| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Provide a helper to obtain the parent device fwnode without first
parsing the remote-endpoint as per fwnode_graph_get_remote_port_parent.
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Add fwnode_graph_get_remote_node() function which is equivalent to
of_graph_get_remote_node() on OF.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Add fwnode_device_is_available() to tell whether the device corresponding
to a certain fwnode_handle is available for use.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
In order to differentiate the functionality between dropping a reference
to the node (or not) for the benefit of OF, introduce
fwnode_get_next_parent().
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Similar to OF endpoints, endpoint type nodes can be also supported on
ACPI. In order to make it possible for drivers to ignore the matter,
add a type for fwnode_endpoint and a function to parse them.
On ACPI, find the child node index instead of relying on the "endpoint"
property.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The function to obtain a fwnode related to a struct device is useful for
drivers that use the fwnode property API: it allows not being aware of the
underlying firmware implementation.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
fwnode_handle_get() is used to obtain a reference to a fwnode_handle
container. In this case this is OF specific struct device_node.
This complements fwnode_handle_put() which is already implemented.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
This follows DT implementation of of_graph_* APIs but we call them
fwnode_graph_* instead. For DT nodes the existing of_graph_* implementation
will be used. For ACPI we use the new ACPI graph implementation instead.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Since now we have means to enumerate all children of any fwnode even in
ACPI we can implement fwnode_get_named_child_node(). This is similar than
device_get_named_child_node() with the exception that it can be called to
any fwnode handle. Make device_get_named_child_node() call directly this
new function.
This is useful in cases where we need to be able to find child nodes which
are not direct descendants of the parent device.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The ACPI _DSD hierarchical data extension makes it possible to have
hierarchies deeper than one level in similar way than DT allows. These
"subsubnodes" have not been accessible because device property
implementation only provides device_get_next_child_node() that is limited
to direct descendants of a device.
We need this ability in order support things like remote endpoints
currently supported in DT with of_graph_* APIs.
Modify acpi_get_next_subnode() to accept fwnode handle instead and update
callers accordingly. Also add a new function fwnode_get_next_child_node()
that works directly with fwnodes and modify device_get_next_child_node() to
call it directly. While there add a macro fwnode_for_each_child_node()
analogous to the current device_for_each_child_node() but it works with
fwnodes instead of devices.
Link: http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-hierarchical-data-extension-UUID-v1.pdf
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Now that ACPI has support for returning parent firmware node for both types
of nodes we can expose this to others as well. This adds a new function
fwnode_get_parent() that can be used for DT and ACPI nodes to retrieve the
parent firmware node.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
When augmenting ACPI-enumerated devices with additional property data based
on DMI info, a module has often several potential property sets, with only
one being active on a given box. In order to save memory it should be
possible to mark everything and __initdata or __initconst, execute DMI
match early, and duplicate relevant properties. Then kernel will discard
the rest of them.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Data that is fed into property arrays should not be modified, so let's mark
relevant pointers as const. This will allow us making source arrays as
const/__initconst.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
There is no reason why statically defined properties should be modifiable,
so let's make device_add_properties() and the rest of pset_*() functions to
take const pointers to properties.
This will allow us to mark properties as const/__initconst at definition
sites.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
This fixes commit d76eebfa175e ("include/linux/property.h: fix build
issues with gcc-4.4.4").
With that commit we get the following compile error when using the
PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY macro.
include/linux/property.h:201:39: error: `u32_data' undeclared (first
use in this function)
PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY(_name_, u32, _val_)
^
include/linux/property.h:193:17: note: in definition of macro
`PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY'
{ .pointer = { _type_##_data = _val_ } }, \
^
This needs a '.' to reference the union member. It seems this was just
overlooked here since it is done correctly in similar constructs in
other parts of the original commit.
This fix is in preparation of upcoming commits that will use this macro.
Fixes: commit d76eebfa175e ("include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2de3b929290d88a723ed829a3e3cbd02044714df.1475114627.git.johnyoun@synopsys.com
Signed-off-by: John Youn <johnyoun@synopsys.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
For device nodes in both DT and ACPI, it possible to have named
child nodes which contain properties (an existing example being
gpio-leds). This adds a function to find a named child node for
a device which can be used by drivers for property retrieval.
For DT data node name matching, of_node_cmp() and similar functions
are made available outside of CONFIG_OF block so the new function
can reference these for DT and non-DT builds.
For ACPI data node name matching, a helper function is also added
which returns false if CONFIG_ACPI is not set, otherwise it
performs a string comparison on the data node name. This avoids
using the acpi_data_node struct for non CONFIG_ACPI builds,
which would otherwise cause a build failure.
Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Acked-by: Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
function can just create the instance of it on its own and
bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
This renames device_add_property_set() to
device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
property_set.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Just a style fix, no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
gcc-4.4.4 has problems with initialization of anonymous unions:
drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c:30: error: unknown field 'value' specified in initializer
work around this by crafting the initializers in a manner which the
compiler can handle.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
It is convenient if the property set associated with the device secondary
firmware node is a copy of the original. This allows passing property set
from a stack for example for devices created dynamically. This also ties
the property set lifetime to the associated device.
Because of that we provide new function device_remove_property_set() that
is used to disassociate and release memory allocated for the property set.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
There is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
We may save a lot of lines of code and space by keeping single values inside
the struct property_entry. Refactor the implementation to do so.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Instead of using the type and nval fields we will use length (in bytes) of the
value. The sanity check is done in the accessors.
The built-in property accessors are split in the same way such as device tree.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
These DMA APIs are replaced with the newer versions, which return
the enum dev_dma_attr. So, we can safely remove them.
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The function device_dma_is_coherent() does not sufficiently
communicate device DMA attributes. Instead, this patch introduces
device_get_dma_attr(), which returns enum dev_dma_attr.
It replaces the acpi_check_dma(), which will be removed in
subsequent patch.
This also provides a convenient function, device_dma_supported(),
to check DMA support of the specified device.
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
A device could have one of the following DMA attributes:
* DMA not supported
* DMA non-coherent
* DMA coherent
So, this patch introduces enum dev_dma_attribute. This will be used by
new APIs introduced in later patches.
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Sometimes it is useful to be able to extract an index of certain string
value from an array of strings. A typical use case is to give a name to a
DMA channel, PWM, clock and so on.
Provide an implementation using unified device property accessors that
follows of_property_match_string() but works for all supported fwnodes.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
OF has some helper functions for parsing MAC and PHY settings.
In cases where the platform is providing this information rather
than the device itself, there needs to be similar functions for ACPI.
These functions are slightly modified versions of the ones in
of_net which can use information provided via DT or ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI,
need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and
acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute.
This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device
property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate
interface based on the booting architecture.
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties
to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used
by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT
nor ACPI) is present for the given device.
Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure.
An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null
entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct
property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct
device using device_add_property_set(). That will cause the
device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source
of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or
an ACPI companion device object associated with it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Now that we have struct fwnode_handle, we can use that to point to
ACPI companions from struct device objects instead of pointing to
struct acpi_device directly.
There are two benefits from that. First, the somewhat ugly and
hackish struct acpi_dev_node can be dropped and, second, the same
struct fwnode_handle pointer can be used in the future to point
to other (non-ACPI) firmware device node types.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
|
|
Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from
device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are
no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been
created yet or they do not exist at all).
The following functions are provided:
fwnode_property_present()
fwnode_property_read_u8()
fwnode_property_read_u16()
fwnode_property_read_u32()
fwnode_property_read_u64()
fwnode_property_read_string()
fwnode_property_read_u8_array()
fwnode_property_read_u16_array()
fwnode_property_read_u32_array()
fwnode_property_read_u64_array()
fwnode_property_read_string_array()
in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added
previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct
fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object
(depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be
obtained.
Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the
children of the device description object associated with a given
device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the
number of a given device's child nodes.
The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees.
Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Add a uniform interface by which device drivers can request device
properties from the platform firmware by providing a property name
and the corresponding data type. The purpose of it is to help to
write portable code that won't depend on any particular platform
firmware interface.
The following general helper functions are added:
device_property_present()
device_property_read_u8()
device_property_read_u16()
device_property_read_u32()
device_property_read_u64()
device_property_read_string()
device_property_read_u8_array()
device_property_read_u16_array()
device_property_read_u32_array()
device_property_read_u64_array()
device_property_read_string_array()
The first one allows the caller to check if the given property is
present. The next 5 of them allow single-valued properties of
various types to be retrieved in a uniform way. The remaining 5 are
for reading properties with multiple values (arrays of either numbers
or strings).
The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees.
This change set includes material from Mika Westerberg and Aaron Lu.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
Kieran Bingham
Sakari Ailus
Mika Westerberg
Dmitry Torokhov
John Youn
Adam Thomson
Heikki Krogerus
Andy Shevchenko
Andrew Morton
Suthikulpanit, Suravee
Jeremy Linton
Rafael J. Wysocki