aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/linux/balloon_compaction.h (unfollow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-01-08TOMOYO: Update LSM flags to no longer be exclusiveKees Cook1-1/+1
With blob sharing in place, TOMOYO is no longer an exclusive LSM, so it can operate separately now. Mark it as such. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08LSM: Infrastructure management of the ipc security blobCasey Schaufler6-121/+110
Move management of the kern_ipc_perm->security and msg_msg->security blobs out of the individual security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated there. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08Smack: Abstract use of ipc security blobsCasey Schaufler2-5/+20
Don't use the ipc->security pointer directly. Don't use the msg_msg->security pointer directly. Provide helper functions that provides the security blob pointers. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08SELinux: Abstract use of ipc security blobsCasey Schaufler2-9/+22
Don't use the ipc->security pointer directly. Don't use the msg_msg->security pointer directly. Provide helper functions that provides the security blob pointers. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08LSM: Infrastructure management of the task securityCasey Schaufler4-27/+62
Move management of the task_struct->security blob out of the individual security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated there. The only user of this blob is AppArmor. The AppArmor use is abstracted to avoid future conflict. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08LSM: Infrastructure management of the inode securityCasey Schaufler6-98/+93
Move management of the inode->i_security blob out of the individual security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated there. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08Smack: Abstract use of inode security blobCasey Schaufler2-18/+23
Don't use the inode->i_security pointer directly. Provide a helper function that provides the security blob pointer. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08SELinux: Abstract use of inode security blobCasey Schaufler3-15/+21
Don't use the inode->i_security pointer directly. Provide a helper function that provides the security blob pointer. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08LSM: Infrastructure management of the file securityCasey Schaufler8-51/+72
Move management of the file->f_security blob out of the individual security modules and into the infrastructure. The modules no longer allocate or free the data, instead they tell the infrastructure how much space they require. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08Smack: Abstract use of file security blobCasey Schaufler2-4/+13
Don't use the file->f_security pointer directly. Provide a helper function that provides the security blob pointer. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08SELinux: Abstract use of file security blobCasey Schaufler2-9/+14
Don't use the file->f_security pointer directly. Provide a helper function that provides the security blob pointer. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08Infrastructure management of the cred security blobCasey Schaufler11-102/+162
Move management of the cred security blob out of the security modules and into the security infrastructre. Instead of allocating and freeing space the security modules tell the infrastructure how much space they require. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08TOMOYO: Abstract use of cred security blobCasey Schaufler4-16/+64
Don't use the cred->security pointer directly. Provide helper functions that provide the security blob pointer. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08AppArmor: Abstract use of cred security blobCasey Schaufler4-10/+24
Don't use the cred->security pointer directly. Provide a helper function that provides the security blob pointer. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08SELinux: Remove unused selinux_is_enabledCasey Schaufler7-65/+1
There are no longer users of selinux_is_enabled(). Remove it. As selinux_is_enabled() is the only reason for include/linux/selinux.h remove that as well. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08SELinux: Remove cred security blob poisoningCasey Schaufler2-19/+0
The SELinux specific credential poisioning only makes sense if SELinux is managing the credentials. As the intent of this patch set is to move the blob management out of the modules and into the infrastructure, the SELinux specific code has to go. The poisioning could be introduced into the infrastructure at some later date. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08SELinux: Abstract use of cred security blobCasey Schaufler3-29/+34
Don't use the cred->security pointer directly. Provide a helper function that provides the security blob pointer. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08Smack: Abstract use of cred security blobCasey Schaufler4-43/+53
Don't use the cred->security pointer directly. Provide a helper function that provides the security blob pointer. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08procfs: add smack subdir to attrsCasey Schaufler5-21/+96
Back in 2007 I made what turned out to be a rather serious mistake in the implementation of the Smack security module. The SELinux module used an interface in /proc to manipulate the security context on processes. Rather than use a similar interface, I used the same interface. The AppArmor team did likewise. Now /proc/.../attr/current will tell you the security "context" of the process, but it will be different depending on the security module you're using. This patch provides a subdirectory in /proc/.../attr for Smack. Smack user space can use the "current" file in this subdirectory and never have to worry about getting SELinux attributes by mistake. Programs that use the old interface will continue to work (or fail, as the case may be) as before. The proposed S.A.R.A security module is dependent on the mechanism to create its own attr subdirectory. The original implementation is by Kees Cook. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08capability: Initialize as LSM_ORDER_FIRSTKees Cook3-8/+8
This converts capabilities to use the new LSM_ORDER_FIRST position. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-01-08LSM: Introduce enum lsm_orderKees Cook2-1/+14
In preparation for distinguishing the "capability" LSM from other LSMs, it must be ordered first. This introduces LSM_ORDER_MUTABLE for the general LSMs and LSM_ORDER_FIRST for capability. In the future LSM_ORDER_LAST for could be added for anything that must run last (e.g. Landlock may use this). Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08Yama: Initialize as ordered LSMKees Cook4-8/+8
This converts Yama from being a direct "minor" LSM into an ordered LSM. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-01-08LoadPin: Initialize as ordered LSMKees Cook4-45/+8
This converts LoadPin from being a direct "minor" LSM into an ordered LSM. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-01-08LSM: Split LSM preparation from initializationKees Cook1-6/+15
Since we already have to do a pass through the LSMs to figure out if exclusive LSMs should be disabled after the first one is seen as enabled, this splits the logic up a bit more cleanly. Now we do a full "prepare" pass through the LSMs (which also allows for later use by the blob-sharing code), before starting the LSM initialization pass. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08LSM: Add all exclusive LSMs to ordered initializationCasey Schaufler1-25/+20
This removes CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY in favor of the explicit ordering offered by CONFIG_LSM and adds all the exclusive LSMs to the ordered LSM initialization. The old meaning of CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY is now captured by which exclusive LSM is listed first in the LSM order. All LSMs not added to the ordered list are explicitly disabled. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-01-08selinux: Remove SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUEKees Cook2-19/+1
In preparation for removing CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY, this removes the soon-to-be redundant SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE. Since explicit ordering via CONFIG_LSM or "lsm=" will define whether an LSM is enabled or not, this CONFIG will become effectively ignored, so remove it. However, in order to stay backward-compatible with "security=selinux", the enable variable defaults to true. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08apparmor: Remove SECURITY_APPARMOR_BOOTPARAM_VALUEKees Cook2-17/+1
In preparation for removing CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY, this removes the soon-to-be redundant SECURITY_APPARMOR_BOOTPARAM_VALUE. Since explicit ordering via CONFIG_LSM or "lsm=" will define whether an LSM is enabled or not, this CONFIG will become effectively ignored, so remove it. However, in order to stay backward-compatible with "security=apparmor", the enable variable defaults to true. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08LSM: Separate idea of "major" LSM from "exclusive" LSMKees Cook6-4/+17
In order to both support old "security=" Legacy Major LSM selection, and handling real exclusivity, this creates LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE and updates the selection logic to handle them. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-01-08LSM: Refactor "security=" in terms of enable/disableKees Cook1-8/+20
For what are marked as the Legacy Major LSMs, make them effectively exclusive when selected on the "security=" boot parameter, to handle the future case of when a previously major LSMs become non-exclusive (e.g. when TOMOYO starts blob-sharing). Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-01-08LSM: Prepare for reorganizing "security=" logicKees Cook1-9/+8
This moves the string handling for "security=" boot parameter into a stored pointer instead of a string duplicate. This will allow easier handling of the string when switching logic to use the coming enable/disable infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
2019-01-08LSM: Tie enabling logic to presence in ordered listKees Cook2-4/+12
Until now, any LSM without an enable storage variable was considered enabled. This inverts the logic and sets defaults to true only if the LSM gets added to the ordered initialization list. (And an exception continues for the major LSMs until they are integrated into the ordered initialization in a later patch.) Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08LSM: Introduce "lsm=" for boottime LSM selectionKees Cook3-2/+19
Provide a way to explicitly choose LSM initialization order via the new "lsm=" comma-separated list of LSMs. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08LSM: Introduce CONFIG_LSMKees Cook2-5/+31
This provides a way to declare LSM initialization order via the new CONFIG_LSM. Currently only non-major LSMs are recognized. This will be expanded in future patches. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2019-01-08LSM: Build ordered list of LSMs to initializeKees Cook1-5/+53
This constructs an ordered list of LSMs to initialize, using a hard-coded list of only "integrity": minor LSMs continue to have direct hook calls, and major LSMs continue to initialize separately. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-01-08LSM: Lift LSM selection out of individual LSMsKees Cook6-53/+71
As a prerequisite to adjusting LSM selection logic in the future, this moves the selection logic up out of the individual major LSMs, making their init functions only run when actually enabled. This considers all LSMs enabled by default unless they specified an external "enable" variable. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
2019-01-08LSM: Plumb visibility into optional "enabled" stateKees Cook3-2/+5
In preparation for lifting the "is this LSM enabled?" logic out of the individual LSMs, pass in any special enabled state tracking (as needed for SELinux, AppArmor, and LoadPin). This should be an "int" to include handling any future cases where "enabled" is exposed via sysctl which has no "bool" type. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
2019-01-08LSM: Provide separate ordered initializationKees Cook1-0/+21
This provides a place for ordered LSMs to be initialized, separate from the "major" LSMs. This is mainly a copy/paste from major_lsm_init() to ordered_lsm_init(), but it will change drastically in later patches. What is not obvious in the patch is that this change moves the integrity LSM from major_lsm_init() into ordered_lsm_init(), since it is not marked with the LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR. As it is the only LSM in the "ordered" list, there is no reordering yet created. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
2019-01-08LSM: Introduce LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJORKees Cook5-0/+7
This adds a flag for the current "major" LSMs to distinguish them when we have a universal method for ordering all LSMs. It's called "legacy" since the distinction of "major" will go away in the blob-sharing world. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
2019-01-06Linux 5.0-rc1Linus Torvalds1-3/+3
2019-01-06Change mincore() to count "mapped" pages rather than "cached" pagesLinus Torvalds1-81/+13
The semantics of what "in core" means for the mincore() system call are somewhat unclear, but Linux has always (since 2.3.52, which is when mincore() was initially done) treated it as "page is available in page cache" rather than "page is mapped in the mapping". The problem with that traditional semantic is that it exposes a lot of system cache state that it really probably shouldn't, and that users shouldn't really even care about. So let's try to avoid that information leak by simply changing the semantics to be that mincore() counts actual mapped pages, not pages that might be cheaply mapped if they were faulted (note the "might be" part of the old semantics: being in the cache doesn't actually guarantee that you can access them without IO anyway, since things like network filesystems may have to revalidate the cache before use). In many ways the old semantics were somewhat insane even aside from the information leak issue. From the very beginning (and that beginning is a long time ago: 2.3.52 was released in March 2000, I think), the code had a comment saying Later we can get more picky about what "in core" means precisely. and this is that "later". Admittedly it is much later than is really comfortable. NOTE! This is a real semantic change, and it is for example known to change the output of "fincore", since that program literally does a mmmap without populating it, and then doing "mincore()" on that mapping that doesn't actually have any pages in it. I'm hoping that nobody actually has any workflow that cares, and the info leak is real. We may have to do something different if it turns out that people have valid reasons to want the old semantics, and if we can limit the information leak sanely. Cc: Kevin Easton <kevin@guarana.org> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Masatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-06Fix 'acccess_ok()' on alpha and SHLinus Torvalds2-5/+10
Commit 594cc251fdd0 ("make 'user_access_begin()' do 'access_ok()'") broke both alpha and SH booting in qemu, as noticed by Guenter Roeck. It turns out that the bug wasn't actually in that commit itself (which would have been surprising: it was mostly a no-op), but in how the addition of access_ok() to the strncpy_from_user() and strnlen_user() functions now triggered the case where those functions would test the access of the very last byte of the user address space. The string functions actually did that user range test before too, but they did it manually by just comparing against user_addr_max(). But with user_access_begin() doing the check (using "access_ok()"), it now exposed problems in the architecture implementations of that function. For example, on alpha, the access_ok() helper macro looked like this: #define __access_ok(addr, size) \ ((get_fs().seg & (addr | size | (addr+size))) == 0) and what it basically tests is of any of the high bits get set (the USER_DS masking value is 0xfffffc0000000000). And that's completely wrong for the "addr+size" check. Because it's off-by-one for the case where we check to the very end of the user address space, which is exactly what the strn*_user() functions do. Why? Because "addr+size" will be exactly the size of the address space, so trying to access the last byte of the user address space will fail the __access_ok() check, even though it shouldn't. As a result, the user string accessor functions failed consistently - because they literally don't know how long the string is going to be, and the max access is going to be that last byte of the user address space. Side note: that alpha macro is buggy for another reason too - it re-uses the arguments twice. And SH has another version of almost the exact same bug: #define __addr_ok(addr) \ ((unsigned long __force)(addr) < current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg) so far so good: yes, a user address must be below the limit. But then: #define __access_ok(addr, size) \ (__addr_ok((addr) + (size))) is wrong with the exact same off-by-one case: the case when "addr+size" is exactly _equal_ to the limit is actually perfectly fine (think "one byte access at the last address of the user address space") The SH version is actually seriously buggy in another way: it doesn't actually check for overflow, even though it did copy the _comment_ that talks about overflow. So it turns out that both SH and alpha actually have completely buggy implementations of access_ok(), but they happened to work in practice (although the SH overflow one is a serious serious security bug, not that anybody likely cares about SH security). This fixes the problems by using a similar macro on both alpha and SH. It isn't trying to be clever, the end address is based on this logic: unsigned long __ao_end = __ao_a + __ao_b - !!__ao_b; which basically says "add start and length, and then subtract one unless the length was zero". We can't subtract one for a zero length, or we'd just hit an underflow instead. For a lot of access_ok() users the length is a constant, so this isn't actually as expensive as it initially looks. Reported-and-tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-06fscrypt: add Adiantum supportEric Biggers7-188/+468
Add support for the Adiantum encryption mode to fscrypt. Adiantum is a tweakable, length-preserving encryption mode with security provably reducible to that of XChaCha12 and AES-256, subject to a security bound. It's also a true wide-block mode, unlike XTS. See the paper "Adiantum: length-preserving encryption for entry-level processors" (https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/720.pdf) for more details. Also see commit 059c2a4d8e16 ("crypto: adiantum - add Adiantum support"). On sufficiently long messages, Adiantum's bottlenecks are XChaCha12 and the NH hash function. These algorithms are fast even on processors without dedicated crypto instructions. Adiantum makes it feasible to enable storage encryption on low-end mobile devices that lack AES instructions; currently such devices are unencrypted. On ARM Cortex-A7, on 4096-byte messages Adiantum encryption is about 4 times faster than AES-256-XTS encryption; decryption is about 5 times faster. In fscrypt, Adiantum is suitable for encrypting both file contents and names. With filenames, it fixes a known weakness: when two filenames in a directory share a common prefix of >= 16 bytes, with CTS-CBC their encrypted filenames share a common prefix too, leaking information. Adiantum does not have this problem. Since Adiantum also accepts long tweaks (IVs), it's also safe to use the master key directly for Adiantum encryption rather than deriving per-file keys, provided that the per-file nonce is included in the IVs and the master key isn't used for any other encryption mode. This configuration saves memory and improves performance. A new fscrypt policy flag is added to allow users to opt-in to this configuration. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-01-06kconfig: rename generated .*conf-cfg to *conf-cfgMasahiro Yamada2-18/+19
Remove the dot-prefixing since it is just a matter of the .gitignore file. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-01-06kbuild: remove unnecessary stubs for archheader and archscriptsMasahiro Yamada1-5/+1
Make simply skips a missing rule when it is marked as .PHONY. Remove the dummy targets. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-01-06kbuild: use assignment instead of define ... endef for filechk_* rulesMasahiro Yamada6-26/+12
You do not have to use define ... endef for filechk_* rules. For simple cases, the use of assignment looks cleaner, IMHO. I updated the usage for scripts/Kbuild.include in case somebody misunderstands the 'define ... endif' is the requirement. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2019-01-06arch: remove redundant UAPI generic-y definesMasahiro Yamada24-408/+0
Now that Kbuild automatically creates asm-generic wrappers for missing mandatory headers, it is redundant to list the same headers in generic-y and mandatory-y. Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
2019-01-06kbuild: generate asm-generic wrappers if mandatory headers are missingMasahiro Yamada3-10/+10
Some time ago, Sam pointed out a certain degree of overwrap between generic-y and mandatory-y. (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/10/121) I tweaked the meaning of mandatory-y a little bit; now it defines the minimum set of ASM headers that all architectures must have. If arch does not have specific implementation of a mandatory header, Kbuild will let it fallback to the asm-generic one by automatically generating a wrapper. This will allow to drop lots of redundant generic-y defines. Previously, "mandatory" was used in the context of UAPI, but I guess this can be extended to kernel space ASM headers. Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
2019-01-06arch: remove stale comments "UAPI Header export list"Masahiro Yamada24-25/+0
These comments are leftovers of commit fcc8487d477a ("uapi: export all headers under uapi directories"). Prior to that commit, exported headers must be explicitly added to header-y. Now, all headers under the uapi/ directories are exported. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-01-06riscv: remove redundant kernel-space generic-yMasahiro Yamada1-25/+0
This commit removes redundant generic-y defines in arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild. [1] It is redundant to define the same generic-y in both arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/Kbuild and arch/$(ARCH)/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild. Remove the following generic-y: errno.h fcntl.h ioctl.h ioctls.h ipcbuf.h mman.h msgbuf.h param.h poll.h posix_types.h resource.h sembuf.h setup.h shmbuf.h signal.h socket.h sockios.h stat.h statfs.h swab.h termbits.h termios.h types.h [2] It is redundant to define generic-y when arch-specific implementation exists in arch/$(ARCH)/include/asm/*.h Remove the following generic-y: cacheflush.h module.h Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-01-06kbuild: change filechk to surround the given command with { }Masahiro Yamada7-12/+14
filechk_* rules often consist of multiple 'echo' lines. They must be surrounded with { } or ( ) to work correctly. Otherwise, only the string from the last 'echo' would be written into the target. Let's take care of that in the 'filechk' in scripts/Kbuild.include to clean up filechk_* rules. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>