aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/asm-x86/bitops_64.h (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2007-10-25x86 bitops: fix code style issuesRandy Dunlap1-26/+26
Coding style cleanups: - change __inline__ to inline; - drop space in "* addr" parameters; - drop space between func. name and '(' The "volatile" keywords are correct according to email from one Linus Torvalds. [Several other arches need some of this also.] Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-25bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macroRandy Dunlap1-2/+5
Use duplicated inline functions for test_and_set_bit_lock() on x86 instead of #define macros, thus avoiding a bad example. This allows kernel-doc to run cleanly instead of terminating with an error: Error(linux-2.6.24-rc1//include/asm-x86/bitops_32.h:188): cannot understand prototype: 'test_and_set_bit_lock test_and_set_bit ' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-23x86: lock bitopsNick Piggin1-1/+41
I missed an obvious one! x86 CPUs are defined not to reorder stores past earlier loads, so there is no hardware memory barrier required to implement a release-consistent store (all stores are, by definition). So ditch the generic lock bitops, and implement optimised versions for x86, which removes the mfence from __clear_bit_unlock (which is already a useful primitive for SLUB). Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-19forbid asm/bitops.h direct inclusionJiri Slaby1-0/+4
forbid asm/bitops.h direct inclusion Because of compile errors that may occur after bit changes if asm/bitops.h is included directly without e.g. linux/kernel.h which includes linux/bitops.h, forbid direct inclusion of asm/bitops.h. Thanks to Adrian Bunk. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-18bitops: introduce lock opsNick Piggin1-0/+1
Introduce test_and_set_bit_lock / clear_bit_unlock bitops with lock semantics. Convert all architectures to use the generic implementation. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Cc: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> Cc: Richard Curnow <rc@rc0.org.uk> Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Cc: Miles Bader <uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-10-17x86: Eliminate result signage problem in asm-x86_64/bitops.hChuck Lever1-1/+1
The return type of __scanbit() doesn't match the return type of find_{first,next}_bit(). Thus when you construct something like this: boolean ? __scanbit() : find_first_bit() you get an unsigned long result if "boolean" is true, and a signed long result if "boolean" is false. In file included from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/mmzone.h:15, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/gfp.h:4, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/slab.h:14, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/percpu.h:5, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/rcupdate.h:41, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/dcache.h:10, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/fs.h:275, from /home/cel/src/linux/fs/nfs/sysctl.c:9: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h: In function ‘__first_node’: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h:229: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h: In function ‘__next_node’: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h:235: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h: In function ‘__first_unset_node’: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h:253: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression [ tglx: arch/x86 adaptation ] Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-11i386/x86_64: move headers to include/asm-x86Thomas Gleixner1-0/+427
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the header install make rules Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>