| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This patch teach verifier about the new BPF_JMP32 instruction class.
Verifier need to treat it similar as the existing BPF_JMP class.
A BPF_JMP32 insn needs to go through all checks that have been done on
BPF_JMP.
Also, verifier is doing runtime optimizations based on the extra info
conditional jump instruction could offer, especially when the comparison is
between constant and register that the value range of the register could be
improved based on the comparison results. These code are updated
accordingly.
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
The current min/max code does both signed and unsigned comparisons against
the input argument "val" which is "u64" and there is explicit type casting
when the comparison is signed.
As we will need slightly more complexer type casting when JMP32 introduced,
it is better to host the signed type casting. This makes the code more
clean with ignorable runtime overhead.
Also, code for J*GE/GT/LT/LE and JEQ/JNE are very similar, this patch
combine them.
The main purpose for this refactor is to make sure the min/max code will
still be readable and with minimum code duplication after JMP32 introduced.
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Let offload JITs know when instructions are replaced and optimized
out, so they can update their state appropriately. The optimizations
are best effort, if JIT returns an error from any callback verifier
will stop notifying it as state may now be out of sync, but the
verifier continues making progress.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
The communication between the verifier and advanced JITs is based
on instruction indexes. We have to keep them stable throughout
the optimizations otherwise referring to a particular instruction
gets messy quickly.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Unconditional branches by 0 instructions are basically noops
but they can result from earlier optimizations, e.g. a conditional
jumps which would never be taken or a conditional jump around
dead code.
Remove those branches.
v0.2:
- s/opt_remove_dead_branches/opt_remove_nops/ (Jiong).
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of overwriting dead code with jmp -1 instructions
remove it completely for root. Adjust verifier state and
line info appropriately.
v2:
- adjust func_info (Alexei);
- make sure first instruction retains line info (Alexei).
v4: (Yonghong)
- remove unnecessary if (!insn to remove) checks;
- always keep last line info if first live instruction lacks one.
v5: (Martin Lau)
- improve and clarify comments.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Loading programs with dead code becomes more and more
common, as people begin to patch constants at load time.
Turn conditional jumps to unconditional ones, to avoid
potential branch misprediction penalty.
This optimization is enabled for privileged users only.
For branches which just fall through we could just mark
them as not seen and have dead code removal take care of
them, but that seems less clean.
v0.2:
- don't call capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) twice (Jiong).
v3:
- fix GCC warning;
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
In preparation for code removal change parameters to branch
and call adjustment functions to be more universal. The
current parameters assume we are patching a single instruction
with a longer set.
A diagram may help reading the change, this is for the patch
single case, patching instruction 1 with a replacement of 4:
____
0 |____|
1 |____| <-- pos ^
2 | | <-- end old ^ |
3 | | | delta | len
4 |____| | | (patch region)
5 | | <-- end new v v
6 |____|
end_old = pos + 1
end_new = pos + delta + 1
If we are before the patch region - curr variable and the target
are fully in old coordinates (hence comparing against end_old).
If we are after the region curr is in new coordinates (hence
the comparison to end_new) but target is in mixed coordinates,
so we just check if it falls before end_new, and if so it needs
the adjustment.
Note that we will not fix up branches which land in removed region
in case of removal, which should be okay, as we are only going to
remove dead code.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
For better performance analysis of BPF programs, this patch introduces
PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT, a new perf_event_type that exposes BPF program
load/unload information to user space.
Each BPF program may contain up to BPF_MAX_SUBPROGS (256) sub programs.
The following example shows kernel symbols for a BPF program with 7 sub
programs:
ffffffffa0257cf9 t bpf_prog_b07ccb89267cf242_F
ffffffffa02592e1 t bpf_prog_2dcecc18072623fc_F
ffffffffa025b0e9 t bpf_prog_bb7a405ebaec5d5c_F
ffffffffa025dd2c t bpf_prog_a7540d4a39ec1fc7_F
ffffffffa025fcca t bpf_prog_05762d4ade0e3737_F
ffffffffa026108f t bpf_prog_db4bd11e35df90d4_F
ffffffffa0263f00 t bpf_prog_89d64e4abf0f0126_F
ffffffffa0257cf9 t bpf_prog_ae31629322c4b018__dummy_tracepoi
When a bpf program is loaded, PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL is generated for each
of these sub programs. Therefore, PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT is not needed
for simple profiling.
For annotation, user space need to listen to PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT and
gather more information about these (sub) programs via sys_bpf.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradeaed.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190117161521.1341602-4-songliubraving@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
During review I noticed that inner meta map setup for map in
map is buggy in that it does not propagate all needed data
from the reference map which the verifier is later accessing.
In particular one such case is index masking to prevent out of
bounds access under speculative execution due to missing the
map's unpriv_array/index_mask field propagation. Fix this such
that the verifier is generating the correct code for inlined
lookups in case of unpriviledged use.
Before patch (test_verifier's 'map in map access' dump):
# bpftool prog dump xla id 3
0: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
1: (bf) r2 = r10
2: (07) r2 += -4
3: (18) r1 = map[id:4]
5: (07) r1 += 272 |
6: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0) |
7: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+6 | Inlined map in map lookup
8: (54) (u32) r0 &= (u32) 0 | with index masking for
9: (67) r0 <<= 3 | map->unpriv_array.
10: (0f) r0 += r1 |
11: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) |
12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1 |
13: (05) goto pc+1 |
14: (b7) r0 = 0 |
15: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+11
16: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
17: (bf) r2 = r10
18: (07) r2 += -4
19: (bf) r1 = r0
20: (07) r1 += 272 |
21: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0) | Index masking missing (!)
22: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+3 | for inner map despite
23: (67) r0 <<= 3 | map->unpriv_array set.
24: (0f) r0 += r1 |
25: (05) goto pc+1 |
26: (b7) r0 = 0 |
27: (b7) r0 = 0
28: (95) exit
After patch:
# bpftool prog dump xla id 1
0: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
1: (bf) r2 = r10
2: (07) r2 += -4
3: (18) r1 = map[id:2]
5: (07) r1 += 272 |
6: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0) |
7: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+6 | Same inlined map in map lookup
8: (54) (u32) r0 &= (u32) 0 | with index masking due to
9: (67) r0 <<= 3 | map->unpriv_array.
10: (0f) r0 += r1 |
11: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) |
12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1 |
13: (05) goto pc+1 |
14: (b7) r0 = 0 |
15: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+12
16: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
17: (bf) r2 = r10
18: (07) r2 += -4
19: (bf) r1 = r0
20: (07) r1 += 272 |
21: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0) |
22: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+4 | Now fixed inlined inner map
23: (54) (u32) r0 &= (u32) 0 | lookup with proper index masking
24: (67) r0 <<= 3 | for map->unpriv_array.
25: (0f) r0 += r1 |
26: (05) goto pc+1 |
27: (b7) r0 = 0 |
28: (b7) r0 = 0
29: (95) exit
Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough
and this place in the code produced a warnings (W=1).
This commit removes the following warning:
kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:719:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Initially in commit 69b693f0aefa ("bpf: btf: Introduce BPF Type Format
(BTF)") the function 'btf_name_offset_valid' was introduced as static
function it was later on changed to a non-static one, and then finally
in commit 23127b33ec80 ("bpf: Create a new btf_name_by_offset() for
non type name use case") the function prototype was removed.
Revert back to original implementation and make the function static.
Remove warning triggered with W=1:
kernel/bpf/btf.c:470:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'btf_name_offset_valid' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Fixes: 23127b33ec80 ("bpf: Create a new btf_name_by_offset() for non type name use case")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
When returning BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP from stack_map_get_build_id_offset,
make sure that build_id field is empty. Since we are using percpu
free list, there is a possibility that we might reuse some previous
bpf_stack_build_id with non-zero build_id.
Fixes: 615755a77b24 ("bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address")
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Build-id length is not fixed to 20, it can be (`man ld` /--build-id):
* 128-bit (uuid)
* 160-bit (sha1)
* any length specified in ld --build-id=0xhexstring
To fix the issue of missing BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_VALID for shorter build-ids,
assume that build-id is somewhere in the range of 1 .. 20.
Set the remaining bytes to zero.
v2:
* don't introduce new "len = min(BPF_BUILD_ID_SIZE, nhdr->n_descsz)",
we already know that nhdr->n_descsz <= BPF_BUILD_ID_SIZE if we enter
this 'if' condition
Fixes: 615755a77b24 ("bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address")
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
An older GCC compiler complains:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function 'bpf_check':
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4***:13: error: 'prev_offset' may be used uninitialized
in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
} else if (krecord[i].insn_offset <= prev_offset) {
^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4***:38: note: 'prev_offset' was declared here
u32 i, nfuncs, urec_size, min_size, prev_offset;
Although the compiler is wrong here, the patch makes sure
that prev_offset is always initialized, just to silence the warning.
v2: fix a spelling error in the commit message.
Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Currently, btf only supports up to 64-bit integer.
On the other hand, 128bit support for gcc and clang
has existed for a long time. For example, both gcc 4.8
and llvm 3.7 supports types "__int128" and
"unsigned __int128" for virtually all 64bit architectures
including bpf.
The requirement for __int128 support comes from two areas:
. bpf program may use __int128. For example, some bcc tools
(https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/tree/master/tools),
mostly tcp v6 related, tcpstates.py, tcpaccept.py, etc.,
are using __int128 to represent the ipv6 addresses.
. linux itself is using __int128 types. Hence supporting
__int128 type in BTF is required for vmlinux BTF,
which will be used by "compile once and run everywhere"
and other projects.
For 128bit integer, instead of base-10, hex numbers are pretty
printed out as large decimal number is hard to decipher, e.g.,
for ipv6 addresses.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Commit 9d5f9f701b18 ("bpf: btf: fix struct/union/fwd types
with kind_flag") introduced kind_flag and used bitfield_size
in the btf_member to directly pretty print member values.
The commit contained a bug where the incorrect parameters could be
passed to function btf_bitfield_seq_show(). The bits_offset
parameter in the function expects a value less than 8.
Instead, the member offset in the structure is passed.
The below is btf_bitfield_seq_show() func signature:
void btf_bitfield_seq_show(void *data, u8 bits_offset,
u8 nr_bits, struct seq_file *m)
both bits_offset and nr_bits are u8 type. If the bitfield
member offset is greater than 256, incorrect value will
be printed.
This patch fixed the issue by calculating correct proper
data offset and bits_offset similar to non kind_flag case.
Fixes: 9d5f9f701b18 ("bpf: btf: fix struct/union/fwd types with kind_flag")
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
As Naresh reported, test_stacktrace_build_id() causes panic on i386 and
arm32 systems. This is caused by page_address() returns NULL in certain
cases.
This patch fixes this error by using kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic instead
of page_address.
Fixes: 615755a77b24 (" bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address")
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
While 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer
arithmetic") took care of rejecting alu op on pointer when e.g. pointer
came from two different map values with different map properties such as
value size, Jann reported that a case was not covered yet when a given
alu op is used in both "ptr_reg += reg" and "numeric_reg += reg" from
different branches where we would incorrectly try to sanitize based
on the pointer's limit. Catch this corner case and reject the program
instead.
Fixes: 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Nobody has actually used the type (VERIFY_READ vs VERIFY_WRITE) argument
of the user address range verification function since we got rid of the
old racy i386-only code to walk page tables by hand.
It existed because the original 80386 would not honor the write protect
bit when in kernel mode, so you had to do COW by hand before doing any
user access. But we haven't supported that in a long time, and these
days the 'type' argument is a purely historical artifact.
A discussion about extending 'user_access_begin()' to do the range
checking resulted this patch, because there is no way we're going to
move the old VERIFY_xyz interface to that model. And it's best done at
the end of the merge window when I've done most of my merges, so let's
just get this done once and for all.
This patch was mostly done with a sed-script, with manual fix-ups for
the cases that weren't of the trivial 'access_ok(VERIFY_xyz' form.
There were a couple of notable cases:
- csky still had the old "verify_area()" name as an alias.
- the iter_iov code had magical hardcoded knowledge of the actual
values of VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} (not that they mattered, since nothing
really used it)
- microblaze used the type argument for a debug printout
but other than those oddities this should be a total no-op patch.
I tried to fix up all architectures, did fairly extensive grepping for
access_ok() uses, and the changes are trivial, but I may have missed
something. Any missed conversion should be trivially fixable, though.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Jann reported that the original commit back in b2157399cc98
("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") was not sufficient
to stop CPU from speculating out of bounds memory access:
While b2157399cc98 only focussed on masking array map access
for unprivileged users for tail calls and data access such
that the user provided index gets sanitized from BPF program
and syscall side, there is still a more generic form affected
from BPF programs that applies to most maps that hold user
data in relation to dynamic map access when dealing with
unknown scalars or "slow" known scalars as access offset, for
example:
- Load a map value pointer into R6
- Load an index into R7
- Do a slow computation (e.g. with a memory dependency) that
loads a limit into R8 (e.g. load the limit from a map for
high latency, then mask it to make the verifier happy)
- Exit if R7 >= R8 (mispredicted branch)
- Load R0 = R6[R7]
- Load R0 = R6[R0]
For unknown scalars there are two options in the BPF verifier
where we could derive knowledge from in order to guarantee
safe access to the memory: i) While </>/<=/>= variants won't
allow to derive any lower or upper bounds from the unknown
scalar where it would be safe to add it to the map value
pointer, it is possible through ==/!= test however. ii) another
option is to transform the unknown scalar into a known scalar,
for example, through ALU ops combination such as R &= <imm>
followed by R |= <imm> or any similar combination where the
original information from the unknown scalar would be destroyed
entirely leaving R with a constant. The initial slow load still
precedes the latter ALU ops on that register, so the CPU
executes speculatively from that point. Once we have the known
scalar, any compare operation would work then. A third option
only involving registers with known scalars could be crafted
as described in [0] where a CPU port (e.g. Slow Int unit)
would be filled with many dependent computations such that
the subsequent condition depending on its outcome has to wait
for evaluation on its execution port and thereby executing
speculatively if the speculated code can be scheduled on a
different execution port, or any other form of mistraining
as described in [1], for example. Given this is not limited
to only unknown scalars, not only map but also stack access
is affected since both is accessible for unprivileged users
and could potentially be used for out of bounds access under
speculation.
In order to prevent any of these cases, the verifier is now
sanitizing pointer arithmetic on the offset such that any
out of bounds speculation would be masked in a way where the
pointer arithmetic result in the destination register will
stay unchanged, meaning offset masked into zero similar as
in array_index_nospec() case. With regards to implementation,
there are three options that were considered: i) new insn
for sanitation, ii) push/pop insn and sanitation as inlined
BPF, iii) reuse of ax register and sanitation as inlined BPF.
Option i) has the downside that we end up using from reserved
bits in the opcode space, but also that we would require
each JIT to emit masking as native arch opcodes meaning
mitigation would have slow adoption till everyone implements
it eventually which is counter-productive. Option ii) and iii)
have both in common that a temporary register is needed in
order to implement the sanitation as inlined BPF since we
are not allowed to modify the source register. While a push /
pop insn in ii) would be useful to have in any case, it
requires once again that every JIT needs to implement it
first. While possible, amount of changes needed would also
be unsuitable for a -stable patch. Therefore, the path which
has fewer changes, less BPF instructions for the mitigation
and does not require anything to be changed in the JITs is
option iii) which this work is pursuing. The ax register is
already mapped to a register in all JITs (modulo arm32 where
it's mapped to stack as various other BPF registers there)
and used in constant blinding for JITs-only so far. It can
be reused for verifier rewrites under certain constraints.
The interpreter's tmp "register" has therefore been remapped
into extending the register set with hidden ax register and
reusing that for a number of instructions that needed the
prior temporary variable internally (e.g. div, mod). This
allows for zero increase in stack space usage in the interpreter,
and enables (restricted) generic use in rewrites otherwise as
long as such a patchlet does not make use of these instructions.
The sanitation mask is dynamic and relative to the offset the
map value or stack pointer currently holds.
There are various cases that need to be taken under consideration
for the masking, e.g. such operation could look as follows:
ptr += val or val += ptr or ptr -= val. Thus, the value to be
sanitized could reside either in source or in destination
register, and the limit is different depending on whether
the ALU op is addition or subtraction and depending on the
current known and bounded offset. The limit is derived as
follows: limit := max_value_size - (smin_value + off). For
subtraction: limit := umax_value + off. This holds because
we do not allow any pointer arithmetic that would
temporarily go out of bounds or would have an unknown
value with mixed signed bounds where it is unclear at
verification time whether the actual runtime value would
be either negative or positive. For example, we have a
derived map pointer value with constant offset and bounded
one, so limit based on smin_value works because the verifier
requires that statically analyzed arithmetic on the pointer
must be in bounds, and thus it checks if resulting
smin_value + off and umax_value + off is still within map
value bounds at time of arithmetic in addition to time of
access. Similarly, for the case of stack access we derive
the limit as follows: MAX_BPF_STACK + off for subtraction
and -off for the case of addition where off := ptr_reg->off +
ptr_reg->var_off.value. Subtraction is a special case for
the masking which can be in form of ptr += -val, ptr -= -val,
or ptr -= val. In the first two cases where we know that
the value is negative, we need to temporarily negate the
value in order to do the sanitation on a positive value
where we later swap the ALU op, and restore original source
register if the value was in source.
The sanitation of pointer arithmetic alone is still not fully
sufficient as is, since a scenario like the following could
happen ...
PTR += 0x1000 (e.g. K-based imm)
PTR -= BIG_NUMBER_WITH_SLOW_COMPARISON
PTR += 0x1000
PTR -= BIG_NUMBER_WITH_SLOW_COMPARISON
[...]
... which under speculation could end up as ...
PTR += 0x1000
PTR -= 0 [ truncated by mitigation ]
PTR += 0x1000
PTR -= 0 [ truncated by mitigation ]
[...]
... and therefore still access out of bounds. To prevent such
case, the verifier is also analyzing safety for potential out
of bounds access under speculative execution. Meaning, it is
also simulating pointer access under truncation. We therefore
"branch off" and push the current verification state after the
ALU operation with known 0 to the verification stack for later
analysis. Given the current path analysis succeeded it is
likely that the one under speculation can be pruned. In any
case, it is also subject to existing complexity limits and
therefore anything beyond this point will be rejected. In
terms of pruning, it needs to be ensured that the verification
state from speculative execution simulation must never prune
a non-speculative execution path, therefore, we mark verifier
state accordingly at the time of push_stack(). If verifier
detects out of bounds access under speculative execution from
one of the possible paths that includes a truncation, it will
reject such program.
Given we mask every reg-based pointer arithmetic for
unprivileged programs, we've been looking into how it could
affect real-world programs in terms of size increase. As the
majority of programs are targeted for privileged-only use
case, we've unconditionally enabled masking (with its alu
restrictions on top of it) for privileged programs for the
sake of testing in order to check i) whether they get rejected
in its current form, and ii) by how much the number of
instructions and size will increase. We've tested this by
using Katran, Cilium and test_l4lb from the kernel selftests.
For Katran we've evaluated balancer_kern.o, Cilium bpf_lxc.o
and an older test object bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o and l4lb
we've used test_l4lb.o as well as test_l4lb_noinline.o. We
found that none of the programs got rejected by the verifier
with this change, and that impact is rather minimal to none.
balancer_kern.o had 13,904 bytes (1,738 insns) xlated and
7,797 bytes JITed before and after the change. Most complex
program in bpf_lxc.o had 30,544 bytes (3,817 insns) xlated
and 18,538 bytes JITed before and after and none of the other
tail call programs in bpf_lxc.o had any changes either. For
the older bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o object we found a small
increase from 20,616 bytes (2,576 insns) and 12,536 bytes JITed
before to 20,664 bytes (2,582 insns) and 12,558 bytes JITed
after the change. Other programs from that object file had
similar small increase. Both test_l4lb.o had no change and
remained at 6,544 bytes (817 insns) xlated and 3,401 bytes
JITed and for test_l4lb_noinline.o constant at 5,080 bytes
(634 insns) xlated and 3,313 bytes JITed. This can be explained
in that LLVM typically optimizes stack based pointer arithmetic
by using K-based operations and that use of dynamic map access
is not overly frequent. However, in future we may decide to
optimize the algorithm further under known guarantees from
branch and value speculation. Latter seems also unclear in
terms of prediction heuristics that today's CPUs apply as well
as whether there could be collisions in e.g. the predictor's
Value History/Pattern Table for triggering out of bounds access,
thus masking is performed unconditionally at this point but could
be subject to relaxation later on. We were generally also
brainstorming various other approaches for mitigation, but the
blocker was always lack of available registers at runtime and/or
overhead for runtime tracking of limits belonging to a specific
pointer. Thus, we found this to be minimally intrusive under
given constraints.
With that in place, a simple example with sanitized access on
unprivileged load at post-verification time looks as follows:
# bpftool prog dump xlated id 282
[...]
28: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0)
29: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r7 +8)
30: (57) r1 &= 15
31: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r0 +4608)
32: (57) r3 &= 1
33: (47) r3 |= 1
34: (2d) if r2 > r3 goto pc+19
35: (b4) (u32) r11 = (u32) 20479 |
36: (1f) r11 -= r2 | Dynamic sanitation for pointer
37: (4f) r11 |= r2 | arithmetic with registers
38: (87) r11 = -r11 | containing bounded or known
39: (c7) r11 s>>= 63 | scalars in order to prevent
40: (5f) r11 &= r2 | out of bounds speculation.
41: (0f) r4 += r11 |
42: (71) r4 = *(u8 *)(r4 +0)
43: (6f) r4 <<= r1
[...]
For the case where the scalar sits in the destination register
as opposed to the source register, the following code is emitted
for the above example:
[...]
16: (b4) (u32) r11 = (u32) 20479
17: (1f) r11 -= r2
18: (4f) r11 |= r2
19: (87) r11 = -r11
20: (c7) r11 s>>= 63
21: (5f) r2 &= r11
22: (0f) r2 += r0
23: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)
[...]
JIT blinding example with non-conflicting use of r10:
[...]
d5: je 0x0000000000000106 _
d7: mov 0x0(%rax),%edi |
da: mov $0xf153246,%r10d | Index load from map value and
e0: xor $0xf153259,%r10 | (const blinded) mask with 0x1f.
e7: and %r10,%rdi |_
ea: mov $0x2f,%r10d |
f0: sub %rdi,%r10 | Sanitized addition. Both use r10
f3: or %rdi,%r10 | but do not interfere with each
f6: neg %r10 | other. (Neither do these instructions
f9: sar $0x3f,%r10 | interfere with the use of ax as temp
fd: and %r10,%rdi | in interpreter.)
100: add %rax,%rdi |_
103: mov 0x0(%rdi),%eax
[...]
Tested that it fixes Jann's reproducer, and also checked that test_verifier
and test_progs suite with interpreter, JIT and JIT with hardening enabled
on x86-64 and arm64 runs successfully.
[0] Speculose: Analyzing the Security Implications of Speculative
Execution in CPUs, Giorgi Maisuradze and Christian Rossow,
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.04084.pdf
[1] A Systematic Evaluation of Transient Execution Attacks and
Defenses, Claudio Canella, Jo Van Bulck, Michael Schwarz,
Moritz Lipp, Benjamin von Berg, Philipp Ortner, Frank Piessens,
Dmitry Evtyushkin, Daniel Gruss,
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.05441.pdf
Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
In check_map_access() we probe actual bounds through __check_map_access()
with offset of reg->smin_value + off for lower bound and offset of
reg->umax_value + off for the upper bound. However, even though the
reg->smin_value could have a negative value, the final result of the
sum with off could be positive when pointer arithmetic with known and
unknown scalars is combined. In this case we reject the program with
an error such as "R<x> min value is negative, either use unsigned index
or do a if (index >=0) check." even though the access itself would be
fine. Therefore extend the check to probe whether the actual resulting
reg->smin_value + off is less than zero.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
For unknown scalars of mixed signed bounds, meaning their smin_value is
negative and their smax_value is positive, we need to reject arithmetic
with pointer to map value. For unprivileged the goal is to mask every
map pointer arithmetic and this cannot reliably be done when it is
unknown at verification time whether the scalar value is negative or
positive. Given this is a corner case, the likelihood of breaking should
be very small.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Restrict stack pointer arithmetic for unprivileged users in that
arithmetic itself must not go out of bounds as opposed to the actual
access later on. Therefore after each adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() with
a stack pointer as a destination we simulate a check_stack_access()
of 1 byte on the destination and once that fails the program is
rejected for unprivileged program loads. This is analog to map
value pointer arithmetic and needed for masking later on.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Restrict map value pointer arithmetic for unprivileged users in that
arithmetic itself must not go out of bounds as opposed to the actual
access later on. Therefore after each adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() with a
map value pointer as a destination it will simulate a check_map_access()
of 1 byte on the destination and once that fails the program is rejected
for unprivileged program loads. We use this later on for masking any
pointer arithmetic with the remainder of the map value space. The
likelihood of breaking any existing real-world unprivileged eBPF
program is very small for this corner case.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Right now we are using BPF ax register in JIT for constant blinding as
well as in interpreter as temporary variable. Verifier will not be able
to use it simply because its use will get overridden from the former in
bpf_jit_blind_insn(). However, it can be made to work in that blinding
will be skipped if there is prior use in either source or destination
register on the instruction. Taking constraints of ax into account, the
verifier is then open to use it in rewrites under some constraints. Note,
ax register already has mappings in every eBPF JIT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
This change moves the on-stack 64 bit tmp variable in ___bpf_prog_run()
into the hidden ax register. The latter is currently only used in JITs
for constant blinding as a temporary scratch register, meaning the BPF
interpreter will never see the use of ax. Therefore it is safe to use
it for the cases where tmp has been used earlier. This is needed to later
on allow restricted hidden use of ax in both interpreter and JITs.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Move prev_insn_idx and insn_idx from the do_check() function into
the verifier environment, so they can be read inside the various
helper functions for handling the instructions. It's easier to put
this into the environment rather than changing all call-sites only
to pass it along. insn_idx is useful in particular since this later
on allows to hold state in env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2018-12-21
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
There is a merge conflict in test_verifier.c. Result looks as follows:
[...]
},
{
"calls: cross frame pruning",
.insns = {
[...]
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
.errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr = "!read_ok",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
"jset: functional",
.insns = {
[...]
{
"jset: unknown const compare not taken",
.insns = {
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
.errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.errstr = "!read_ok",
.result = REJECT,
},
[...]
{
"jset: range",
.insns = {
[...]
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
.result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
The main changes are:
1) Various BTF related improvements in order to get line info
working. Meaning, verifier will now annotate the corresponding
BPF C code to the error log, from Martin and Yonghong.
2) Implement support for raw BPF tracepoints in modules, from Matt.
3) Add several improvements to verifier state logic, namely speeding
up stacksafe check, optimizations for stack state equivalence
test and safety checks for liveness analysis, from Alexei.
4) Teach verifier to make use of BPF_JSET instruction, add several
test cases to kselftests and remove nfp specific JSET optimization
now that verifier has awareness, from Jakub.
5) Improve BPF verifier's slot_type marking logic in order to
allow more stack slot sharing, from Jiong.
6) Add sk_msg->size member for context access and add set of fixes
and improvements to make sock_map with kTLS usable with openssl
based applications, from John.
7) Several cleanups and documentation updates in bpftool as well as
auto-mount of tracefs for "bpftool prog tracelog" command,
from Quentin.
8) Include sub-program tags from now on in bpf_prog_info in order to
have a reliable way for user space to get all tags of the program
e.g. needed for kallsyms correlation, from Song.
9) Add BTF annotations for cgroup_local_storage BPF maps and
implement bpf fs pretty print support, from Roman.
10) Fix bpftool in order to allow for cross-compilation, from Ivan.
11) Update of bpftool license to GPLv2-only + BSD-2-Clause in order
to be compatible with libbfd and allow for Debian packaging,
from Jakub.
12) Remove an obsolete prog->aux sanitation in dump and get rid of
version check for prog load, from Daniel.
13) Fix a memory leak in libbpf's line info handling, from Prashant.
14) Fix cpumap's frame alignment for build_skb() so that skb_shared_info
does not get unaligned, from Jesper.
15) Fix test_progs kselftest to work with older compilers which are less
smart in optimizing (and thus throwing build error), from Stanislav.
16) Cleanup and simplify AF_XDP socket teardown, from Björn.
17) Fix sk lookup in BPF kselftest's test_sock_addr with regards
to netns_id argument, from Andrey.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The frame_size passed to build_skb must be aligned, else it is
possible that the embedded struct skb_shared_info gets unaligned.
For correctness make sure that xdpf->headroom in included in the
alignment. No upstream drivers can hit this, as all XDP drivers provide
an aligned headroom. This was discovered when playing with implementing
XDP support for mvneta, which have a 2 bytes DSA header, and this
Marvell ARM64 platform didn't like doing atomic operations on an
unaligned skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref addresses.
Fixes: 1c601d829ab0 ("bpf: cpumap xdp_buff to skb conversion and allocation")
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Lots of conflicts, by happily all cases of overlapping
changes, parallel adds, things of that nature.
Thanks to Stephen Rothwell, Saeed Mahameed, and others
for their guidance in these resolutions.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Reorder the calls to check_max_stack_depth() and sanitize_dead_code()
to separate functions which can rewrite instructions from pure checks.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Some JITs (nfp) try to optimize code on their own. It could make
sense in case of BPF_JSET instruction which is currently not interpreted
by the verifier, meaning for instance that dead could would not be
detected if it was under BPF_JSET branch.
Teach the verifier basics of BPF_JSET, JIT optimizations will be
removed shortly.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
This patch rejects a line_info if the bpf insn code referred by
line_info.insn_off is 0. F.e. a broken userspace tool might generate
a line_info.insn_off that points to the second 8 bytes of a BPF_LD_IMM64.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Current btf internal verbose logger logs fwd type as
[2] FWD A type_id=0
where A is the type name.
Commit 9d5f9f701b18 ("bpf: btf: fix struct/union/fwd types
with kind_flag") introduced kind_flag which can be used
to distinguish whether a forward type is a struct or
union.
Also, "type_id=0" does not carry any meaningful
information for fwd type as btf_type.type = 0 is simply
enforced during btf verification and is not used
anywhere else.
This commit changed the log to
[2] FWD A struct
if kind_flag = 0, or
[2] FWD A union
if kind_flag = 1.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Verifier is supposed to support sharing stack slot allocated to ptr with
SCALAR_VALUE for privileged program. However this doesn't happen for some
cases.
The reason is verifier is not clearing slot_type STACK_SPILL for all bytes,
it only clears part of them, while verifier is using:
slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL
as a convention to check one slot is ptr type.
So, the consequence of partial clearing slot_type is verifier could treat a
partially overridden ptr slot, which should now be a SCALAR_VALUE slot,
still as ptr slot, and rejects some valid programs.
Before this patch, test_xdp_noinline.o under bpf selftests, bpf_lxc.o and
bpf_netdev.o under Cilium bpf repo, when built with -mattr=+alu32 are
rejected due to this issue. After this patch, they all accepted.
There is no processed insn number change before and after this patch on
Cilium bpf programs.
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Distributions build drivers as modules, including network and filesystem
drivers which export numerous tracepoints. This enables
bpf(BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN) to attach to those tracepoints.
Signed-off-by: Matt Mullins <mmullins@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Commit 970289fc0a83 ("bpf: add bpffs pretty print for cgroup
local storage maps") added bpffs pretty print for cgroup
local storage maps. The commit worked for struct without kind_flag
set.
This patch refactored and made pretty print also work
with kind_flag set for the struct.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
This patch fixed two issues with BTF. One is related to
struct/union bitfield encoding and the other is related to
forward type.
Issue #1 and solution:
======================
Current btf encoding of bitfield follows what pahole generates.
For each bitfield, pahole will duplicate the type chain and
put the bitfield size at the final int or enum type.
Since the BTF enum type cannot encode bit size,
pahole workarounds the issue by generating
an int type whenever the enum bit size is not 32.
For example,
-bash-4.4$ cat t.c
typedef int ___int;
enum A { A1, A2, A3 };
struct t {
int a[5];
___int b:4;
volatile enum A c:4;
} g;
-bash-4.4$ gcc -c -O2 -g t.c
The current kernel supports the following BTF encoding:
$ pahole -JV t.o
[1] TYPEDEF ___int type_id=2
[2] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[3] ENUM A size=4 vlen=3
A1 val=0
A2 val=1
A3 val=2
[4] STRUCT t size=24 vlen=3
a type_id=5 bits_offset=0
b type_id=9 bits_offset=160
c type_id=11 bits_offset=164
[5] ARRAY (anon) type_id=2 index_type_id=2 nr_elems=5
[6] INT sizetype size=8 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=64 encoding=(none)
[7] VOLATILE (anon) type_id=3
[8] INT int size=1 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=4 encoding=(none)
[9] TYPEDEF ___int type_id=8
[10] INT (anon) size=1 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=4 encoding=SIGNED
[11] VOLATILE (anon) type_id=10
Two issues are in the above:
. by changing enum type to int, we lost the original
type information and this will not be ideal later
when we try to convert BTF to a header file.
. the type duplication for bitfields will cause
BTF bloat. Duplicated types cannot be deduplicated
later if the bitfield size is different.
To fix this issue, this patch implemented a compatible
change for BTF struct type encoding:
. the bit 31 of struct_type->info, previously reserved,
now is used to indicate whether bitfield_size is
encoded in btf_member or not.
. if bit 31 of struct_type->info is set,
btf_member->offset will encode like:
bit 0 - 23: bit offset
bit 24 - 31: bitfield size
if bit 31 is not set, the old behavior is preserved:
bit 0 - 31: bit offset
So if the struct contains a bit field, the maximum bit offset
will be reduced to (2^24 - 1) instead of MAX_UINT. The maximum
bitfield size will be 256 which is enough for today as maximum
bitfield in compiler can be 128 where int128 type is supported.
This kernel patch intends to support the new BTF encoding:
$ pahole -JV t.o
[1] TYPEDEF ___int type_id=2
[2] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[3] ENUM A size=4 vlen=3
A1 val=0
A2 val=1
A3 val=2
[4] STRUCT t kind_flag=1 size=24 vlen=3
a type_id=5 bitfield_size=0 bits_offset=0
b type_id=1 bitfield_size=4 bits_offset=160
c type_id=7 bitfield_size=4 bits_offset=164
[5] ARRAY (anon) type_id=2 index_type_id=2 nr_elems=5
[6] INT sizetype size=8 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=64 encoding=(none)
[7] VOLATILE (anon) type_id=3
Issue #2 and solution:
======================
Current forward type in BTF does not specify whether the original
type is struct or union. This will not work for type pretty print
and BTF-to-header-file conversion as struct/union must be specified.
$ cat tt.c
struct t;
union u;
int foo(struct t *t, union u *u) { return 0; }
$ gcc -c -g -O2 tt.c
$ pahole -JV tt.o
[1] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[2] FWD t type_id=0
[3] PTR (anon) type_id=2
[4] FWD u type_id=0
[5] PTR (anon) type_id=4
To fix this issue, similar to issue #1, type->info bit 31
is used. If the bit is set, it is union type. Otherwise, it is
a struct type.
$ pahole -JV tt.o
[1] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[2] FWD t kind_flag=0 type_id=0
[3] PTR (anon) kind_flag=0 type_id=2
[4] FWD u kind_flag=1 type_id=0
[5] PTR (anon) kind_flag=0 type_id=4
Pahole/LLVM change:
===================
The new kind_flag functionality has been implemented in pahole
and llvm:
https://github.com/yonghong-song/pahole/tree/bitfield
https://github.com/yonghong-song/llvm/tree/bitfield
Note that pahole hasn't implemented func/func_proto kind
and .BTF.ext. So to print function signature with bpftool,
the llvm compiler should be used.
Fixes: 69b693f0aefa ("bpf: btf: Introduce BPF Type Format (BTF)")
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Refactor function btf_int_bits_seq_show() by creating
function btf_bitfield_seq_show() which has no dependence
on btf and btf_type. The function btf_bitfield_seq_show()
will be in later patch to directly dump bitfield member values.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Existing libraries and tracing frameworks work around this kernel
version check by automatically deriving the kernel version from
uname(3) or similar such that the user does not need to do it
manually; these workarounds also make the version check useless
at the same time.
Moreover, most other BPF tracing types enabling bpf_probe_read()-like
functionality have /not/ adapted this check, and in general these
days it is well understood anyway that all the tracing programs are
not stable with regards to future kernels as kernel internal data
structures are subject to change from release to release.
Back at last netconf we discussed [0] and agreed to remove this
check from bpf_prog_load() and instead document it here in the uapi
header that there is no such guarantee for stable API for these
programs.
[0] http://vger.kernel.org/netconf2018_files/DanielBorkmann_netconf2018.pdf
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Introduce REG_LIVE_DONE to check the liveness propagation
and prepare the states for merging.
See algorithm description in clean_live_states().
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
"if (old->allocated_stack > cur->allocated_stack)" check is too conservative.
In some cases explored stack could have allocated more space,
but that stack space was not live.
The test case improves from 19 to 15 processed insns
and improvement on real programs is significant as well:
before after
bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 1940 1831
bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3089 3029
bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1065 1064
bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 28052 26309
bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 35487 33517
bpf_netdev.o 10864 9713
bpf_overlay.o 6643 6184
bpf_lcx_jit.o 38437 37335
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
Don't check the same stack liveness condition 8 times.
once is enough.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
This patch adds bpf_line_info during the verifier's verbose.
It can give error context for debug purpose.
~~~~~~~~~~
Here is the verbose log for backedge:
while (a) {
a += bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
bpf_trace_printk(fmt, sizeof(fmt), a);
}
~> bpftool prog load ./test_loop.o /sys/fs/bpf/test_loop type tracepoint
13: while (a) {
3: a += bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
back-edge from insn 13 to 3
~~~~~~~~~~
Here is the verbose log for invalid pkt access:
Modification to test_xdp_noinline.c:
data = (void *)(long)xdp->data;
data_end = (void *)(long)xdp->data_end;
/*
if (data + 4 > data_end)
return XDP_DROP;
*/
*(u32 *)data = dst->dst;
~> bpftool prog load ./test_xdp_noinline.o /sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_noinline type xdp
; data = (void *)(long)xdp->data;
224: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 -112)
225: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)
; *(u32 *)data = dst->dst;
226: (63) *(u32 *)(r2 +0) = r1
invalid access to packet, off=0 size=4, R2(id=0,off=0,r=0)
R2 offset is outside of the packet
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
The current btf_name_by_offset() is returning "(anon)" type name for
the offset == 0 case and "(invalid-name-offset)" for the out-of-bound
offset case.
It fits well for the internal BTF verbose log purpose which
is focusing on type. For example,
offset == 0 => "(anon)" => anonymous type/name.
Returning non-NULL for the bad offset case is needed
during the BTF verification process because the BTF verifier may
complain about another field first before discovering the name_off
is invalid.
However, it may not be ideal for the newer use case which does not
necessary mean type name. For example, when logging line_info
in the BPF verifier in the next patch, it is better to log an
empty src line instead of logging "(anon)".
The existing bpf_name_by_offset() is renamed to __bpf_name_by_offset()
and static to btf.c.
A new bpf_name_by_offset() is added for generic context usage. It
returns "\0" for name_off == 0 (note that btf->strings[0] is "\0")
and NULL for invalid offset. It allows the caller to decide
what is the best output in its context.
The new btf_name_by_offset() is overlapped with btf_name_offset_valid().
Hence, btf_name_offset_valid() is removed from btf.h to keep the btf.h API
minimal. The existing btf_name_offset_valid() usage in btf.c could also be
replaced later.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
This logic is not needed anymore since we got rid of the verifier
rewrite that was using prog->aux address in f6069b9aa993 ("bpf:
fix redirect to map under tail calls").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently for liveness and state pruning the register parentage
chains don't include states of the callee. This makes some sense
as the callee can't access those registers. However, this means
that READs done after the callee returns will not propagate into
the states of the callee. Callee will then perform pruning
disregarding differences in caller state.
Example:
0: (85) call bpf_user_rnd_u32
1: (b7) r8 = 0
2: (55) if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+1
3: (b7) r8 = 1
4: (bf) r1 = r8
5: (85) call pc+4
6: (15) if r8 == 0x1 goto pc+1
7: (05) *(u64 *)(r9 - 8) = r3
8: (b7) r0 = 0
9: (95) exit
10: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+0
11: (95) exit
Here we acquire unknown state with call to get_random() [1]. Then
we store this random state in r8 (either 0 or 1) [1 - 3], and make
a call on line 5. Callee does nothing but a trivial conditional
jump (to create a pruning point). Upon return caller checks the
state of r8 and either performs an unsafe read or not.
Verifier will first explore the path with r8 == 1, creating a pruning
point at [11]. The parentage chain for r8 will include only callers
states so once verifier reaches [6] it will mark liveness only on states
in the caller, and not [11]. Now when verifier walks the paths with
r8 == 0 it will reach [11] and since REG_LIVE_READ on r8 was not
propagated there it will prune the walk entirely (stop walking
the entire program, not just the callee). Since [6] was never walked
with r8 == 0, [7] will be considered dead and replaced with "goto -1"
causing hang at runtime.
This patch weaves the callee's explored states onto the callers
parentage chain. Rough parentage for r8 would have looked like this
before:
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [10] [11] [6] [7]
| | ,---|----. | | |
sl0: sl0: / sl0: \ sl0: sl0: sl0:
fr0: r8 <-- fr0: r8<+--fr0: r8 `fr0: r8 ,fr0: r8<-fr0: r8
\ fr1: r8 <- fr1: r8 /
\__________________/
after:
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [10] [11] [6] [7]
| | | | | |
sl0: sl0: sl0: sl0: sl0: sl0:
fr0: r8 <-- fr0: r8 <- fr0: r8 <- fr0: r8 <-fr0: r8<-fr0: r8
fr1: r8 <- fr1: r8
Now the mark from instruction 6 will travel through callees states.
Note that we don't have to connect r0 because its overwritten by
callees state on return and r1 - r5 because those are not alive
any more once a call is made.
v2:
- don't connect the callees registers twice (Alexei: suggestion & code)
- add more details to the comment (Ed & Alexei)
v1: don't unnecessarily link caller saved regs (Jiong)
Fixes: f4d7e40a5b71 ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
Reported-by: David Beckett <david.beckett@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Changes v2 -> v3:
1. remove check for bpf_dump_raw_ok().
Changes v1 -> v2:
1. Fix error path as Martin suggested.
This patch adds nr_prog_tags and prog_tags to bpf_prog_info. This is a
reliable way for user space to get tags of all sub programs. Before this
patch, user space need to find sub program tags via kallsyms.
This feature will be used in BPF introspection, where user space queries
information about BPF programs via sys_bpf.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
The func_info and line_info have the bpf insn offset but
they do not contain kernel address. They will still be useful
for the userspace tool to annotate the xlated insn.
This patch removes the bpf_dump_raw_ok() guard for the
func_info and line_info during bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd().
The guard stays for jited_line_info which contains the kernel
address.
Although this bpf_dump_raw_ok() guard behavior has started since
the earlier func_info patch series, I marked the Fixes tag to the
latest line_info patch series which contains both func_info and
line_info and this patch is fixing for both of them.
Fixes: c454a46b5efd ("bpf: Add bpf_line_info support")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
Jiong Wang
Jakub Kicinski
Song Liu
Daniel Borkmann
Mathieu Malaterre
Stanislav Fomichev
Peter Oskolkov
Yonghong Song
Linus Torvalds
David S. Miller
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Martin KaFai Lau
Matt Mullins
Alexei Starovoitov