aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-12-09net: rxrpc: convert comma to semicolonZheng Yongjun1-1/+1
Replace a comma between expression statements by a semicolon. Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-10-05rxrpc: Fix accept on a connection that need securingDavid Howells1-35/+1
When a new incoming call arrives at an userspace rxrpc socket on a new connection that has a security class set, the code currently pushes it onto the accept queue to hold a ref on it for the socket. This doesn't work, however, as recvmsg() pops it off, notices that it's in the SERVER_SECURING state and discards the ref. This means that the call runs out of refs too early and the kernel oopses. By contrast, a kernel rxrpc socket manually pre-charges the incoming call pool with calls that already have user call IDs assigned, so they are ref'd by the call tree on the socket. Change the mode of operation for userspace rxrpc server sockets to work like this too. Although this is a UAPI change, server sockets aren't currently functional. Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-08-23treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keywordGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
2020-07-30rxrpc: Fix race between recvmsg and sendmsg on immediate call failureDavid Howells1-1/+1
There's a race between rxrpc_sendmsg setting up a call, but then failing to send anything on it due to an error, and recvmsg() seeing the call completion occur and trying to return the state to the user. An assertion fails in rxrpc_recvmsg() because the call has already been released from the socket and is about to be released again as recvmsg deals with it. (The recvmsg_q queue on the socket holds a ref, so there's no problem with use-after-free.) We also have to be careful not to end up reporting an error twice, in such a way that both returns indicate to userspace that the user ID supplied with the call is no longer in use - which could cause the client to malfunction if it recycles the user ID fast enough. Fix this by the following means: (1) When sendmsg() creates a call after the point that the call has been successfully added to the socket, don't return any errors through sendmsg(), but rather complete the call and let recvmsg() retrieve them. Make sendmsg() return 0 at this point. Further calls to sendmsg() for that call will fail with ESHUTDOWN. Note that at this point, we haven't send any packets yet, so the server doesn't yet know about the call. (2) If sendmsg() returns an error when it was expected to create a new call, it means that the user ID wasn't used. (3) Mark the call disconnected before marking it completed to prevent an oops in rxrpc_release_call(). (4) recvmsg() will then retrieve the error and set MSG_EOR to indicate that the user ID is no longer known by the kernel. An oops like the following is produced: kernel BUG at net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:605! ... RIP: 0010:rxrpc_recvmsg+0x256/0x5ae ... Call Trace: ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x2f/0x2f ____sys_recvmsg+0x8a/0x148 ? import_iovec+0x69/0x9c ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x5c/0x86 ___sys_recvmsg+0x72/0xaa ? __fget_files+0x22/0x57 ? __fget_light+0x46/0x51 ? fdget+0x9/0x1b do_recvmmsg+0x15e/0x232 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0xa/0xb ? vtime_delta+0xf/0x25 __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x2c/0x2f do_syscall_64+0x4c/0x78 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fixes: 357f5ef64628 ("rxrpc: Call rxrpc_release_call() on error in rxrpc_new_client_call()") Reported-by: syzbot+b54969381df354936d96@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-07-20rxrpc: Fix sendmsg() returning EPIPE due to recvmsg() returning ENODATADavid Howells1-1/+1
rxrpc_sendmsg() returns EPIPE if there's an outstanding error, such as if rxrpc_recvmsg() indicating ENODATA if there's nothing for it to read. Change rxrpc_recvmsg() to return EAGAIN instead if there's nothing to read as this particular error doesn't get stored in ->sk_err by the networking core. Also change rxrpc_sendmsg() so that it doesn't fail with delayed receive errors (there's no way for it to report which call, if any, the error was caused by). Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-06-05rxrpc: Fix missing notificationDavid Howells1-8/+13
Under some circumstances, rxrpc will fail a transmit a packet through the underlying UDP socket (ie. UDP sendmsg returns an error). This may result in a call getting stuck. In the instance being seen, where AFS tries to send a probe to the Volume Location server, tracepoints show the UDP Tx failure (in this case returing error 99 EADDRNOTAVAIL) and then nothing more: afs_make_vl_call: c=0000015d VL.GetCapabilities rxrpc_call: c=0000015d NWc u=1 sp=rxrpc_kernel_begin_call+0x106/0x170 [rxrpc] a=00000000dd89ee8a rxrpc_call: c=0000015d Gus u=2 sp=rxrpc_new_client_call+0x14f/0x580 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08 rxrpc_call: c=0000015d SEE u=2 sp=rxrpc_activate_one_channel+0x7b/0x1c0 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08 rxrpc_call: c=0000015d CON u=2 sp=rxrpc_kernel_begin_call+0x106/0x170 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08 rxrpc_tx_fail: c=0000015d r=1 ret=-99 CallDataNofrag The problem is that if the initial packet fails and the retransmission timer hasn't been started, the call is set to completed and an error is returned from rxrpc_send_data_packet() to rxrpc_queue_packet(). Though rxrpc_instant_resend() is called, this does nothing because the call is marked completed. So rxrpc_notify_socket() isn't called and the error is passed back up to rxrpc_send_data(), rxrpc_kernel_send_data() and thence to afs_make_call() and afs_vl_get_capabilities() where it is simply ignored because it is assumed that the result of a probe will be collected asynchronously. Fileserver probing is similarly affected via afs_fs_get_capabilities(). Fix this by always issuing a notification in __rxrpc_set_call_completion() if it shifts a call to the completed state, even if an error is also returned to the caller through the function return value. Also put in a little bit of optimisation to avoid taking the call state_lock and disabling softirqs if the call is already in the completed state and remove some now redundant rxrpc_notify_socket() calls. Fixes: f5c17aaeb2ae ("rxrpc: Calls should only have one terminal state") Reported-by: Gerry Seidman <gerry@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
2020-06-05rxrpc: Move the call completion handling out of lineDavid Howells1-0/+74
Move the handling of call completion out of line so that the next patch can add more code in that area. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
2019-10-31rxrpc: Fix handling of last subpacket of jumbo packetDavid Howells1-5/+13
When rxrpc_recvmsg_data() sets the return value to 1 because it's drained all the data for the last packet, it checks the last-packet flag on the whole packet - but this is wrong, since the last-packet flag is only set on the final subpacket of the last jumbo packet. This means that a call that receives its last packet in a jumbo packet won't complete properly. Fix this by having rxrpc_locate_data() determine the last-packet state of the subpacket it's looking at and passing that back to the caller rather than having the caller look in the packet header. The caller then needs to cache this in the rxrpc_call struct as rxrpc_locate_data() isn't then called again for this packet. Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Fixes: e2de6c404898 ("rxrpc: Use info in skbuff instead of reparsing a jumbo packet") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-10-07rxrpc: Fix call crypto state cleanupDavid Howells1-3/+3
Fix the cleanup of the crypto state on a call after the call has been disconnected. As the call has been disconnected, its connection ref has been discarded and so we can't go through that to get to the security ops table. Fix this by caching the security ops pointer in the rxrpc_call struct and using that when freeing the call security state. Also use this in other places we're dealing with call-specific security. The symptoms look like: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rxrpc_release_call+0xb2d/0xb60 net/rxrpc/call_object.c:481 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888062ffeb50 by task syz-executor.5/4764 Fixes: 1db88c534371 ("rxrpc: Fix -Wframe-larger-than= warnings from on-stack crypto") Reported-by: syzbot+eed305768ece6682bb7f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-08-27rxrpc: Use the tx-phase skb flag to simplify tracingDavid Howells1-3/+3
Use the previously-added transmit-phase skbuff private flag to simplify the socket buffer tracing a bit. Which phase the skbuff comes from can now be divined from the skb rather than having to be guessed from the call state. We can also reduce the number of rxrpc_skb_trace values by eliminating the difference between Tx and Rx in the symbols. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-08-27rxrpc: Use info in skbuff instead of reparsing a jumbo packetDavid Howells1-17/+24
Use the information now cached in the skbuff private data to avoid the need to reparse a jumbo packet. We can find all the subpackets by dead reckoning, so it's only necessary to note how many there are, whether the last one is flagged as LAST_PACKET and whether any have the REQUEST_ACK flag set. This is necessary as once recvmsg() can see the packet, it can start modifying it, such as doing in-place decryption. Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2019-08-09rxrpc: Don't bother generating maxSkew in the ACK packetDavid Howells1-3/+3
Don't bother generating maxSkew in the ACK packet as it has been obsolete since AFS 3.1. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
2019-05-30treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152Thomas Gleixner1-5/+1
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-02-06rxrpc: bad unlock balance in rxrpc_recvmsgEric Dumazet1-1/+2
When either "goto wait_interrupted;" or "goto wait_error;" paths are taken, socket lock has already been released. This patch fixes following syzbot splat : WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! 5.0.0-rc4+ #59 Not tainted ------------------------------------- syz-executor223/8256 is trying to release lock (sk_lock-AF_RXRPC) at: [<ffffffff86651353>] rxrpc_recvmsg+0x6d3/0x3099 net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:598 but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by syz-executor223/8256: #0: 00000000fa9ed0f4 (slock-AF_RXRPC){+...}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:334 [inline] #0: 00000000fa9ed0f4 (slock-AF_RXRPC){+...}, at: release_sock+0x20/0x1c0 net/core/sock.c:2798 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 8256 Comm: syz-executor223 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4+ #59 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_unlock_imbalance_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3391 [inline] print_unlock_imbalance_bug.cold+0x114/0x123 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3368 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3601 [inline] lock_release+0x67e/0xa00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3860 sock_release_ownership include/net/sock.h:1471 [inline] release_sock+0x183/0x1c0 net/core/sock.c:2808 rxrpc_recvmsg+0x6d3/0x3099 net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:598 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:794 [inline] sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:801 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0xd0/0x110 net/socket.c:797 __sys_recvfrom+0x1ff/0x350 net/socket.c:1845 __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:1863 [inline] __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:1859 [inline] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0xe1/0x1a0 net/socket.c:1859 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x446379 Code: e8 2c b3 02 00 48 83 c4 18 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 2b 09 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007fe5da89fd98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002d RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000006dbc28 RCX: 0000000000446379 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00000000006dbc20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000006dbc2c R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 20c49ba5e353f7cf Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-10-04rxrpc: Allow the reply time to be obtained on a client callDavid Howells1-0/+43
Allow the timestamp on the sk_buff holding the first DATA packet of a reply to be queried. This can then be used as a base for the expiry time calculation on the callback promise duration indicated by an operation result. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2018-08-03rxrpc: Push iov_iter up from rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() to callerDavid Howells1-22/+11
Push iov_iter up from rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() to its caller to allow non-contiguous iovs to be passed down, thereby permitting file reading to be simplified in the AFS filesystem in a future patch. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-08-01rxrpc: Transmit more ACKs during data receptionDavid Howells1-0/+17
Immediately flush any outstanding ACK on entry to rxrpc_recvmsg_data() - which transfers data to the target buffers - if we previously had an Rx underrun (ie. we returned -EAGAIN because we ran out of received data). This lets the server know what we've managed to receive something. Also flush any outstanding ACK after calling the function if it hit -EAGAIN to let the server know we processed some data. It might be better to send more ACKs, possibly on a time-based scheme, but that needs some more consideration. With this and some additional AFS patches, it is possible to get large unencrypted O_DIRECT reads to be almost as fast as NFS over TCP. It looks like it might be theoretically possible to improve performance yet more for a server running a single operation as investigation of packet timestamps indicates that the server keeps stalling. The issue appears to be that rxrpc runs in to trouble with ACK packets getting batched together (up to ~32 at a time) somewhere between the IP transmit queue on the client and the ethernet receive queue on the server. However, this case isn't too much of a worry as even a lightly loaded server should be receiving sufficient packet flux to flush the ACK packets to the UDP socket. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2018-08-01rxrpc: Propose, but don't immediately transmit, the final ACK for a callDavid Howells1-4/+2
The final ACK that closes out an rxrpc call needs to be transmitted by the client unless we're going to follow up with a DATA packet for a new call on the same channel (which implicitly ACK's the previous call, thereby saving an ACK). Currently, we don't do that, so if no follow on call is immediately forthcoming, the server will resend the last DATA packet - at which point rxrpc_conn_retransmit_call() will be triggered and will (re)send the final ACK. But the server has to hold on to the last packet until the ACK is received, thereby holding up its resources. Fix the client side to propose a delayed final ACK, to be transmitted after a short delay, assuming the call isn't superseded by a new one. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2018-03-16rxrpc: remove redundant initialization of variable 'len'Colin Ian King1-1/+1
The variable 'len' is being initialized with a value that is never read and it is re-assigned later, hence the initialization is redundant and can be removed. Cleans up clang warning: net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:275:15: warning: Value stored to 'len' during its initialization is never read Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-02-16rxrpc: Work around usercopy checkDavid Howells1-2/+3
Due to a check recently added to copy_to_user(), it's now not permitted to copy from slab-held data to userspace unless the slab is whitelisted. This affects rxrpc_recvmsg() when it attempts to place an RXRPC_USER_CALL_ID control message in the userspace control message buffer. A warning is generated by usercopy_warn() because the source is the copy of the user_call_ID retained in the rxrpc_call struct. Work around the issue by copying the user_call_ID to a variable on the stack and passing that to put_cmsg(). The warning generated looks like: Bad or missing usercopy whitelist? Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'dmaengine-unmap-128' (offset 680, size 8)! WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1401 at mm/usercopy.c:81 usercopy_warn+0x7e/0xa0 ... RIP: 0010:usercopy_warn+0x7e/0xa0 ... Call Trace: __check_object_size+0x9c/0x1a0 put_cmsg+0x98/0x120 rxrpc_recvmsg+0x6fc/0x1010 [rxrpc] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 ___sys_recvmsg+0xf8/0x240 ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? finish_task_switch+0xa6/0x2b0 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xed/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40 ? __sys_recvmsg+0x4e/0x90 __sys_recvmsg+0x4e/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x7a/0x220 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x26/0x9b Reported-by: Jonathan Billings <jsbillings@jsbillings.org> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Tested-by: Jonathan Billings <jsbillings@jsbillings.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-11-24rxrpc: Add a timeout for detecting lost ACKs/lost DATADavid Howells1-2/+2
Add an extra timeout that is set/updated when we send a DATA packet that has the request-ack flag set. This allows us to detect if we don't get an ACK in response to the latest flagged packet. The ACK packet is adjudged to have been lost if it doesn't turn up within 2*RTT of the transmission. If the timeout occurs, we schedule the sending of a PING ACK to find out the state of the other side. If a new DATA packet is ready to go sooner, we cancel the sending of the ping and set the request-ack flag on that instead. If we get back a PING-RESPONSE ACK that indicates a lower tx_top than what we had at the time of the ping transmission, we adjudge all the DATA packets sent between the response tx_top and the ping-time tx_top to have been lost and retransmit immediately. Rather than sending a PING ACK, we could just pick a DATA packet and speculatively retransmit that with request-ack set. It should result in either a REQUESTED ACK or a DUPLICATE ACK which we can then use in lieu the a PING-RESPONSE ACK mentioned above. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-11-24rxrpc: Don't transmit DELAY ACKs immediately on proposalDavid Howells1-2/+2
Don't transmit a DELAY ACK immediately on proposal when the Rx window is rotated, but rather defer it to the work function. This means that we have a chance to queue/consume more received packets before we actually send the DELAY ACK, or even cancel it entirely, thereby reducing the number of packets transmitted. We do, however, want to continue sending other types of packet immediately, particularly REQUESTED ACKs, as they may be used for RTT calculation by the other side. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-11-24rxrpc: Fix call timeoutsDavid Howells1-1/+1
Fix the rxrpc call expiration timeouts and make them settable from userspace. By analogy with other rx implementations, there should be three timeouts: (1) "Normal timeout" This is set for all calls and is triggered if we haven't received any packets from the peer in a while. It is measured from the last time we received any packet on that call. This is not reset by any connection packets (such as CHALLENGE/RESPONSE packets). If a service operation takes a long time, the server should generate PING ACKs at a duration that's substantially less than the normal timeout so is to keep both sides alive. This is set at 1/6 of normal timeout. (2) "Idle timeout" This is set only for a service call and is triggered if we stop receiving the DATA packets that comprise the request data. It is measured from the last time we received a DATA packet. (3) "Hard timeout" This can be set for a call and specified the maximum lifetime of that call. It should not be specified by default. Some operations (such as volume transfer) take a long time. Allow userspace to set/change the timeouts on a call with sendmsg, using a control message: RXRPC_SET_CALL_TIMEOUTS The data to the message is a number of 32-bit words, not all of which need be given: u32 hard_timeout; /* sec from first packet */ u32 idle_timeout; /* msec from packet Rx */ u32 normal_timeout; /* msec from data Rx */ This can be set in combination with any other sendmsg() that affects a call. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-11-24rxrpc: Delay terminal ACK transmission on a client callDavid Howells1-0/+2
Delay terminal ACK transmission on a client call by deferring it to the connection processor. This allows it to be skipped if we can send the next call instead, the first DATA packet of which will implicitly ack this call. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-11-02rxrpc: Lock around calling a kernel service Rx notificationDavid Howells1-0/+2
Place a spinlock around the invocation of call->notify_rx() for a kernel service call and lock again when ending the call and replace the notification pointer with a pointer to a dummy function. This is required because it's possible for rxrpc_notify_socket() to be called after the call has been ended by the kernel service if called from the asynchronous work function rxrpc_process_call(). However, rxrpc_notify_socket() currently only holds the RCU read lock when invoking ->notify_rx(), which means that the afs_call struct would need to be disposed of by call_rcu() rather than by kfree(). But we shouldn't see any notifications from a call after calling rxrpc_kernel_end_call(), so a lock is required in rxrpc code. Without this, we may see the call wait queue as having a corrupt spinlock: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, kworker/0:2/1612 general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP ... Workqueue: krxrpcd rxrpc_process_call task: ffff88040b83c400 task.stack: ffff88040adfc000 RIP: 0010:spin_bug+0x161/0x18f RSP: 0018:ffff88040adffcc0 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: 0000000000000032 RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX: ffffffff81ab16cf RDX: ffff88041fa14c01 RSI: ffff88041fa0ccb8 RDI: ffff88041fa0ccb8 RBP: ffff88040adffcd8 R08: 00000000ffffffff R09: 00000000ffffffff R10: ffff88040adffc60 R11: 000000000000022c R12: ffff88040aca2208 R13: ffffffff81a58114 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 .... Call Trace: do_raw_spin_lock+0x1d/0x89 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x49 ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x4c/0xa7 __wake_up_common_lock+0x4c/0xa7 ? __lock_is_held+0x47/0x7a __wake_up+0xe/0x10 afs_wake_up_call_waiter+0x11b/0x122 [kafs] rxrpc_notify_socket+0x12b/0x258 rxrpc_process_call+0x18e/0x7d0 process_one_work+0x298/0x4de ? rescuer_thread+0x280/0x280 worker_thread+0x1d1/0x2ae ? rescuer_thread+0x280/0x280 kthread+0x12c/0x134 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x3a/0x3a ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 In this case, note the corrupt data in EBX. The address of the offending afs_call is in R12, plus the offset to the spinlock. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-10-18rxrpc: Support service upgrade from a kernel serviceDavid Howells1-1/+4
Provide support for a kernel service to make use of the service upgrade facility. This involves: (1) Pass an upgrade request flag to rxrpc_kernel_begin_call(). (2) Make rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() return the call's current service ID so that the caller can detect service upgrade and see what the service was upgraded to. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-06-05rxrpc: Separate the connection's protocol service ID from the lookup IDDavid Howells1-2/+5
Keep the rxrpc_connection struct's idea of the service ID that is exposed in the protocol separate from the service ID that's used as a lookup key. This allows the protocol service ID on a client connection to get upgraded without making the connection unfindable for other client calls that also would like to use the upgraded connection. The connection's actual service ID is then returned through recvmsg() by way of msg_name. Whilst we're at it, we get rid of the last_service_id field from each channel. The service ID is per-connection, not per-call and an entire connection is upgraded in one go. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-04-06rxrpc: Trace protocol errors in received packetsDavid Howells1-0/+2
Add a tracepoint (rxrpc_rx_proto) to record protocol errors in received packets. The following changes are made: (1) Add a function, __rxrpc_abort_eproto(), to note a protocol error on a call and mark the call aborted. This is wrapped by rxrpc_abort_eproto() that makes the why string usable in trace. (2) Add trace_rxrpc_rx_proto() or rxrpc_abort_eproto() to protocol error generation points, replacing rxrpc_abort_call() with the latter. (3) Only send an abort packet in rxkad_verify_packet*() if we actually managed to abort the call. Note that a trace event is also emitted if a kernel user (e.g. afs) tries to send data through a call when it's not in the transmission phase, though it's not technically a receive event. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-04-06rxrpc: Use negative error codes in rxrpc_call structDavid Howells1-3/+3
Use negative error codes in struct rxrpc_call::error because that's what the kernel normally deals with and to make the code consistent. We only turn them positive when transcribing into a cmsg for userspace recvmsg. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2017-03-07rxrpc: Call state should be read with READ_ONCE() under some circumstancesDavid Howells1-2/+2
The call state may be changed at any time by the data-ready routine in response to received packets, so if the call state is to be read and acted upon several times in a function, READ_ONCE() must be used unless the call state lock is held. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-03-04Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netLinus Torvalds1-6/+33
Pull networking fixes from David Miller: 1) Fix double-free in batman-adv, from Sven Eckelmann. 2) Fix packet stats for fast-RX path, from Joannes Berg. 3) Netfilter's ip_route_me_harder() doesn't handle request sockets properly, fix from Florian Westphal. 4) Fix sendmsg deadlock in rxrpc, from David Howells. 5) Add missing RCU locking to transport hashtable scan, from Xin Long. 6) Fix potential packet loss in mlxsw driver, from Ido Schimmel. 7) Fix race in NAPI handling between poll handlers and busy polling, from Eric Dumazet. 8) TX path in vxlan and geneve need proper RCU locking, from Jakub Kicinski. 9) SYN processing in DCCP and TCP need to disable BH, from Eric Dumazet. 10) Properly handle net_enable_timestamp() being invoked from IRQ context, also from Eric Dumazet. 11) Fix crash on device-tree systems in xgene driver, from Alban Bedel. 12) Do not call sk_free() on a locked socket, from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo. 13) Fix use-after-free in netvsc driver, from Dexuan Cui. 14) Fix max MTU setting in bonding driver, from WANG Cong. 15) xen-netback hash table can be allocated from softirq context, so use GFP_ATOMIC. From Anoob Soman. 16) Fix MAC address change bug in bgmac driver, from Hari Vyas. 17) strparser needs to destroy strp_wq on module exit, from WANG Cong. * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net: (69 commits) strparser: destroy workqueue on module exit sfc: fix IPID endianness in TSOv2 sfc: avoid max() in array size rds: remove unnecessary returned value check rxrpc: Fix potential NULL-pointer exception nfp: correct DMA direction in XDP DMA sync nfp: don't tell FW about the reserved buffer space net: ethernet: bgmac: mac address change bug net: ethernet: bgmac: init sequence bug xen-netback: don't vfree() queues under spinlock xen-netback: keep a local pointer for vif in backend_disconnect() netfilter: nf_tables: don't call nfnetlink_set_err() if nfnetlink_send() fails netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: incorrect assumption on lower interval lookups netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix wrong memory initialisation can: flexcan: fix typo in comment can: usb_8dev: Fix memory leak of priv->cmd_msg_buffer can: gs_usb: fix coding style can: gs_usb: Don't use stack memory for USB transfers ixgbe: Limit use of 2K buffers on architectures with 256B or larger cache lines ixgbe: update the rss key on h/w, when ethtool ask for it ...
2017-03-02sched/headers: Prepare to move signal wakeup & sigpending methods from <linux/sched.h> into <linux/sched/signal.h>Ingo Molnar1-0/+2
Fix up affected files that include this signal functionality via sched.h. Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-03-01rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsgDavid Howells1-6/+33
All the routines by which rxrpc is accessed from the outside are serialised by means of the socket lock (sendmsg, recvmsg, bind, rxrpc_kernel_begin_call(), ...) and this presents a problem: (1) If a number of calls on the same socket are in the process of connection to the same peer, a maximum of four concurrent live calls are permitted before further calls need to wait for a slot. (2) If a call is waiting for a slot, it is deep inside sendmsg() or rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() and the entry function is holding the socket lock. (3) sendmsg() and recvmsg() or the in-kernel equivalents are prevented from servicing the other calls as they need to take the socket lock to do so. (4) The socket is stuck until a call is aborted and makes its slot available to the waiter. Fix this by: (1) Provide each call with a mutex ('user_mutex') that arbitrates access by the users of rxrpc separately for each specific call. (2) Make rxrpc_sendmsg() and rxrpc_recvmsg() unlock the socket as soon as they've got a call and taken its mutex. Note that I'm returning EWOULDBLOCK from recvmsg() if MSG_DONTWAIT is set but someone else has the lock. Should I instead only return EWOULDBLOCK if there's nothing currently to be done on a socket, and sleep in this particular instance because there is something to be done, but we appear to be blocked by the interrupt handler doing its ping? (3) Make rxrpc_new_client_call() unlock the socket after allocating a new call, locking its user mutex and adding it to the socket's call tree. The call is returned locked so that sendmsg() can add data to it immediately. From the moment the call is in the socket tree, it is subject to access by sendmsg() and recvmsg() - even if it isn't connected yet. (4) Lock new service calls in the UDP data_ready handler (in rxrpc_new_incoming_call()) because they may already be in the socket's tree and the data_ready handler makes them live immediately if a user ID has already been preassigned. Note that the new call is locked before any notifications are sent that it is live, so doing mutex_trylock() *ought* to always succeed. Userspace is prevented from doing sendmsg() on calls that are in a too-early state in rxrpc_do_sendmsg(). (5) Make rxrpc_new_incoming_call() return the call with the user mutex held so that a ping can be scheduled immediately under it. Note that it might be worth moving the ping call into rxrpc_new_incoming_call() and then we can drop the mutex there. (6) Make rxrpc_accept_call() take the lock on the call it is accepting and release the socket after adding the call to the socket's tree. This is slightly tricky as we've dequeued the call by that point and have to requeue it. Note that requeuing emits a trace event. (7) Make rxrpc_kernel_send_data() and rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() take the new mutex immediately and don't bother with the socket mutex at all. This patch has the nice bonus that calls on the same socket are now to some extent parallelisable. Note that we might want to move rxrpc_service_prealloc() calls out from the socket lock and give it its own lock, so that we don't hang progress in other calls because we're waiting for the allocator. We probably also want to avoid calling rxrpc_notify_socket() from within the socket lock (rxrpc_accept_call()). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-02-26rxrpc: Kernel calls get stuck in recvmsgDavid Howells1-2/+6
Calls made through the in-kernel interface can end up getting stuck because of a missed variable update in a loop in rxrpc_recvmsg_data(). The problem is like this: (1) A new packet comes in and doesn't cause a notification to be given to the client as there's still another packet in the ring - the assumption being that if the client will keep drawing off data until the ring is empty. (2) The client is in rxrpc_recvmsg_data(), inside the big while loop that iterates through the packets. This copies the window pointers into variables rather than using the information in the call struct because: (a) MSG_PEEK might be in effect; (b) we need a barrier after reading call->rx_top to pair with the barrier in the softirq routine that loads the buffer. (3) The reading of call->rx_top is done outside of the loop, and top is never updated whilst we're in the loop. This means that even through there's a new packet available, we don't see it and may return -EFAULT to the caller - who will happily return to the scheduler and await the next notification. (4) No further notifications are forthcoming until there's an abort as the ring isn't empty. The fix is to move the read of call->rx_top inside the loop - but it needs to be done before the condition is checked. Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-10-06rxrpc: Need to produce an ACK for service op if op takes a long timeDavid Howells1-2/+6
We need to generate a DELAY ACK from the service end of an operation if we start doing the actual operation work and it takes longer than expected. This will hard-ACK the request data and allow the client to release its resources. To make this work: (1) We have to set the ack timer and propose an ACK when the call moves to the RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACK_REQUEST and clear the pending ACK and cancel the timer when we start transmitting the reply (the first DATA packet of the reply implicitly ACKs the request phase). (2) It must be possible to set the timer when the caller is holding call->state_lock, so split the lock-getting part of the timer function out. (3) Add trace notes for the ACK we're requesting and the timer we clear. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-10-06rxrpc: Return negative error code to kernel serviceDavid Howells1-1/+1
In rxrpc_kernel_recv_data(), when we return the error number incurred by a failed call, we must negate it before returning it as it's stored as positive (that's what we have to pass back to userspace). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-10-06rxrpc: Fix loss of PING RESPONSE ACK production due to PING ACKsDavid Howells1-2/+2
Separate the output of PING ACKs from the output of other sorts of ACK so that if we receive a PING ACK and schedule transmission of a PING RESPONSE ACK, the response doesn't get cancelled by a PING ACK we happen to be scheduling transmission of at the same time. If a PING RESPONSE gets lost, the other side might just sit there waiting for it and refuse to proceed otherwise. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-10-06rxrpc: Fix warning by splitting rxrpc_send_call_packet()David Howells1-2/+2
Split rxrpc_send_data_packet() to separate ACK generation (which is more complicated) from ABORT generation. This simplifies the code a bit and fixes the following warning: In file included from ../net/rxrpc/output.c:20:0: net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_send_call_packet': net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h:1187:27: error: 'top' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] net/rxrpc/output.c:103:24: note: 'top' was declared here net/rxrpc/output.c:225:25: error: 'hard_ack' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-30rxrpc: The offset field in struct rxrpc_skb_priv is unnecessaryDavid Howells1-4/+2
The offset field in struct rxrpc_skb_priv is unnecessary as the value can always be calculated. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-24rxrpc: Include the last reply DATA serial number in the final ACKDavid Howells1-3/+3
In a client call, include the serial number of the last DATA packet of the reply in the final ACK. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-24rxrpc: Send an ACK after every few DATA packets we receiveDavid Howells1-1/+12
Send an ACK if we haven't sent one for the last two packets we've received. This keeps the other end apprised of where we've got to - which is important if they're doing slow-start. We do this in recvmsg so that we can dispatch a packet directly without the need to wake up the background thread. This should possibly be made configurable in future. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-23rxrpc: Add tracepoint for ACK proposalDavid Howells1-1/+2
Add a tracepoint to log proposed ACKs, including whether the proposal is used to update a pending ACK or is discarded in favour of an easlier, higher priority ACK. Whilst we're at it, get rid of the rxrpc_acks() function and access the name array directly. We do, however, need to validate the ACK reason number given to trace_rxrpc_rx_ack() to make sure we don't overrun the array. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-23rxrpc: Don't send an ACK at the end of service call response transmissionDavid Howells1-2/+0
Don't send an IDLE ACK at the end of the transmission of the response to a service call. The service end resends DATA packets until the client sends an ACK that hard-acks all the send data. At that point, the call is complete. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Improve skb tracingDavid Howells1-3/+4
Improve sk_buff tracing within AF_RXRPC by the following means: (1) Use an enum to note the event type rather than plain integers and use an array of event names rather than a big multi ?: list. (2) Distinguish Rx from Tx packets and account them separately. This requires the call phase to be tracked so that we know what we might find in rxtx_buffer[]. (3) Add a parameter to rxrpc_{new,see,get,free}_skb() to indicate the event type. (4) A pair of 'rotate' events are added to indicate packets that are about to be rotated out of the Rx and Tx windows. (5) A pair of 'lost' events are added, along with rxrpc_lose_skb() for packet loss injection recording. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Remove printks from rxrpc_recvmsg_data() to fix uninit varDavid Howells1-8/+0
Remove _enter/_debug/_leave calls from rxrpc_recvmsg_data() of which one uses an uninitialised variable. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Add a tracepoint to follow what recvmsg doesDavid Howells1-8/+26
Add a tracepoint to follow what recvmsg does within AF_RXRPC. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Add a tracepoint to follow packets in the Rx bufferDavid Howells1-0/+11
Add a tracepoint to follow the life of packets that get added to a call's receive buffer. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Fix handling of the last packet in rxrpc_recvmsg_data()David Howells1-16/+33
The code for determining the last packet in rxrpc_recvmsg_data() has been using the RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST flag to determine if the rx_top pointer points to the last packet or not. This isn't a good idea, however, as the input code may be running simultaneously on another CPU and that sets the flag *before* updating the top pointer. Fix this by the following means: (1) Restrict the use of RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST to the input routines only. There's otherwise a synchronisation problem between detecting the flag and checking tx_top. This could probably be dealt with by appropriate application of memory barriers, but there's a simpler way. (2) Set RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST after setting rx_top. (3) Make rxrpc_rotate_rx_window() consult the flags header field of the DATA packet it's about to discard to see if that was the last packet. Use this as the basis for ending the Rx phase. This shouldn't be a problem because the recvmsg side of things is guaranteed to see the packets in order. (4) Make rxrpc_recvmsg_data() return 1 to indicate the end of the data if: (a) the packet it has just processed is marked as RXRPC_LAST_PACKET (b) the call's Rx phase has been ended. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Check the return value of rxrpc_locate_data()David Howells1-1/+4
Check the return value of rxrpc_locate_data() in rxrpc_recvmsg_data(). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2016-09-17rxrpc: Move the check of rx_pkt_offset from rxrpc_locate_data() to callerDavid Howells1-5/+4
Move the check of rx_pkt_offset from rxrpc_locate_data() to the caller, rxrpc_recvmsg_data(), so that it's more clear what's going on there. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>