aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/asm-x86/uaccess_64.h (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-07-09x86: introduce copy_user_handle_tail() routineVitaly Mayatskikh1-0/+3
Introduce generic C routine for handling necessary tail operations after protection fault in copy_*_user on x86. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: define architectural characteristics in uaccess.h.Glauber Costa1-3/+0
Remove them from the arch-specific file. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: move __get_user and __put_user into uaccess.h.Glauber Costa1-8/+0
We also carry the unaligned version with us. Only x86_64 uses it, but there's no problem in defining it. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: merge put_user.Glauber Costa1-36/+0
Move both versions, which are highly similar, to uaccess.h. Note that, for x86_64, X86_WP_WORKS_OK is always defined. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: turn __put_user_check directly into put_user.Glauber Costa1-5/+3
We also check user pointer in x86_64 put_user, the way i386 does. In a separate patch for bisecting purposes. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: merge __get_user_asm and its users.Glauber Costa1-43/+0
Move __get_user_asm and __get_user_size and __get_user_nocheck to uaccess.h. This requires us to define a macro at __get_user_size for the 64-bit access case. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: don't always use EFAULT on __get_user_size.Glauber Costa1-6/+6
Let the user of the macro specify the desired return. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: merge __put_user_asm and its user.Glauber Costa1-51/+0
Move both __put_user_asm and __put_user_size to uaccess.h. i386 already had a special function for 64-bit access, so for x86_64, we just define a macro with the same name. Note that for X86_64, CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK will always be defined, so the #else part will never be even compiled in. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: don't always use EFAULT on __put_user_size.Glauber Costa1-6/+6
Let the user of the macro specify the desired return. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: move __addr_ok to uaccess.h.Glauber Costa1-3/+0
Take it out of uaccess_32.h. Since it seems that no users of the x86_64 exists, we simply pick the i386 version. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: merge getuser.Glauber Costa1-29/+0
Merge versions of getuser from uaccess_32.h and uaccess_64.h into uaccess.h. There is a part which is 64-bit only (for now), and for that, we use a __get_user_8 macro. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: merge common parts of uaccess.Glauber Costa1-83/+0
Common parts of uaccess_32.h and uaccess_64.h are put in uaccess.h. Bits in uaccess_32.h and uaccess_64.h that come to this file are equal except for comments and whitespaces differences. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: use something common for both architectures.Glauber Costa1-1/+1
Using explicit hexa (0xFFFFFFUL) introduces an unnecessary difference between i386 and x86_64 because of the size of their long. Use -1UL instead. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: introduce likely in macro.Glauber Costa1-1/+1
Put the likely hint in access_ok. Just for bisectability. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: change asm constraint.Glauber Costa1-1/+1
Our integration efforts broke a build with this function being used with i386. Reason is "g" can put the operand in an imm32, which according to The Book (tm), is invalid as the second operand. This is actually a bug in x86_64 too, since the x86_64 instruction set reference does not list it as valid. We probably didn't trigger this before due to the ammount of registers available for 64-bit platforms. But that's just my guess. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: commonize __range_not_ok.Glauber Costa1-2/+1
For i386, __range_not_ok is a better name than __range_ok, since it returns 0 when it is in fact okay. Other than that, both versions does not need the word size specifiers, and we remove them. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: pass argument to putuser_64 functions in ax register.Glauber Costa1-1/+1
This is consistent with i386 usage. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: clobber rbx in putuser_64.S.Glauber Costa1-1/+1
Instead of clobbering r8, clobber rbx, which is the i386 way. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-07-09x86: don't clobber r8 nor use rcx.Glauber Costa1-2/+1
There's really no reason to clobber r8 or pass the address in rcx. We can safely use only two registers (which we already have to touch anyway) to do the job. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-04-17include/asm-x86/uaccess_64.h: checkpatch cleanups - formatting onlyJoe Perches1-149/+227
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-02-04x86: use _ASM_EXTABLE macro in include/asm-x86/uaccess_64.hH. Peter Anvin1-8/+2
Use the _ASM_EXTABLE macro from <asm/asm.h>, instead of open-coding __ex_table entires in include/asm-x86/uaccess_64.h. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-01-30x86: use helper in fault_64.cHarvey Harrison1-0/+2
Use the fixup_exception() helper in fault_64.c Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2007-10-11i386/x86_64: move headers to include/asm-x86Thomas Gleixner1-0/+384
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the header install make rules Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Copyright © 1996 – 2023 Jason A. Donenfeld. All Rights Reverse Engineered.