aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/core/stream.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2006-07-12[NET]: fix __sk_stream_mem_reclaimIan McDonald1-9/+7
__sk_stream_mem_reclaim is only called by sk_stream_mem_reclaim. As such the check on sk->sk_forward_alloc is not needed and can be removed. Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-04-20[NET]: Add skb->truesize assertion checking.David S. Miller1-0/+1
Add some sanity checking. truesize should be at least sizeof(struct sk_buff) plus the current packet length. If not, then truesize is seriously mangled and deserves a kernel log message. Currently we'll do the check for release of stream socket buffers. But we can add checks to more spots over time. Incorporating ideas from Herbert Xu. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2006-01-03[NET]: Avoid atomic xchg() for non-error caseBenjamin LaHaise1-3/+7
It also looks like there were 2 places where the test on sk_err was missing from the event wait logic (in sk_stream_wait_connect and sk_stream_wait_memory), while the rest of the sock_error() users look to be doing the right thing. This version of the patch fixes those, and cleans up a few places that were testing ->sk_err directly. Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <benjamin.c.lahaise@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-05[NET]: Fix race condition in sk_stream_wait_connectHerbert Xu1-6/+6
When sk_stream_wait_connect detects a state transition to ESTABLISHED or CLOSE_WAIT prior to it going to sleep, it will return without calling finish_wait and decrementing sk_write_pending. This may result in crashes and other unintended behaviour. The fix is to always call finish_wait and update sk_write_pending since it is safe to do so even if the wait entry is no longer on the queue. This bug was tracked down with the help of Alex Sidorenko and the fix is also based on his suggestion. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
2005-05-01[PATCH] DocBook: changes and extensions to the kernel documentationPavel Pisa1-6/+6
I have recompiled Linux kernel 2.6.11.5 documentation for me and our university students again. The documentation could be extended for more sources which are equipped by structured comments for recent 2.6 kernels. I have tried to proceed with that task. I have done that more times from 2.6.0 time and it gets boring to do same changes again and again. Linux kernel compiles after changes for i386 and ARM targets. I have added references to some more files into kernel-api book, I have added some section names as well. So please, check that changes do not break something and that categories are not too much skewed. I have changed kernel-doc to accept "fastcall" and "asmlinkage" words reserved by kernel convention. Most of the other changes are modifications in the comments to make kernel-doc happy, accept some parameters description and do not bail out on errors. Changed <pid> to @pid in the description, moved some #ifdef before comments to correct function to comments bindings, etc. You can see result of the modified documentation build at http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~pisa/linux/lkdb-2.6.11.tar.gz Some more sources are ready to be included into kernel-doc generated documentation. Sources has been added into kernel-api for now. Some more section names added and probably some more chaos introduced as result of quick cleanup work. Signed-off-by: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds1-0/+287
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!