aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/rxrpc/input.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-05-10rxrpc: Fix missing start of call timeoutDavid Howells1-1/+1
The expect_rx_by call timeout is supposed to be set when a call is started to indicate that we need to receive a packet by that point. This is currently put back every time we receive a packet, but it isn't started when we first send a packet. Without this, the call may wait forever if the server doesn't deign to reply. Fix this by setting the timeout upon a successful UDP sendmsg call for the first DATA packet. The timeout is initiated only for initial transmission and not for subsequent retries as we don't want the retry mechanism to extend the timeout indefinitely. Fixes: a158bdd3247b ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2018-04-04rxrpc: Fix undefined packet handlingDavid Howells1-0/+6
By analogy with other Rx implementations, RxRPC packet types 9, 10 and 11 should just be discarded rather than being aborted like other undefined packet types. Reported-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-03-30rxrpc: Don't treat call aborts as conn abortsDavid Howells1-6/+9
If a call-level abort is received for the previous call to complete on a connection channel, then that abort is queued for the connection processor to handle. Unfortunately, the connection processor then assumes without checking that the abort is connection-level (ie. callNumber is 0) and distributes it over all active calls on that connection, thereby incorrectly aborting them. Fix this by discarding aborts aimed at a completed call. Further, discard all packets aimed at a call that's complete if there's currently an active call on a channel, since the DATA packets associated with the new call automatically terminate the old call. Fixes: 18bfeba50dfd ("rxrpc: Perform terminal call ACK/ABORT retransmission from conn processor") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2018-03-30rxrpc: Fix firewall route keepaliveDavid Howells1-0/+2
Fix the firewall route keepalive part of AF_RXRPC which is currently function incorrectly by replying to VERSION REPLY packets from the server with VERSION REQUEST packets. Instead, send VERSION REPLY packets to the peers of service connections to act as keep-alives 20s after the latest packet was transmitted to that peer. Also, just discard VERSION REPLY packets rather than replying to them. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2018-03-27rxrpc, afs: Use debug_ids rather than pointers in tracesDavid Howells1-3/+3
In rxrpc and afs, use the debug_ids that are monotonically allocated to various objects as they're allocated rather than pointers as kernel pointers are now hashed making them less useful. Further, the debug ids aren't reused anywhere nearly as quickly. In addition, allow kernel services that use rxrpc, such as afs, to take numbers from the rxrpc counter, assign them to their own call struct and pass them in to rxrpc for both client and service calls so that the trace lines for each will have the same ID tag. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-11-29rxrpc: Clean up whitespaceDavid Howells1-2/+2
Clean up some whitespace from rxrpc. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-11-24rxrpc: Add a timeout for detecting lost ACKs/lost DATADavid Howells1-0/+40
Add an extra timeout that is set/updated when we send a DATA packet that has the request-ack flag set. This allows us to detect if we don't get an ACK in response to the latest flagged packet. The ACK packet is adjudged to have been lost if it doesn't turn up within 2*RTT of the transmission. If the timeout occurs, we schedule the sending of a PING ACK to find out the state of the other side. If a new DATA packet is ready to go sooner, we cancel the sending of the ping and set the request-ack flag on that instead. If we get back a PING-RESPONSE ACK that indicates a lower tx_top than what we had at the time of the ping transmission, we adjudge all the DATA packets sent between the response tx_top and the ping-time tx_top to have been lost and retransmit immediately. Rather than sending a PING ACK, we could just pick a DATA packet and speculatively retransmit that with request-ack set. It should result in either a REQUESTED ACK or a DUPLICATE ACK which we can then use in lieu the a PING-RESPONSE ACK mentioned above. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-11-24rxrpc: Fix call timeoutsDavid Howells1-4/+30
Fix the rxrpc call expiration timeouts and make them settable from userspace. By analogy with other rx implementations, there should be three timeouts: (1) "Normal timeout" This is set for all calls and is triggered if we haven't received any packets from the peer in a while. It is measured from the last time we received any packet on that call. This is not reset by any connection packets (such as CHALLENGE/RESPONSE packets). If a service operation takes a long time, the server should generate PING ACKs at a duration that's substantially less than the normal timeout so is to keep both sides alive. This is set at 1/6 of normal timeout. (2) "Idle timeout" This is set only for a service call and is triggered if we stop receiving the DATA packets that comprise the request data. It is measured from the last time we received a DATA packet. (3) "Hard timeout" This can be set for a call and specified the maximum lifetime of that call. It should not be specified by default. Some operations (such as volume transfer) take a long time. Allow userspace to set/change the timeouts on a call with sendmsg, using a control message: RXRPC_SET_CALL_TIMEOUTS The data to the message is a number of 32-bit words, not all of which need be given: u32 hard_timeout; /* sec from first packet */ u32 idle_timeout; /* msec from packet Rx */ u32 normal_timeout; /* msec from data Rx */ This can be set in combination with any other sendmsg() that affects a call. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-11-02rxrpc: Fix call expiry handlingDavid Howells1-2/+0
Fix call expiry handling in the following ways (1) If all the request data from a client call is acked, don't send a follow up IDLE ACK with firstPacket == 1 and previousPacket == 0 as this appears to fool some servers into thinking everything has been accepted. (2) Never send an abort back to the server once it has ACK'd all the request packets; rather just try to reuse the channel for the next call. The first request DATA packet of the next call on the same channel will implicitly ACK the entire reply of the dead call - even if we haven't transmitted it yet. (3) Don't send RX_CALL_TIMEOUT in an ABORT packet, librx uses abort codes to pass local errors to the caller in addition to remote errors, and this is meant to be local only. The following also need to be addressed in future patches: (4) Service calls should send PING ACKs as 'keep alives' if the server is still processing the call. (5) VERSION REPLY packets should be sent to the peers of service connections to act as keep-alives. This is used to keep firewall routes in place. The AFS CM should enable this. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-10-24net: rxrpc: mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+1
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-06-05rxrpc: Add service upgrade support for client connectionsDavid Howells1-0/+17
Make it possible for a client to use AuriStor's service upgrade facility. The client does this by adding an RXRPC_UPGRADE_SERVICE control message to the first sendmsg() of a call. This takes no parameters. When recvmsg() starts returning data from the call, the service ID field in the returned msg_name will reflect the result of the upgrade attempt. If the upgrade was ignored, srx_service will match what was set in the sendmsg(); if the upgrade happened the srx_service will be altered to indicate the service the server upgraded to. Note that: (1) The choice of upgrade service is up to the server (2) Further client calls to the same server that would share a connection are blocked if an upgrade probe is in progress. (3) This should only be used to probe the service. Clients should then use the returned service ID in all subsequent communications with that server (and not set the upgrade). Note that the kernel will not retain this information should the connection expire from its cache. (4) If a server that supports upgrading is replaced by one that doesn't, whilst a connection is live, and if the replacement is running, say, OpenAFS 1.6.4 or older or an older IBM AFS, then the replacement server will not respond to packets sent to the upgraded connection. At this point, calls will time out and the server must be reprobed. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-04-06rxrpc: Trace changes in a call's receive window sizeDavid Howells1-0/+2
Add a tracepoint (rxrpc_rx_rwind_change) to log changes in a call's receive window size as imposed by the peer through an ACK packet. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-04-06rxrpc: Trace received abortsDavid Howells1-1/+3
Add a tracepoint (rxrpc_rx_abort) to record received aborts. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-04-06rxrpc: Trace protocol errors in received packetsDavid Howells1-1/+4
Add a tracepoint (rxrpc_rx_proto) to record protocol errors in received packets. The following changes are made: (1) Add a function, __rxrpc_abort_eproto(), to note a protocol error on a call and mark the call aborted. This is wrapped by rxrpc_abort_eproto() that makes the why string usable in trace. (2) Add trace_rxrpc_rx_proto() or rxrpc_abort_eproto() to protocol error generation points, replacing rxrpc_abort_call() with the latter. (3) Only send an abort packet in rxkad_verify_packet*() if we actually managed to abort the call. Note that a trace event is also emitted if a kernel user (e.g. afs) tries to send data through a call when it's not in the transmission phase, though it's not technically a receive event. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-04-06rxrpc: Use negative error codes in rxrpc_call structDavid Howells1-3/+3
Use negative error codes in struct rxrpc_call::error because that's what the kernel normally deals with and to make the code consistent. We only turn them positive when transcribing into a cmsg for userspace recvmsg. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-03-10rxrpc: Wake up the transmitter if Rx window size increases on the peerDavid Howells1-3/+12
The RxRPC ACK packet may contain an extension that includes the peer's current Rx window size for this call. We adjust the local Tx window size to match. However, the transmitter can stall if the receive window is reduced to 0 by the peer and then reopened. This is because the normal way that the transmitter is re-energised is by dropping something out of our Tx queue and thus making space. When a single gap is made, the transmitter is woken up. However, because there's nothing in the Tx queue at this point, this doesn't happen. To fix this, perform a wake_up() any time we see the peer's Rx window size increasing. The observable symptom is that calls start failing on ETIMEDOUT and the following: kAFS: SERVER DEAD state=-62 appears in dmesg. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-07rxrpc: Call state should be read with READ_ONCE() under some circumstancesDavid Howells1-5/+7
The call state may be changed at any time by the data-ready routine in response to received packets, so if the call state is to be read and acted upon several times in a function, READ_ONCE() must be used unless the call state lock is held. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-01rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsgDavid Howells1-0/+1
All the routines by which rxrpc is accessed from the outside are serialised by means of the socket lock (sendmsg, recvmsg, bind, rxrpc_kernel_begin_call(), ...) and this presents a problem: (1) If a number of calls on the same socket are in the process of connection to the same peer, a maximum of four concurrent live calls are permitted before further calls need to wait for a slot. (2) If a call is waiting for a slot, it is deep inside sendmsg() or rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() and the entry function is holding the socket lock. (3) sendmsg() and recvmsg() or the in-kernel equivalents are prevented from servicing the other calls as they need to take the socket lock to do so. (4) The socket is stuck until a call is aborted and makes its slot available to the waiter. Fix this by: (1) Provide each call with a mutex ('user_mutex') that arbitrates access by the users of rxrpc separately for each specific call. (2) Make rxrpc_sendmsg() and rxrpc_recvmsg() unlock the socket as soon as they've got a call and taken its mutex. Note that I'm returning EWOULDBLOCK from recvmsg() if MSG_DONTWAIT is set but someone else has the lock. Should I instead only return EWOULDBLOCK if there's nothing currently to be done on a socket, and sleep in this particular instance because there is something to be done, but we appear to be blocked by the interrupt handler doing its ping? (3) Make rxrpc_new_client_call() unlock the socket after allocating a new call, locking its user mutex and adding it to the socket's call tree. The call is returned locked so that sendmsg() can add data to it immediately. From the moment the call is in the socket tree, it is subject to access by sendmsg() and recvmsg() - even if it isn't connected yet. (4) Lock new service calls in the UDP data_ready handler (in rxrpc_new_incoming_call()) because they may already be in the socket's tree and the data_ready handler makes them live immediately if a user ID has already been preassigned. Note that the new call is locked before any notifications are sent that it is live, so doing mutex_trylock() *ought* to always succeed. Userspace is prevented from doing sendmsg() on calls that are in a too-early state in rxrpc_do_sendmsg(). (5) Make rxrpc_new_incoming_call() return the call with the user mutex held so that a ping can be scheduled immediately under it. Note that it might be worth moving the ping call into rxrpc_new_incoming_call() and then we can drop the mutex there. (6) Make rxrpc_accept_call() take the lock on the call it is accepting and release the socket after adding the call to the socket's tree. This is slightly tricky as we've dequeued the call by that point and have to requeue it. Note that requeuing emits a trace event. (7) Make rxrpc_kernel_send_data() and rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() take the new mutex immediately and don't bother with the socket mutex at all. This patch has the nice bonus that calls on the same socket are now to some extent parallelisable. Note that we might want to move rxrpc_service_prealloc() calls out from the socket lock and give it its own lock, so that we don't hang progress in other calls because we're waiting for the allocator. We probably also want to avoid calling rxrpc_notify_socket() from within the socket lock (rxrpc_accept_call()). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-01-05rxrpc: Add some more tracingDavid Howells1-1/+5
Add the following extra tracing information: (1) Modify the rxrpc_transmit tracepoint to record the Tx window size as this is varied by the slow-start algorithm. (2) Modify the rxrpc_rx_ack tracepoint to record more information from received ACK packets. (3) Add an rxrpc_rx_data tracepoint to record the information in DATA packets. (4) Add an rxrpc_disconnect_call tracepoint to record call disconnection, including the reason the call was disconnected. (5) Add an rxrpc_improper_term tracepoint to record implicit termination of a call by a client either by starting a new call on a particular connection channel without first transmitting the final ACK for the previous call. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-01-05rxrpc: Fix handling of enums-to-string translation in tracingDavid Howells1-10/+0
Fix the way enum values are translated into strings in AF_RXRPC tracepoints. The problem with just doing a lookup in a normal flat array of strings or chars is that external tracing infrastructure can't find it. Rather, TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM must be used. Also sort the enums and string tables to make it easier to keep them in order so that a future patch to __print_symbolic() can be optimised to try a direct lookup into the table first before iterating over it. A couple of _proto() macro calls are removed because they refered to tables that got moved to the tracing infrastructure. The relevant data can be found by way of tracing. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-11-07udp: do fwd memory scheduling on dequeuePaolo Abeni1-4/+3
A new argument is added to __skb_recv_datagram to provide an explicit skb destructor, invoked under the receive queue lock. The UDP protocol uses such argument to perform memory reclaiming on dequeue, so that the UDP protocol does not set anymore skb->desctructor. Instead explicit memory reclaiming is performed at close() time and when skbs are removed from the receive queue. The in kernel UDP protocol users now need to call a skb_recv_udp() variant instead of skb_recv_datagram() to properly perform memory accounting on dequeue. Overall, this allows acquiring only once the receive queue lock on dequeue. Tested using pktgen with random src port, 64 bytes packet, wire-speed on a 10G link as sender and udp_sink as the receiver, using an l4 tuple rxhash to stress the contention, and one or more udp_sink instances with reuseport. nr sinks vanilla patched 1 440 560 3 2150 2300 6 3650 3800 9 4450 4600 12 6250 6450 v1 -> v2: - do rmem and allocated memory scheduling under the receive lock - do bulk scheduling in first_packet_length() and in udp_destruct_sock() - avoid the typdef for the dequeue callback Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-10-06rxrpc: Partially handle OpenAFS's improper termination of callsDavid Howells1-0/+37
OpenAFS doesn't always correctly terminate client calls that it makes - this includes calls the OpenAFS servers make to the cache manager service. It should end the client call with either: (1) An ACK that has firstPacket set to one greater than the seq number of the reply DATA packet with the LAST_PACKET flag set (thereby hard-ACK'ing all packets). nAcks should be 0 and acks[] should be empty (ie. no soft-ACKs). (2) An ACKALL packet. OpenAFS, though, may send an ACK packet with firstPacket set to the last seq number or less and soft-ACKs listed for all packets up to and including the last DATA packet. The transmitter, however, is obliged to keep the call live and the soft-ACK'd DATA packets around until they're hard-ACK'd as the receiver is permitted to drop any merely soft-ACK'd packet and request retransmission by sending an ACK packet with a NACK in it. Further, OpenAFS will also terminate a client call by beginning the next client call on the same connection channel. This implicitly completes the previous call. This patch handles implicit ACK of a call on a channel by the reception of the first packet of the next call on that channel. If another call doesn't come along to implicitly ACK a call, then we have to time the call out. There are some bugs there that will be addressed in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-10-06rxrpc: Fix loss of PING RESPONSE ACK production due to PING ACKsDavid Howells1-2/+2
Separate the output of PING ACKs from the output of other sorts of ACK so that if we receive a PING ACK and schedule transmission of a PING RESPONSE ACK, the response doesn't get cancelled by a PING ACK we happen to be scheduling transmission of at the same time. If a PING RESPONSE gets lost, the other side might just sit there waiting for it and refuse to proceed otherwise. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-10-06rxrpc: Only ping for lost reply in client callDavid Howells1-1/+2
When a reply is deemed lost, we send a ping to find out the other end received all the request data packets we sent. This should be limited to client calls and we shouldn't do this on service calls. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-30rxrpc: Keep the call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffiesDavid Howells1-1/+2
Keep that call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies so that they can be expressed as functions of RTT. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-30rxrpc: The offset field in struct rxrpc_skb_priv is unnecessaryDavid Howells1-11/+12
The offset field in struct rxrpc_skb_priv is unnecessary as the value can always be calculated. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-30rxrpc: Reduce ssthresh to peer's receive windowDavid Howells1-0/+2
When we receive an ACK from the peer that tells us what the peer's receive window (rwind) is, we should reduce ssthresh to rwind if rwind is smaller than ssthresh. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-30rxrpc: Switch to Congestion Avoidance mode at cwnd==ssthreshDavid Howells1-3/+3
Switch to Congestion Avoidance mode at cwnd == ssthresh rather than relying on cwnd getting incremented beyond ssthresh and the window size, the mode being shifted and then cwnd being corrected. We need to make sure we switch into CA mode so that we stop marking every packet for ACK. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-29rxrpc: Note serial number being ACK'd in the congestion management traceDavid Howells1-4/+4
Note the serial number of the packet being ACK'd in the congestion management trace rather than the serial number of the ACK packet. Whilst the serial number of the ACK packet is useful for matching ACK packet in the output of wireshark, the serial number that the ACK is in response to is of more use in working out how different trace lines relate. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-24rxrpc: Implement slow-startDavid Howells1-6/+163
Implement RxRPC slow-start, which is similar to RFC 5681 for TCP. A tracepoint is added to log the state of the congestion management algorithm and the decisions it makes. Notes: (1) Since we send fixed-size DATA packets (apart from the final packet in each phase), counters and calculations are in terms of packets rather than bytes. (2) The ACK packet carries the equivalent of TCP SACK. (3) The FLIGHT_SIZE calculation in RFC 5681 doesn't seem particularly suited to SACK of a small number of packets. It seems that, almost inevitably, by the time three 'duplicate' ACKs have been seen, we have narrowed the loss down to one or two missing packets, and the FLIGHT_SIZE calculation ends up as 2. (4) In rxrpc_resend(), if there was no data that apparently needed retransmission, we transmit a PING ACK to ask the peer to tell us what its Rx window state is. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-24rxrpc: Schedule an ACK if the reply to a client call appears overdueDavid Howells1-0/+8
If we've sent all the request data in a client call but haven't seen any sign of the reply data yet, schedule an ACK to be sent to the server to find out if the reply data got lost. If the server hasn't yet hard-ACK'd the request data, we send a PING ACK to demand a response to find out whether we need to retransmit. If the server says it has received all of the data, we send an IDLE ACK to tell the server that we haven't received anything in the receive phase as yet. To make this work, a non-immediate PING ACK must carry a delay. I've chosen the same as the IDLE ACK for the moment. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-24rxrpc: Generate a summary of the ACK state for later useDavid Howells1-11/+34
Generate a summary of the Tx buffer packet state when an ACK is received for use in a later patch that does congestion management. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-24rxrpc: Reinitialise the call ACK and timer state for client reply phaseDavid Howells1-0/+9
Clear the ACK reason, ACK timer and resend timer when entering the client reply phase when the first DATA packet is received. New ACKs will be proposed once the data is queued. The resend timer is no longer relevant and we need to cancel ACKs scheduled to probe for a lost reply. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-24rxrpc: Send an immediate ACK if we fill in a holeDavid Howells1-1/+9
Send an immediate ACK if we fill in a hole in the buffer left by an out-of-sequence packet. This may allow the congestion management in the peer to avoid a retransmission if packets got reordered on the wire. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-23rxrpc: Add tracepoint for ACK proposalDavid Howells1-6/+13
Add a tracepoint to log proposed ACKs, including whether the proposal is used to update a pending ACK or is discarded in favour of an easlier, higher priority ACK. Whilst we're at it, get rid of the rxrpc_acks() function and access the name array directly. We do, however, need to validate the ACK reason number given to trace_rxrpc_rx_ack() to make sure we don't overrun the array. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-23rxrpc: Add a tracepoint to log injected Rx packet lossDavid Howells1-6/+5
Add a tracepoint to log received packets that get discarded due to Rx packet loss. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-23rxrpc: Pass the last Tx packet marker in the annotation bufferDavid Howells1-35/+67
When the last packet of data to be transmitted on a call is queued, tx_top is set and then the RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST flag is set. Unfortunately, this leaves a race in the ACK processing side of things because the flag affects the interpretation of tx_top and also allows us to start receiving reply data before we've finished transmitting. To fix this, make the following changes: (1) rxrpc_queue_packet() now sets a marker in the annotation buffer instead of setting the RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST flag. (2) rxrpc_rotate_tx_window() detects the marker and sets the flag in the same context as the routines that use it. (3) rxrpc_end_tx_phase() is simplified to just shift the call state. The Tx window must have been rotated before calling to discard the last packet. (4) rxrpc_receiving_reply() is added to handle the arrival of the first DATA packet of a reply to a client call (which is an implicit ACK of the Tx phase). (5) The last part of rxrpc_input_ack() is reordered to perform Tx rotation, then soft-ACK application and then to end the phase if we've rotated the last packet. In the event of a terminal ACK, the soft-ACK application will be skipped as nAcks should be 0. (6) rxrpc_input_ackall() now has to rotate as well as ending the phase. In addition: (7) Alter the transmit tracepoint to log the rotation of the last packet. (8) Remove the no-longer relevant queue_reqack tracepoint note. The ACK-REQUESTED packet header flag is now set as needed when we actually transmit the packet and may vary by retransmission. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-23rxrpc: Fix accidental cancellation of scheduled resend by ACK parserDavid Howells1-0/+2
When rxrpc_input_soft_acks() is parsing the soft-ACKs from an ACK packet, it updates the Tx packet annotations in the annotation buffer. If a soft-ACK is an ACK, then we overwrite unack'd, nak'd or to-be-retransmitted states and that is fine; but if the soft-ACK is an NACK, we overwrite the to-be-retransmitted with a nak - which isn't. Instead, we need to let any scheduled retransmission stand if the packet was NAK'd. Note that we don't reissue a resend if the annotation is in the to-be-retransmitted state because someone else must've scheduled the resend already. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-23rxrpc: Use before_eq() and friends to compare serial numbersDavid Howells1-1/+1
before_eq() and friends should be used to compare serial numbers (when not checking for (non)equality) rather than casting to int, subtracting and checking the result. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-22rxrpc: Reduce the number of PING ACKs sentDavid Howells1-2/+5
We don't want to send a PING ACK for every new incoming call as that just adds to the network traffic. Instead, we send a PING ACK to the first three that we receive and then once per second thereafter. This could probably be made adjustable in future. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-22rxrpc: Obtain RTT data by requesting ACKs on DATA packetsDavid Howells1-0/+35
In addition to sending a PING ACK to gain RTT data, we can set the RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK flag on a DATA packet and get a REQUESTED-ACK ACK. The ACK packet contains the serial number of the packet it is in response to, so we can look through the Tx buffer for a matching DATA packet. This requires that the data packets be stamped with the time of transmission as a ktime rather than having the resend_at time in jiffies. This further requires the resend code to do the resend determination in ktimes and convert to jiffies to set the timer. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-22rxrpc: Send pings to get RTT dataDavid Howells1-1/+47
Send a PING ACK packet to the peer when we get a new incoming call from a peer we don't have a record for. The PING RESPONSE ACK packet will tell us the following about the peer: (1) its receive window size (2) its MTU sizes (3) its support for jumbo DATA packets (4) if it supports slow start (similar to RFC 5681) (5) an estimate of the RTT This is necessary because the peer won't normally send us an ACK until it gets to the Rx phase and we send it a packet, but we would like to know some of this information before we start sending packets. A pair of tracepoints are added so that RTT determination can be observed. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-22rxrpc: Add re-sent Tx annotationDavid Howells1-3/+11
Add a Tx-phase annotation for packet buffers to indicate that a buffer has already been retransmitted. This will be used by future congestion management. Re-retransmissions of a packet don't affect the congestion window managment in the same way as initial retransmissions. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Add config to inject packet lossDavid Howells1-0/+8
Add a configuration option to inject packet loss by discarding approximately every 8th packet received and approximately every 8th DATA packet transmitted. Note that no locking is used, but it shouldn't really matter. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Improve skb tracingDavid Howells1-6/+7
Improve sk_buff tracing within AF_RXRPC by the following means: (1) Use an enum to note the event type rather than plain integers and use an array of event names rather than a big multi ?: list. (2) Distinguish Rx from Tx packets and account them separately. This requires the call phase to be tracked so that we know what we might find in rxtx_buffer[]. (3) Add a parameter to rxrpc_{new,see,get,free}_skb() to indicate the event type. (4) A pair of 'rotate' events are added to indicate packets that are about to be rotated out of the Rx and Tx windows. (5) A pair of 'lost' events are added, along with rxrpc_lose_skb() for packet loss injection recording. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Add a tracepoint to follow packets in the Rx bufferDavid Howells1-1/+5
Add a tracepoint to follow the life of packets that get added to a call's receive buffer. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Add a tracepoint to log received ACK packetsDavid Howells1-0/+2
Add a tracepoint to log information from received ACK packets. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Add a tracepoint to follow the life of a packet in the Tx bufferDavid Howells1-0/+2
Add a tracepoint to follow the insertion of a packet into the transmit buffer, its transmission and its rotation out of the buffer. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Fix the parsing of soft-ACKsDavid Howells1-1/+1
The soft-ACK parser doesn't increment the pointer into the soft-ACK list, resulting in the first ACK/NACK value being applied to all the relevant packets in the Tx queue. This has the potential to miss retransmissions and cause excessive retransmissions. Fix this by incrementing the pointer. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Fix handling of the last packet in rxrpc_recvmsg_data()David Howells1-1/+3
The code for determining the last packet in rxrpc_recvmsg_data() has been using the RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST flag to determine if the rx_top pointer points to the last packet or not. This isn't a good idea, however, as the input code may be running simultaneously on another CPU and that sets the flag *before* updating the top pointer. Fix this by the following means: (1) Restrict the use of RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST to the input routines only. There's otherwise a synchronisation problem between detecting the flag and checking tx_top. This could probably be dealt with by appropriate application of memory barriers, but there's a simpler way. (2) Set RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST after setting rx_top. (3) Make rxrpc_rotate_rx_window() consult the flags header field of the DATA packet it's about to discard to see if that was the last packet. Use this as the basis for ending the Rx phase. This shouldn't be a problem because the recvmsg side of things is guaranteed to see the packets in order. (4) Make rxrpc_recvmsg_data() return 1 to indicate the end of the data if: (a) the packet it has just processed is marked as RXRPC_LAST_PACKET (b) the call's Rx phase has been ended. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>