| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
doc.2015.02.26a: Documentation changes
earlycb.2015.03.03a: Permit early-boot RCU callbacks
fixes.2015.03.03a: Miscellaneous fixes
gpexp.2015.02.26a: In-kernel expediting of normal grace periods
hotplug.2015.03.20a: CPU hotplug fixes
sysidle.2015.02.26b: NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE fixes
tiny.2015.02.26a: TINY_RCU fixes
|
|
As noted in earlier commit logs, CPU hotplug operations running
concurrently with grace-period initialization can result in a given
leaf rcu_node structure having all CPUs offline and no blocked readers,
but with this rcu_node structure nevertheless blocking the current
grace period. Therefore, the quiescent-state forcing code now checks
for this situation and repairs it.
Unfortunately, this checking can result in false positives, for example,
when the last task has just removed itself from this leaf rcu_node
structure, but has not yet started clearing the ->qsmask bits further
up the structure. This means that the grace-period kthread (which
forces quiescent states) and some other task might be attempting to
concurrently clear these ->qsmask bits. This is usually not a problem:
One of these tasks will be the first to acquire the upper-level rcu_node
structure's lock and with therefore clear the bit, and the other task,
seeing the bit already cleared, will stop trying to clear bits.
Sadly, this means that the following unusual sequence of events -can-
result in a problem:
1. The grace-period kthread wins, and clears the ->qsmask bits.
2. This is the last thing blocking the current grace period, so
that the grace-period kthread clears ->qsmask bits all the way
to the root and finds that the root ->qsmask field is now zero.
3. Another grace period is required, so that the grace period kthread
initializes it, including setting all the needed qsmask bits.
4. The leaf rcu_node structure (the one that started this whole
mess) is blocking this new grace period, either because it
has at least one online CPU or because there is at least one
task that had blocked within an RCU read-side critical section
while running on one of this leaf rcu_node structure's CPUs.
(And yes, that CPU might well have gone offline before the
grace period in step (3) above started, which can mean that
there is a task on the leaf rcu_node structure's ->blkd_tasks
list, but ->qsmask equal to zero.)
5. The other kthread didn't get around to trying to clear the upper
level ->qsmask bits until all the above had happened. This means
that it now sees bits set in the upper-level ->qsmask field, so it
proceeds to clear them. Too bad that it is doing so on behalf of
a quiescent state that does not apply to the current grace period!
This sequence of events can result in the new grace period being too
short. It can also result in the new grace period ending before the
leaf rcu_node structure's ->qsmask bits have been cleared, which will
result in splats during initialization of the next grace period. In
addition, it can result in tasks blocking the new grace period still
being queued at the start of the next grace period, which will result
in other splats. Sasha's testing turned up another of these splats,
as did rcutorture testing. (And yes, rcutorture is being adjusted to
make these splats show up more quickly. Which probably is having the
undesirable side effect of making other problems show up less quickly.
Can't have everything!)
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0.x
Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
|
|
As noted earlier, the following sequence of events can occur when
running PREEMPT_RCU and HOTPLUG_CPU on a system with a multi-level
rcu_node combining tree:
1. A group of tasks block on CPUs corresponding to a given leaf
rcu_node structure while within RCU read-side critical sections.
2. All CPUs corrsponding to that rcu_node structure go offline.
3. The next grace period starts, but because there are still tasks
blocked, the upper-level bits corresponding to this leaf rcu_node
structure remain set.
4. All the tasks exit their RCU read-side critical sections and
remove themselves from the leaf rcu_node structure's list,
leaving it empty.
5. But because there now is code to check for this condition at
force-quiescent-state time, the upper bits are cleared and the
grace period completes.
However, there is another complication that can occur following step 4 above:
4a. The grace period starts, and the leaf rcu_node structure's
gp_tasks pointer is set to NULL because there are no tasks
blocked on this structure.
4b. One of the CPUs corresponding to the leaf rcu_node structure
comes back online.
4b. An endless stream of tasks are preempted within RCU read-side
critical sections on this CPU, such that the ->blkd_tasks
list is always non-empty.
The grace period will never end.
This commit therefore makes the force-quiescent-state processing check only
for absence of tasks blocking the current grace period rather than absence
of tasks altogether. This will cause a quiescent state to be reported if
the current leaf rcu_node structure is not blocking the current grace period
and its parent thinks that it is, regardless of how RCU managed to get
itself into this state.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0.x
Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
|
|
At grace-period initialization time, RCU checks that all quiescent
states were really reported for the previous grace period. Now that
grace-period cleanup has been split out of grace-period initialization,
this commit also performs those checks at grace-period cleanup time.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This commit informs RCU of an outgoing CPU just before that CPU invokes
arch_cpu_idle_dead() during its last pass through the idle loop (via a
new CPU_DYING_IDLE notifier value). This change means that RCU need not
deal with outgoing CPUs passing through the scheduler after informing
RCU that they are no longer online. Note that removing the CPU from
the rcu_node ->qsmaskinit bit masks is done at CPU_DYING_IDLE time,
and orphaning callbacks is still done at CPU_DEAD time, the reason being
that at CPU_DEAD time we have another CPU that can adopt them.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Because that RCU grace-period initialization need no longer exclude
CPU-hotplug operations, this commit eliminates the ->onoff_mutex and
its uses.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Races between CPU hotplug and grace periods can be difficult to resolve,
so the ->onoff_mutex is used to exclude the two events. Unfortunately,
this means that it is impossible for an outgoing CPU to perform the
last bits of its offlining from its last pass through the idle loop,
because sleeplocks cannot be acquired in that context.
This commit avoids these problems by buffering online and offline events
in a new ->qsmaskinitnext field in the leaf rcu_node structures. When a
grace period starts, the events accumulated in this mask are applied to
the ->qsmaskinit field, and, if needed, up the rcu_node tree. The special
case of all CPUs corresponding to a given leaf rcu_node structure being
offline while there are still elements in that structure's ->blkd_tasks
list is handled using a new ->wait_blkd_tasks field. In this case,
propagating the offline bits up the tree is deferred until the beginning
of the grace period after all of the tasks have exited their RCU read-side
critical sections and removed themselves from the list, at which point
the ->wait_blkd_tasks flag is cleared. If one of that leaf rcu_node
structure's CPUs comes back online before the list empties, then the
->wait_blkd_tasks flag is simply cleared.
This of course means that RCU's notion of which CPUs are offline can be
out of date. This is OK because RCU need only wait on CPUs that were
online at the time that the grace period started. In addition, RCU's
force-quiescent-state actions will handle the case where a CPU goes
offline after the grace period starts.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() function is invoked when the
last task blocking the current grace period exits its outermost
RCU read-side critical section. Previously, this was called only
from rcu_read_unlock_special(), and was therefore defined only when
CONFIG_RCU_PREEMPT=y. However, this function will be invoked even when
CONFIG_RCU_PREEMPT=n once CPU-hotplug operations are processed only at
the beginnings of RCU grace periods. The reason for this change is that
the last task on a given leaf rcu_node structure's ->blkd_tasks list
might well exit its RCU read-side critical section between the time that
recent CPU-hotplug operations were applied and when the new grace period
was initialized. This situation could result in RCU waiting forever on
that leaf rcu_node structure, because if all that structure's CPUs were
already offline, there would be no quiescent-state events to drive that
structure's part of the grace period.
This commit therefore moves rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() to common code
that is built unconditionally so that the quiescent-state-forcing code
can clean up after this situation, avoiding the grace-period stall.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently, the rcu_node tree ->expmask bitmasks are initially set to
reflect the online CPUs. This is pointless, because only the CPUs
preempted within RCU read-side critical sections by the preceding
synchronize_sched_expedited() need to be tracked. This commit therefore
instead sets up these bitmasks based on the state of the ->blkd_tasks
lists.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Offline CPUs cannot safely invoke trace events, but such CPUs do execute
within rcu_cpu_notify(). Therefore, this commit removes the trace events
from rcu_cpu_notify(). These trace events are for utilization, against
which rcu_cpu_notify() execution time should be negligible.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Grace-period initialization normally proceeds quite quickly, so
that it is very difficult to reproduce races against grace-period
initialization. This commit therefore allows grace-period
initialization to be artificially slowed down, increasing
race-reproduction probability. A pair of new Kconfig parameters are
provided, CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT to enable the slowdowns, and
CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT_DELAY to specify the number of jiffies
of slowdown to apply. A boot-time parameter named rcutree.gp_init_delay
allows boot-time delay to be specified. By default, no delay will be
applied even if CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT is set.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
If all CPUs have passed through quiescent states, then stalls might be
due to starvation of the grace-period kthread or to failure to propagate
the quiescent states up the rcu_node combining tree. The current stall
warning messages do not differentiate, so this commit adds a printout
of the root rcu_node structure's ->qsmask field.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This commit eliminates a boolean and associated "if" statement by
rearranging the code.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently, both rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu() and rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage()
initialize the outgoing CPU's callback list. However, only
rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu() invokes rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage(), and
it does so unconditionally, which means that only one of these
initializations is required. This commit therefore consolidates the
callback-list initialization with the rest of the callback handling in
rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Because invoke_cpu_core() checks whether the current CPU is online,
there is no need for __call_rcu_core() to redundantly check it.
There should not be any performance degradation because the called
function is visible to the compiler. This commit therefore removes
the redundant check.
Signed-off-by: Yao Dongdong <yaodongdong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The very similar functions rcu_force_quiescent_state(),
rcu_bh_force_quiescent_state(), and rcu_sched_force_quiescent_state()
are supposed to be together, but have drifted apart. This commit
restores rcu_sched_force_quiescent_state() to its rightful place.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This commit gets rid of some inline #ifdefs by replacing them with
IS_ENABLED.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
If an RCU read-side critical section occurs within an interrupt handler
or a softirq handler, it cannot have been preempted. Therefore, there is
a check in rcu_read_unlock_special() checking for this error. However,
when this check triggers, it lacks diagnostic information. This commit
therefore moves rcu_read_unlock()'s lockdep annotation to follow the
call to __rcu_read_unlock() and changes rcu_read_unlock_special()'s
WARN_ON_ONCE() to an lockdep_rcu_suspicious() in order to locate where
the offending RCU read-side critical section began. In addition, the
value of the ->rcu_read_unlock_special field is printed.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This commit uses IS_ENABLED() to remove the #ifdef from the
rcu_init_levelspread() functions. No effect on executable code.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Because callbacks can now be posted quite early in boot, move the
early boot callback tests to precede RCU initialization.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
When a CPU is first determined to be a no-CBs CPUs, this commit causes
any early boot callbacks to be moved to the no-CBs callback list,
allowing them to be invoked.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
If the RCU grace-period kthread invoking rcu_sysidle_check_cpu()
happens to be running on the tick_do_timer_cpu initially,
then rcu_bind_gp_kthread() won't bind it. This kthread might
then migrate before invoking rcu_gp_fqs(), which will trigger the
WARN_ON_ONCE() in rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(). This commit therefore makes
rcu_bind_gp_kthread() do the binding even if the kthread is currently
on the same CPU. Because this incurs added overhead, this commit also
causes each RCU grace-period kthread to invoke rcu_bind_gp_kthread()
once at boot rather than at the beginning of each grace period.
And as long as rcu_bind_gp_kthread() is being modified, this commit
eliminates its #ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The standard code path accommodates a condition when no
RCU callbacks are ready to invoke. Since size of the code
is a priority for tiny RCU, remove the fast path.
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
When the ->curtail and ->donetail pointers differ, ->rcucblist
always points to the beginning of the current list and thus
cannot be NULL. Therefore, the check ->rcucblist != NULL is
redundant and this commit removes it.
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
On second and subsequent passes through quiescent-state forcing, the
isidle variable was initialized to false, which would prevent full sysidle
state from being reached if a grace period needed more than one round
of quiescent-state forcing (which most should not). However, the check
for offline CPUs in the quiescent-state forcing main loop had the wrong
sense, which could prevent CPUs from ever entering full sysidle state.
This commit fixes both of these bugs. Given that sysidle is not yet
wired up, this has no effect in old kernels, but might have proven
frustrating had anyone attempted to wire it up.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The "if" statement at the beginning of rcu_torture_writer() should
use the same set of variables. In theory, this does not matter because
the corresponding variables (gp_sync and gp_sync1) have the same value
at this point in the code, but in practice such puzzles should be
removed. This commit therefore makes the use of variables consistent.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This commit adds a CONFIG_RCU_EXPEDITE_BOOT Kconfig parameter
that emulates a very early boot rcu_expedite_gp(). A late-boot
call to rcu_end_inkernel_boot() will provide the corresponding
rcu_unexpedite_gp(). The late-boot call to rcu_end_inkernel_boot()
should be made just before init is spawned.
According to Arjan:
> To show the boot time, I'm using the timestamp of the "Write protecting"
> line, that's pretty much the last thing we print prior to ring 3 execution.
>
> A kernel with default RCU behavior (inside KVM, only virtual devices)
> looks like this:
>
> [ 0.038724] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 10240k
>
> a kernel with expedited RCU (using the command line option, so that I
> don't have to recompile between measurements and thus am completely
> oranges-to-oranges)
>
> [ 0.031768] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 10240k
>
> which, in percentage, is an 18% improvement.
Reported-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
|
|
This commit updates open-coded tests of the rcu_expedited variable
to instead use rcu_gp_is_expedited().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently, expediting of normal synchronous grace-period primitives
(synchronize_rcu() and friends) is controlled by the rcu_expedited()
boot/sysfs parameter. This works well, but does not handle nesting.
This commit therefore provides rcu_expedite_gp() to enable expediting
and rcu_unexpedite_gp() to cancel a prior rcu_expedite_gp(), both of
which support nesting.
Reported-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
When a CPU comes online, it initializes its callback list. This
is a bad thing if this is the first time that the CPU has come
online and if that CPU has early boot callbacks. This commit therefore
avoid initializing the callback list if there are callbacks present,
in which case the initial call_rcu() did the initialization for us.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Some diagnostics under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU in rcu_nocb_cpu_needs_barrier()
assume that there can be no early-boot callbacks. This commit therefore
qualifies the diagnostic with rcu_scheduler_fully_active to permit
early boot callbacks to avoid this splat.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently, a call_rcu() that precedes rcu_init() will splat due to the
callback lists not having yet been initialized. This commit causes the
first such callback to initialize the boot CPU's RCU callback list.
Note that this commit does not change rcu_init()-time initialization,
which means that the callback will be discarded at rcu_init() time.
Fixing this is the job of later commits.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This commit wires up the rcu_state structures' ->rda pointers to the
per-CPU rcu_data structures at compile time, thus ensuring that this
linkage is present at early boot, in turn allowing posting of callbacks
before rcu_init() is executed.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
In preparation for early-boot posting of callbacks, this commit abstracts
initialization of the default (non-no-CB) callbacks list from the
init_callback_list() function into a new init_default_callback_list()
function.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
In rcu_gp_init(), rnp->completed equals to rsp->completed in THEORY,
we don't need to touch it normally. If something goes wrong,
it will complain and fixup rnp->completed and avoid oops.
This commit thus avoids the normal needless store to rnp->completed.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
There are currently duplicate identical definitions of the
rcu_synchronize() structure and the wakeme_after_rcu() function.
Thie commit therefore consolidates them.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Pull rcu fix and x86 irq fix from Ingo Molnar:
- Fix a bug that caused an RCU warning splat.
- Two x86 irq related fixes: a hotplug crash fix and an ACPI IRQ
registry fix.
* 'core-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
rcu: Clear need_qs flag to prevent splat
* 'irq-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/irq: Check for valid irq descriptor in check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable()
x86/irq: Fix regression caused by commit b568b8601f05
|
|
printk and friends can now format bitmaps using '%*pb[l]'. cpumask
and nodemask also provide cpumask_pr_args() and nodemask_pr_args()
respectively which can be used to generate the two printf arguments
necessary to format the specified cpu/nodemask.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
If the scheduling-clock interrupt sets the current tasks need_qs flag,
but if the current CPU passes through a quiescent state in the meantime,
then rcu_preempt_qs() will fail to clear the need_qs flag, which can fool
RCU into thinking that additional rcu_read_unlock_special() processing
is needed. This commit therefore clears the need_qs flag before checking
for additional processing.
For this problem to occur, we need rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce equal
to true and current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs also equal to true.
This condition can occur as follows:
1. CPU 0 is aware of the current preemptible RCU grace period,
but has not yet passed through a quiescent state. Among other
things, this means that rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce is false.
2. Task A running on CPU 0 enters a preemptible RCU read-side
critical section.
3. CPU 0 takes a scheduling-clock interrupt, which notices the
RCU read-side critical section and the need for a quiescent state,
and thus sets current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs to true.
4. Task A is preempted, enters the scheduler, eventually invoking
rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() which in turn invokes
rcu_preempt_qs().
Because rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce is false,
control enters the body of the "if" statement, which sets
rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce to true.
5. At this point, CPU 0 takes an interrupt. The interrupt
handler contains an RCU read-side critical section, and
the rcu_read_unlock() notes that current->rcu_read_unlock_special
is nonzero, and thus invokes rcu_read_unlock_special().
6. Once in rcu_read_unlock_special(), the fact that
current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs is true becomes
apparent, so rcu_read_unlock_special() invokes rcu_preempt_qs().
Recursively, given that we interrupted out of that same
function in the preceding step.
7. Because rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce is now true,
rcu_preempt_qs() does nothing, and simply returns.
8. Upon return to rcu_read_unlock_special(), it is noted that
current->rcu_read_unlock_special is still nonzero (because
the interrupted rcu_preempt_qs() had not yet gotten around
to clearing current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs).
9. Execution proceeds to the WARN_ON_ONCE(), which notes that
we are in an interrupt handler and thus duly splats.
The solution, as noted above, is to make rcu_read_unlock_special()
clear out current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs after calling
rcu_preempt_qs(). The interrupted rcu_preempt_qs() will clear it again,
but this is harmless. The worst that happens is that we clobber another
attempt to set this field, but this is not a problem because we just
got done reporting a quiescent state.
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Fix embarrassing build bug noted by Sasha Levin. ]
Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
|
|
doc.2015.01.07a: Documentation updates.
fixes.2015.01.15a: Miscellaneous fixes.
preempt.2015.01.06a: Changes to handling of lists of preempted tasks.
srcu.2015.01.06a: SRCU updates.
stall.2015.01.16a: RCU CPU stall-warning updates and fixes.
torture.2015.01.11a: RCU torture-test updates and fixes.
|
|
The current tiny RCU stall-warning code assumes that the jiffies counter
starts at zero, however, it is sometimes initialized to other values,
for example, -30,000. This commit therefore changes rcu_init() to
invoke reset_cpu_stall_ticks() for both flavors of RCU to initialize
the stall-warning times properly at boot.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The tiny RCU CPU stall detection depends on *rcp->curtail not being
NULL. It is however a tail pointer and thus NULL by definition. Instead we
should check rcp->rcucblist for the presence of pending callbacks which
need to be processed. With this fix INFO about the stall is printed and
jiffies_stall (jiffies at next stall) correctly updated.
Note that the check for pending callback is necessary to avoid spurious
warnings if there are no pendings callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
[ paulmck: Fused identical "if" statements, ported to -rcu. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This commit adds a message that is printed if the relevant grace-period
kthread has not been able to run for the two seconds preceding the
stall warning. (The two seconds is double the maximum interval between
successive bouts of quiescent-state forcing.)
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Although cond_resched_rcu_qs() only applies to TASKS_RCU, it is used
in places where it would be useful for it to apply to the normal RCU
flavors, rcu_preempt, rcu_sched, and rcu_bh. This is especially the
case for workloads that aggressively overload the system, particularly
those that generate large numbers of RCU updates on systems running
NO_HZ_FULL CPUs. This commit therefore communicates quiescent states
from cond_resched_rcu_qs() to the normal RCU flavors.
Note that it is unfortunately necessary to leave the old ->passed_quiesce
mechanism in place to allow quiescent states that apply to only one
flavor to be recorded. (Yes, we could decrement ->rcu_qs_ctr_snap in
that case, but that is not so good for debugging of RCU internals.)
In addition, if one of the RCU flavor's grace period has stalled, this
will invoke rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(), resulting in a heavy-weight
quiescent state visible from other CPUs.
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Merge commit from Sasha Levin fixing a bug where __this_cpu()
was used in preemptible code. ]
|
|
Recent testing has shown that under heavy load, running RCU's grace-period
kthreads at real-time priority can improve performance (according to 0day
test robot) and reduce the incidence of RCU CPU stall warnings. However,
most systems do just fine with the default non-realtime priorities for
these kthreads, and it does not make sense to expose the entire user
base to any risk stemming from this change, given that this change is
of use only to a few users running extremely heavy workloads.
Therefore, this commit allows users to specify realtime priorities
for the grace-period kthreads, but leaves them running SCHED_OTHER
by default. The realtime priority may be specified at build time
via the RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO Kconfig parameter, or at boot time via the
rcutree.kthread_prio parameter. Either way, 0 says to continue the
default SCHED_OTHER behavior and values from 1-99 specify that priority
of SCHED_FIFO behavior. Note that a value of 0 is not permitted when
the RCU_BOOST Kconfig parameter is specified.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
Paul E. McKenney
Yao Dongdong
Alexander Gordeev
Lai Jiangshan
Linus Torvalds
Tejun Heo
Miroslav Benes