issue the first IO in the transaction. To do this, we need async cache flush primitives to submit the cache flush bio and to wait on it. The block layer has no such primitives for filesystems, so roll our own for the moment. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2021-06-21xfs: remove xfs_blkdev_issue_flushDave Chinner5-13/+5
It's a one line wrapper around blkdev_issue_flush(). Just replace it with direct calls to blkdev_issue_flush(). Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2021-06-21nfs: fix acl memory leak of posix_acl_create()Gao Xiang1-2/+2
When looking into another nfs xfstests report, I found acl and default_acl in nfs3_proc_create() and nfs3_proc_mknod() error paths are possibly leaked. Fix them in advance. Fixes: 013cdf1088d7 ("nfs: use generic posix ACL infrastructure for v3 Posix ACLs") Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: inline wait_current_trans_commit_start in its callerDavid Sterba1-13/+7
Function wait_current_trans_commit_start is now fairly trivial so it can be inlined in its only caller. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: sink wait_for_unblock parameter to async commitDavid Sterba3-25/+4
There's only one caller left btrfs_ioctl_start_sync that passes 0, so we can remove the switch in btrfs_commit_transaction_async. A cleanup 9babda9f33fd ("btrfs: Remove async_transid from btrfs_mksubvol/create_subvol/create_snapshot") removed calls that passed 1, so this is a followup. As this removes last call of wait_current_trans_commit_start_and_unblock, remove the function as well. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: remove total_data_size variable in btrfs_batch_insert_items()Nathan Chancellor1-2/+1
clang warns: fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:684:6: warning: variable 'total_data_size' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] int total_data_size = 0, total_size = 0; ^ 1 warning generated. This variable's value has been unused since commit fc0d82e103c7 ("btrfs: sink total_data parameter in setup_items_for_insert"). Eliminate it. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1391 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: eliminate insert label in add_falloc_rangeNikolay Borisov1-12/+11
By way of inverting the list_empty conditional the insert label can be eliminated, making the function's flow entirely linear. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: subpage: fix a rare race between metadata endio and eb freeingQu Wenruo3-26/+32
[BUG] There is a very rare ASSERT() triggering during full fstests run for subpage rw support. No other reproducer so far. The ASSERT() gets triggered for metadata read in btrfs_page_set_uptodate() inside end_page_read(). [CAUSE] There is still a small race window for metadata only, the race could happen like this: T1 | T2 ------------------------------------+----------------------------- end_bio_extent_readpage() | |- btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer() | | |- free_extent_buffer() | | Still have 2 refs | |- end_page_read() | |- if (unlikely(PagePrivate()) | | The page still has Private | | | free_extent_buffer() | | | Only one ref 1, will be | | | released | | |- detach_extent_buffer_page() | | |- btrfs_detach_subpage() |- btrfs_set_page_uptodate() | The page no longer has Private| >>> ASSERT() triggered <<< | This race window is super small, thus pretty hard to hit, even with so many runs of fstests. But the race window is still there, we have to go another way to solve it other than relying on random PagePrivate() check. Data path is not affected, as it will lock the page before reading, while unlocking the page after the last read has finished, thus no race window. [FIX] This patch will fix the bug by repurposing btrfs_subpage::readers. Now btrfs_subpage::readers will be a member shared by both metadata and data. For metadata path, we don't do the page unlock as metadata only relies on extent locking. At the same time, teach page_range_has_eb() to take btrfs_subpage::readers into consideration. So that even if the last eb of a page gets freed, page::private won't be detached as long as there still are pending end_page_read() calls. By this we eliminate the race window, this will slight increase the metadata memory usage, as the page may not be released as frequently as usual. But it should not be a big deal. The code got introduced in ("btrfs: submit read time repair only for each corrupted sector"), but the fix is in a separate patch to keep the problem description and the crash is rare so it should not hurt bisectability. Signed-off-by: Qu Wegruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: don't clear page extent mapped if we're not invalidating the full pageQu Wenruo1-1/+13
[BUG] With current btrfs subpage rw support, the following script can lead to fs hang: $ mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev $ mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt $ fsstress -w -n 100 -p 1 -s 1608140256 -v -d $mnt The fs will hang at btrfs_start_ordered_extent(). [CAUSE] In above test case, btrfs_invalidate() will be called with the following parameters: offset = 0 length = 53248 page dirty = 1 subpage dirty bitmap = 0x2000 Since @offset is 0, btrfs_invalidate() will try to invalidate the full page, and finally call clear_page_extent_mapped() which will detach subpage structure from the page. And since the page no longer has subpage structure, the subpage dirty bitmap will be cleared, preventing the dirty range from being written back, thus no way to wake up the ordered extent. [FIX] Just follow other filesystems, only to invalidate the page if the range covers the full page. There are cases like truncate_setsize() which can call btrfs_invalidatepage() with offset == 0 and length != 0 for the last page of an inode. Although the old code will still try to invalidate the full page, we are still safe to just wait for ordered extent to finish. So it shouldn't cause extra problems. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: fix the filemap_range_has_page() call in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range()Qu Wenruo1-1/+12
[BUG] With current subpage RW support, the following script can hang the fs with 64K page size. # mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev # mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt # fsstress -w -n 50 -p 1 -s 1607749395 -d $mnt The kernel will do an infinite loop in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range(). [CAUSE] In btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() we: - Truncate page cache range - Lock extent io tree - Wait any ordered extents in the range. We exit the loop until we meet all the following conditions: - No ordered extent in the lock range - No page is in the lock range The latter condition has a pitfall, it only works for sector size == PAGE_SIZE case. While can't handle the following subpage case: 0 32K 64K 96K 128K | |///////||//////| || lockstart=32K lockend=96K - 1 In this case, although the range crosses 2 pages, truncate_pagecache_range() will invalidate no page at all, but only zero the [32K, 96K) range of the two pages. Thus filemap_range_has_page(32K, 96K-1) will always return true, thus we will never meet the loop exit condition. [FIX] Fix the problem by doing page alignment for the lock range. Function filemap_range_has_page() has already handled lend < lstart case, we only need to round up @lockstart, and round_down @lockend for truncate_pagecache_range(). This modification should not change any thing for sector size == PAGE_SIZE case, as in that case our range is already page aligned. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: reflink: make copy_inline_to_page() to be subpage compatibleQu Wenruo1-5/+9
The modifications are: - Page copy destination For subpage case, one page can contain multiple sectors, thus we can no longer expect the memcpy_to_page()/btrfs_decompress() to copy data into page offset 0. The correct offset is offset_in_page(file_offset) now, which should handle both regular sectorsize and subpage cases well. - Page status update Now we need to use subpage helper to handle the page status update. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make btrfs_page_mkwrite() to be subpage compatibleQu Wenruo1-2/+2
Only set_page_dirty() and SetPageUptodate() is not subpage compatible. Convert them to subpage helpers, so that __extent_writepage_io() can submit page content correctly. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make btrfs_truncate_block() to be subpage compatibleQu Wenruo1-1/+1
btrfs_truncate_block() itself is already mostly subpage compatible, the only missing part is the page dirtying code. Currently if we have a sector that needs to be truncated, we set the sector aligned range delalloc, then set the full page dirty. The problem is, current subpage code requires subpage dirty bit to be set, or __extent_writepage_io() won't submit bio, thus leads to ordered extent never to finish. So this patch will make btrfs_truncate_block() to call btrfs_page_set_dirty() helper to replace set_page_dirty() to fix the problem. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make __extent_writepage_io() only submit dirty range for subpageQu Wenruo1-5/+75
__extent_writepage_io() function originally just iterates through all the extent maps of a page, and submits any regular extents. This is fine for sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE case, as if a page is dirty, we need to submit the only sector contained in the page. But for subpage case, one dirty page can contain several clean sectors with at least one dirty sector. If __extent_writepage_io() still submit all regular extent maps, it can submit data which is already written to disk. And since such already written data won't have corresponding ordered extents, it will trigger a BUG_ON() in btrfs_csum_one_bio(). Change the behavior of __extent_writepage_io() by finding the first dirty byte in the page, and only submit the dirty range other than the full extent. Since we're also here, also modify the following calls to be subpage compatible: - SetPageError() - end_page_writeback() Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make btrfs_set_range_writeback() subpage compatibleQu Wenruo3-7/+10
Function btrfs_set_range_writeback() currently just sets the page writeback unconditionally. Change it to call the subpage helper so that we can handle both cases well. Since the subpage helpers needs btrfs_fs_info, also change the parameter to accept btrfs_inode. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: prevent extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() to unlock page not locked by __process_pages_contig()Qu Wenruo1-1/+15
In cow_file_range(), after we have succeeded creating an inline extent, we unlock the page with extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() by passing locked_page == NULL. For sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE case, this is just making the page lock and unlock harder to grab. But for incoming subpage case, it can be a big problem. For incoming subpage case, page locking have two entry points: - __process_pages_contig() In that case, we know exactly the range we want to lock (which only requires sector alignment). To handle the subpage requirement, we introduce btrfs_subpage::writers to page::private, and will update it in __process_pages_contig(). - Other directly lock/unlock_page() call sites Those won't touch btrfs_subpage::writers at all. This means, page locked by __process_pages_contig() can only be unlocked by __process_pages_contig(). Thankfully we already have the existing infrastructure in the form of @locked_page in various call sites. Unfortunately, extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() in cow_file_range() after creating an inline extent is the exception. It intentionally call extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() with locked_page == NULL, to also unlock current page (and clear its dirty/writeback bits). To co-operate with incoming subpage modifications, and make the page lock/unlock pair easier to understand, this patch will still call extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() with locked_page, and only unlock the page in __extent_writepage(). Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: update locked page dirty/writeback/error bits in __process_pages_contigQu Wenruo1-4/+4
When __process_pages_contig() gets called for extent_clear_unlock_delalloc(), if we hit the locked page, only Private2 bit is updated, but dirty/writeback/error bits are all skipped. There are several call sites that call extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() with locked_page and PAGE_CLEAR_DIRTY/PAGE_SET_WRITEBACK/PAGE_END_WRITEBACK - cow_file_range() - run_delalloc_nocow() - cow_file_range_async() All for their error handling branches. For those call sites, since we skip the locked page for dirty/error/writeback bit update, the locked page will still have its subpage dirty bit remaining. Normally it's the call sites which locked the page to handle the locked page, but it won't hurt if we also do the update. Especially there are already other call sites doing the same thing by manually passing NULL as locked_page. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make page Ordered bit to be subpage compatibleQu Wenruo3-8/+18
This involves the following modification: - Ordered extent creation This is done in process_one_page(), now PAGE_SET_ORDERED will call subpage helper to do the work. - endio functions This is done in btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished(). - btrfs_invalidatepage() - btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() Use the subpage page helper, and add an extra branch to exit if the locked page have covered the full range. Now the usage of page Ordered flag for ordered extent accounting is fully subpage compatible. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: introduce helpers for subpage ordered statusQu Wenruo2-0/+33
This patch introduces the following functions to handle btrfs subpage ordered (Private2) status: - btrfs_subpage_set_ordered() - btrfs_subpage_clear_ordered() - btrfs_subpage_test_ordered() These helpers can only be called when the range is ensured to be inside the page. - btrfs_page_set_ordered() - btrfs_page_clear_ordered() - btrfs_page_test_ordered() These helpers can handle both regular sector size and subpage without problem. These functions are here to coordinate btrfs_invalidatepage() with btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered(), to make sure only one of those functions can finish the ordered extent. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make process_one_page() to handle subpage lockingQu Wenruo3-15/+94
Introduce a new data inodes specific subpage member, writers, to record how many sectors are under page lock for delalloc writing. This member acts pretty much the same as readers, except it's only for delalloc writes. This is important for delalloc code to trace which page can really be freed, as we have cases like run_delalloc_nocow() where we may exit processing nocow range inside a page, but need to exit to do cow half way. In that case, we need a way to determine if we can really unlock a full page. With the new btrfs_subpage::writers, there is a new requirement: - Page locked by process_one_page() must be unlocked by process_one_page() There are still tons of call sites manually lock and unlock a page, without updating btrfs_subpage::writers. So if we lock a page through process_one_page() then it must be unlocked by process_one_page() to keep btrfs_subpage::writers consistent. This will be handled in next patch. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make end_bio_extent_writepage() to be subpage compatibleQu Wenruo1-1/+2
Now in end_bio_extent_writepage(), the only subpage incompatible code is the end_page_writeback(). Just call the subpage helpers. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make __process_pages_contig() to handle subpage dirty/error/writeback statusQu Wenruo1-8/+16
For __process_pages_contig() and process_one_page(), to handle subpage we only need to pass bytenr in and call subpage helpers to handle dirty/error/writeback status. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make btrfs_dirty_pages() to be subpage compatibleQu Wenruo1-2/+5
Since the extent io tree operations in btrfs_dirty_pages() are already subpage compatible, we only need to make the page status update to use subpage helpers. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: only require sector size alignment for end_bio_extent_writepage()Qu Wenruo1-17/+12
Just like read page, for subpage support we only require sector size alignment. So change the error message condition to only require sector alignment. This should not affect existing code, as for regular sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE case, we are still requiring page alignment. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: provide btrfs_page_clamp_*() helpersQu Wenruo2-0/+48
In the coming subpage RW supports, there are a lot of page status update calls which need to be converted to subpage compatible version, which needs @start and @len. Some call sites already have such @start/@len and are already in page range, like various endio functions. But there are also call sites which need to clamp the range for subpage case, like btrfs_dirty_pagse() and __process_contig_pages(). Here we introduce new helpers, btrfs_page_clamp_*(), to do and only do the clamp for subpage version. Although in theory all existing btrfs_page_*() calls can be converted to use btrfs_page_clamp_*() directly, but that would make us to do unnecessary clamp operations. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: refactor page status update into process_one_page()Qu Wenruo1-97/+109
In __process_pages_contig() we update page status according to page_ops. That update process is a bunch of 'if' branches, which lie inside two loops, this makes it pretty hard to expand for later subpage operations. So this patch will extract these operations into its own function, process_one_pages(). Also since we're refactoring __process_pages_contig(), also move the new helper and __process_pages_contig() before the first caller of them, to remove the forward declaration. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: pass bytenr directly to __process_pages_contig()Qu Wenruo1-20/+37
As a preparation for incoming subpage support, we need bytenr passed to __process_pages_contig() directly, not the current page index. So change the parameter and all callers to pass bytenr in. With the modification, here we need to replace the old @index_ret with @processed_end for __process_pages_contig(), but this brings a small problem. Normally we follow the inclusive return value, meaning @processed_end should be the last byte we processed. If parameter @start is 0, and we failed to lock any page, then we would return @processed_end as -1, causing more problems for __unlock_for_delalloc(). So here for @processed_end, we use two different return value patterns. If we have locked any page, @processed_end will be the last byte of locked page. Or it will be @start otherwise. This change will impact lock_delalloc_pages(), so it needs to check @processed_end to only unlock the range if we have locked any. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: fix hang when run_delalloc_range() failedQu Wenruo1-0/+21
[BUG] When running subpage preparation patches on x86, btrfs/125 will hang forever with one ordered extent never finished. [CAUSE] The test case btrfs/125 itself will always fail as the fix is never merged. When the test fails at balance, btrfs needs to cleanup the ordered extent in btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() for data reloc inode. The problem is in the sequence how we cleanup the page Order bit. Currently it works like: btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() |- find_get_page(); |- btrfs_page_clear_ordered(page); | Now the page doesn't have Ordered bit anymore. | !!! This also includes the first (locked) page !!! | |- offset += PAGE_SIZE | This is to skip the first page |- __endio_write_update_ordered() |- btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished(NULL) Except the first page, all ordered extents are finished. Then the locked page is cleaned up in __extent_writepage(): __extent_writepage() |- If (PageError(page)) |- end_extent_writepage() |- btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished(page) |- if (btrfs_test_page_ordered(page)) |- !!! The page gets skipped !!! The ordered extent is not decreased as the page doesn't have ordered bit anymore. This leaves the ordered extent with bytes_left == sectorsize, thus never finish. [FIX] The fix is to ensure we never clear page Ordered bit without running the ordered extent accounting. Here we choose to skip the locked page in btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() so that later end_extent_writepage() can properly finish the ordered extent. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: rename PagePrivate2 to PageOrdered inside btrfsQu Wenruo5-31/+43
Inside btrfs we use Private2 page status to indicate we have an ordered extent with pending IO for the sector. But the page status name, Private2, tells us nothing about the bit itself, so this patch will rename it to Ordered. And with extra comment about the bit added, so reader who is still uncertain about the page Ordered status, will find the comment pretty easily. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: refactor btrfs_invalidatepage() for subpage supportQu Wenruo1-74/+97
This patch will refactor btrfs_invalidatepage() for the incoming subpage support. The involved modifications are: - Use while() loop instead of "goto again;" - Use single variable to determine whether to delete extent states Each branch will also have comments why we can or cannot delete the extent states - Do qgroup free and extent states deletion per-loop Current code can only work for PAGE_SIZE == sectorsize case. This refactor also makes it clear what we do for different sectors: - Sectors without ordered extent We're completely safe to remove all extent states for the sector(s) - Sectors with ordered extent, but no Private2 bit This means the endio has already been executed, we can't remove all extent states for the sector(s). - Sectors with ordere extent, still has Private2 bit This means we need to decrease the ordered extent accounting. And then it comes to two different variants: * We have finished and removed the ordered extent Then it's the same as "sectors without ordered extent" * We didn't finished the ordered extent We can remove some extent states, but not all. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: introduce btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_range()Qu Wenruo2-0/+77
Although we already have btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent() and btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(), they all have their own limitations: - btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent() can't do extra range check It's only designed to lookup any ordered extent before certain bytenr. - btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent() may not return the first ordered extent in the range It doesn't ensure the first ordered extent is returned. The existing callers are only interested in exhausting all ordered extents in a range, the order is not important. For incoming btrfs_invalidatepage() refactoring, we need a way to properly iterate all ordered extents in their bytenr order of a range. So this patch will introduce a new function, btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_range(), to do ordered extent with bytenr order awareness and extra range check. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: update comments in btrfs_invalidatepage()Qu Wenruo1-6/+15
The existing comments in btrfs_invalidatepage() don't really get to the point, especially for what Private2 is really representing and how the race avoidance is done. The truth is, there are only three entrances to do ordered extent accounting: - btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered() - __endio_write_update_ordered() Those two entrance are just endio functions for dio and buffered write. - btrfs_invalidatepage() But there is a pitfall, in endio functions there is no check on whether the ordered extent is already accounted. They just blindly clear the Private2 bit and do the accounting. So it's all btrfs_invalidatepage()'s responsibility to make sure we won't do double account for the same sector. That's why in btrfs_invalidatepage() we have to wait for page writeback, this will ensure all submitted bios have finished, thus their endio functions have finished the accounting on the ordered extent. Then we also check page Private2 to ensure that, we only run ordered extent accounting on pages who has no bio submitted. This patch will rework related comments to make it more clear on the race and how we use wait_on_page_writeback() and Private2 to prevent double accounting on ordered extent. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: refactor how we finish ordered extent io for endio functionsQu Wenruo3-113/+127
Btrfs has two endio functions to mark certain io range finished for ordered extents: - __endio_write_update_ordered() This is for direct IO - btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered() This for buffered IO. However they go different routines to handle ordered extent io: - Whether to iterate through all ordered extents __endio_write_update_ordered() will but btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered() will not. In fact, iterating through all ordered extents will benefit later subpage support, while for current PAGE_SIZE == sectorsize requirement this behavior makes no difference. - Whether to update page Private2 flag __endio_write_update_ordered() will not update page Private2 flag as for iomap direct IO, the page can not be even mapped. While btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered() will clear Private2 to prevent double accounting against btrfs_invalidatepage(). Those differences are pretty subtle, and the ordered extent iterations code in callers makes code much harder to read. So this patch will introduce a new function, btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished(), to do the heavy lifting: - Iterate through all ordered extents in the range - Do the ordered extent accounting - Queue the work for finished ordered extent This function has two new feature: - Proper underflow detection and recovery The old underflow detection will only detect the problem, then continue. No proper info like root/inode/ordered extent info, nor noisy enough to be caught by fstests. Furthermore when underflow happens, the ordered extent will never finish. New error detection will reset the bytes_left to 0, do proper kernel warning, and output extra info including root, ino, ordered extent range, the underflow value. - Prevent double accounting based on Private2 flag Now if we find a range without Private2 flag, we will skip to next range. As that means someone else has already finished the accounting of ordered extent. This makes no difference for current code, but will be a critical part for incoming subpage support, as we can call btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() for multiple sectors if they are beyond inode size. Thus such double accounting prevention is a key feature for subpage. Now both endio functions only need to call that new function. And since the only caller of btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending() is removed, also remove btrfs_dec_test_first_ordered_pending() completely. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make Private2 lifespan more consistentQu Wenruo1-1/+1
Currently we use page Private2 bit to indicate that we have ordered extent for the page range. But the lifespan of it is not consistent, during regular writeback path, there are two locations to clear the same PagePrivate2: T ----- Page marked Dirty | + ----- Page marked Private2, through btrfs_run_dealloc_range() | + ----- Page cleared Private2, through btrfs_writepage_cow_fixup() | in __extent_writepage_io() | ^^^ Private2 cleared for the first time | + ----- Page marked Writeback, through btrfs_set_range_writeback() | in __extent_writepage_io(). | + ----- Page cleared Private2, through | btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered() | ^^^ Private2 cleared for the second time. | + ----- Page cleared Writeback, through btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered() Currently PagePrivate2 is mostly to prevent ordered extent accounting being executed for both endio and invalidatepage. Thus only the one who cleared page Private2 is responsible for ordered extent accounting. But the fact is, in btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered(), page Private2 is cleared and ordered extent accounting is executed unconditionally. The race prevention only happens through btrfs_invalidatepage(), where we wait for the page writeback first, before checking the Private2 bit. This means, Private2 is also protected by Writeback bit, and there is no need for btrfs_writepage_cow_fixup() to clear Priavte2. This patch will change btrfs_writepage_cow_fixup() to just check PagePrivate2, not to clear it. The clearing will happen in either btrfs_invalidatepage() or btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered(). This makes the Private2 bit easier to understand, just meaning the page has unfinished ordered extent attached to it. And this patch is a hard requirement for the incoming refactoring for how we finished ordered IO for endio context, as the coming patch will check Private2 to determine if we need to do the ordered extent accounting. Thus this patch is definitely needed or we will hang due to unfinished ordered extent. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered()Qu Wenruo4-14/+18
There is a pretty bad abuse of btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered() in end_compressed_bio_write(). It passes compressed pages to btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered(), which is only supposed to accept inode pages. Thankfully the important info here is the inode, so let's pass btrfs_inode directly into btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered(), and make @page parameter optional. By this, end_compressed_bio_write() can happily pass page=NULL while still getting everything done properly. Also, to cooperate with such modification, replace @page parameter for trace_btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook() with btrfs_inode. Although this removes page_index info, the existing start/len should be enough for most usage. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make subpage metadata write path call its own endio functionsQu Wenruo1-36/+36
For subpage metadata, we're reusing two functions for subpage metadata write: - end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage() - write_one_eb() But the truth is, for subpage we just call end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage() without using any bit in end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage(). For write_one_eb(), it's pretty similar, but with a small part of code reused. There is really no need to pollute the existing code path if we're not really using most of them. So this patch will do the following change to separate the subpage metadata write path from regular write path by: - Use end_bio_subpage_eb_writepage() directly as endio in write_one_subpage_eb() - Directly call write_one_subpage_eb() in submit_eb_subpage() Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: refactor submit_extent_page() to make bio and its flag tracing easierQu Wenruo4-111/+152
There is a lot of code inside extent_io.c needs both "struct bio **bio_ret" and "unsigned long prev_bio_flags", along with some parameters like "unsigned long bio_flags". Such strange parameters are here for bio assembly. For example, we have such inode page layout: 0 4K 8K 12K |<-- Extent A-->|<- EB->| Then what we do is: - Page [0, 4K) *bio_ret = NULL So we allocate a new bio to bio_ret, Add page [0, 4K) to *bio_ret. - Page [4K, 8K) *bio_ret != NULL We found this page is continuous to *bio_ret, and if we're not at stripe boundary, we add page [4K, 8K) to *bio_ret. - Page [8K, 12K) *bio_ret != NULL But we found this page is not continuous, so we submit *bio_ret, then allocate a new bio, and add page [8K, 12K) to the new bio. This means we need to record both the bio and its bio_flag, but we record them manually using those strange parameter list, other than encapsulating them into their own structure. So this patch will introduce a new structure, btrfs_bio_ctrl, to record both the bio, and its bio_flags. Also, in above case, for all pages added to the bio, we need to check if the new page crosses stripe boundary. This check itself can be time consuming, and we don't really need to do that for each page. This patch also integrates the stripe boundary check into btrfs_bio_ctrl. When a new bio is allocated, the stripe and ordered extent boundary is also calculated, so no matter how large the bio will be, we only calculate the boundaries once, to save some CPU time. The following functions/structures are affected: - struct extent_page_data Replace its bio pointer with structure btrfs_bio_ctrl (embedded structure, not pointer) - end_write_bio() - flush_write_bio() Just change how bio is fetched - btrfs_bio_add_page() Use pre-calculated boundaries instead of re-calculating them. And use @bio_ctrl to replace @bio and @prev_bio_flags. - calc_bio_boundaries() New function - submit_extent_page() callers - btrfs_do_readpage() callers - contiguous_readpages() callers To Use @bio_ctrl to replace @bio and @prev_bio_flags, and how to grab bio. - btrfs_bio_fits_in_ordered_extent() Removed, as now the ordered extent size limit is done at bio allocation time, no need to check for each page range. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: allow btrfs_bio_fits_in_stripe() to accept bio without any pageQu Wenruo1-6/+3
Function btrfs_bio_fits_in_stripe() now requires a bio with at least one page added. Or btrfs_get_chunk_map() will fail with -ENOENT. But in fact this requirement is not needed at all, as we can just pass sectorsize for btrfs_get_chunk_map(). This tiny behavior change is important for later subpage refactoring on submit_extent_page(). As for 64K page size, we can have a page range with pgoff=0 and size=64K. If the logical bytenr is just 16K before the stripe boundary, we have to split the page range into two bios. This means, we must check page range against stripe boundary, even adding the range to an empty bio. This tiny refactoring is for the incoming changes, but on its own, regular sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE is not affected anyway. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: remove the unused parameter @len for btrfs_bio_fits_in_stripe()Qu Wenruo3-7/+6
The parameter @len is not really used in btrfs_bio_fits_in_stripe(), just remove it. It got removed in 420343131970 ("btrfs: let callers of btrfs_get_io_geometry pass the em"), before that btrfs_get_chunk_map utilized it. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: make free space cache size consistent across different PAGE_SIZEQu Wenruo1-9/+9
Currently free space cache inode size is determined by two factors: - block group size - PAGE_SIZE This means, for the same sized block groups, with different PAGE_SIZE, it will result in different inode sizes. This will not be a good thing for subpage support, so change the requirement for PAGE_SIZE to sectorsize. Now for the same 4K sectorsize btrfs, it should result the same inode size no matter what the PAGE_SIZE is. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: scrub: fix subpage repair error caused by hard coded PAGE_SIZEQu Wenruo1-40/+42
[BUG] For the following file layout, scrub will not be able to repair all these two repairable error, but in fact make one corruption even unrepairable: inode offset 0 4k 8K Mirror 1 |XXXXXX| | Mirror 2 | |XXXXXX| [CAUSE] The root cause is the hard coded PAGE_SIZE, which makes scrub repair to go crazy for subpage. For above case, when reading the first sector, we use PAGE_SIZE other than sectorsize to read, which makes us to read the full range [0, 64K). In fact, after 8K there may be no data at all, we can just get some garbage. Then when doing the repair, we also writeback a full page from mirror 2, this means, we will also writeback the corrupted data in mirror 2 back to mirror 1, leaving the range [4K, 8K) unrepairable. [FIX] This patch will modify the following PAGE_SIZE use with sectorsize: - scrub_print_warning_inode() Remove the min() and replace PAGE_SIZE with sectorsize. The min() makes no sense, as csum is done for the full sector with padding. This fixes a bug that subpage report extra length like: checksum error at logical 298844160 on dev /dev/mapper/arm_nvme-test, physical 575668224, root 5, inode 257, offset 0, length 12288, links 1 (path: file) Where the error is only 1 sector. - scrub_handle_errored_block() Comments with PAGE|page involved, all changed to sector. - scrub_setup_recheck_block() - scrub_repair_page_from_good_copy() - scrub_add_page_to_wr_bio() - scrub_wr_submit() - scrub_add_page_to_rd_bio() - scrub_block_complete() Replace PAGE_SIZE with sectorsize. This solves several problems where we read/write extra range for subpage case. RAID56 code is excluded intentionally, as RAID56 has extra PAGE_SIZE usage, and is not really safe enough. Thus we will reject RAID56 for subpage in later commit. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: use list_last_entry in add_falloc_rangeNikolay Borisov1-4/+3
Instead of calling list_entry with head->prev simply call list_last_entry which makes it obvious which member of the list is being referred. This allows to remove the extra 'prev' pointer. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: fix comment about max_out in btrfs_compress_pagesAnand Jain1-3/+0
Commit e5d74902362f ("btrfs: derive maximum output size in the compression implementation") removed @max_out argument in btrfs_compress_pages() but its comment remained, remove it. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: optimize variables size in btrfs_submit_compressed_writeAnand Jain2-6/+6
Patch "btrfs: reduce compressed_bio member's types" reduced some member's size. Function arguments @len, @compressed_len and @nr_pages can be declared as unsigned int. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: optimize variables size in btrfs_submit_compressed_readAnand Jain1-3/+3
Patch "btrfs: reduce compressed_bio member's types" reduced some member's size. Declare the variables @compressed_len, @nr_pages and @pg_index size as an unsigned int in the function btrfs_submit_compressed_read. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: reduce the variable size to fit nr_pagesAnand Jain1-3/+3
Patch "btrfs: reduce compressed_bio member's types" reduced the @nr_pages size to unsigned int, its cascading effects are updated here. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: avoid unnecessary logging of xattrs during fast fsyncsFilipe Manana1-3/+13
When logging an inode we always log all its xattrs, so that we are able to figure out which ones should be deleted during log replay. However this is unnecessary when we are doing a fast fsync and no xattrs were added, changed or deleted since the last time we logged the inode in the current transaction. So skip the logging of xattrs when the inode was previously logged in the current transaction and no xattrs were added, changed or deleted. If any changes to xattrs happened, than the inode has BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING set in its runtime flags and the xattrs get logged. This saves time on scanning for xattrs, allocating memory, COWing log tree extent buffers and adding more lock contention on the extent buffers when there are multiple tasks logging in parallel. The use of xattrs is common when using ACLs, some applications, or when using security modules like SELinux where every inode gets a security xattr added to it. The following test script, using fio, was used on a box with 12 cores, 64G of RAM, a NVMe device and the default non-debug kernel config from Debian. It uses 8 concurrent jobs each writing in blocks of 64K to its own 4G file, each file with a single xattr of 50 bytes (about the same size for an ACL or SELinux xattr), doing random buffered writes with an fsync after each write. $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/test MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-d single -m single" NUM_JOBS=8 FILE_SIZE=4G cat <<EOF > /tmp/fio-job.ini [writers] rw=randwrite fsync=1 fallocate=none group_reporting=1 direct=0 bs=64K ioengine=sync size=$FILE_SIZE directory=$MNT numjobs=$NUM_JOBS EOF echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV > /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT echo "Creating files before fio runs, each with 1 xattr of 50 bytes" for ((i = 0; i < $NUM_JOBS; i++)); do path="$MNT/writers.$i.0" truncate -s $FILE_SIZE $path setfattr -n user.xa1 -v $(printf '%0.sX' $(seq 50)) $path done fio /tmp/fio-job.ini umount $MNT fio output before this change: WRITE: bw=120MiB/s (126MB/s), 120MiB/s-120MiB/s (126MB/s-126MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=272145-272145msec fio output after this change: WRITE: bw=142MiB/s (149MB/s), 142MiB/s-142MiB/s (149MB/s-149MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=230408-230408msec +16.8% throughput, -16.6% runtime Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>