aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2009-11-23sctp: Fix malformed "Invalid Stream Identifier" errorVlad Yasevich1-4/+9
The "Invalid Stream Identifier" error has a 16 bit reserved field at the end, thus making the parameter length be 8 bytes. We've never supplied that reserved field making wireshark tag the packet as malformed. Reported-by: Chris Dischino <cdischino@sonusnet.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2009-09-04sctp: update the route for non-active transports after addresses are addedWei Yongjun1-0/+8
Update the route and saddr entries for the non-active transports as some of the added addresses can be used as better source addresses, or may be there is a better route. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2009-09-04sctp: check the unrecognized ASCONF parameter before access itWei Yongjun1-3/+5
This patch fix to check the unrecognized ASCONF parameter before access it. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2009-09-04sctp: avoid overwrite the return value of sctp_process_asconf_ack()Wei Yongjun1-6/+3
The return value of sctp_process_asconf_ack() may be overwritten while process parameters with no error. This patch fixed the problem. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2009-06-03sctp: fix the error code when ASCONF is received with invalid addressWei Yongjun1-6/+6
Use Unresolvable Address error cause instead of Invalid Mandatory Parameter error cause when process ASCONF chunk with invalid address since address parameters are not mandatory in the ASCONF chunk. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2009-06-03sctp: fix report unrecognized parameter in ACSONF-ACKWei Yongjun1-2/+2
RFC5061 Section 5.2. Upon Reception of an ASCONF Chunk V2) In processing the chunk, the receiver should build a response message with the appropriate error TLVs, as specified in the Parameter type bits, for any ASCONF Parameter it does not understand. To indicate an unrecognized parameter, Cause Type 8 should be used as defined in the ERROR in Section 3.3.10.8, [RFC4960]. The endpoint may also use the response to carry rejections for other reasons, such as resource shortages, etc., using the Error Cause TLV and an appropriate error condition. So we should indicate an unrecognized parameter with error SCTP_ERROR_UNKNOWN_PARAM in ACSONF-ACK chunk, not SCTP_ERROR_INV_PARAM. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2009-03-13sctp: add Adaptation Layer Indication parameter only when it's setmalc1-10/+19
RFC5061 states: Each adaptation layer that is defined that wishes to use this parameter MUST specify an adaptation code point in an appropriate RFC defining its use and meaning. If the user has not set one - assume they don't want to sent the param with a zero Adaptation Code Point. Rationale - Currently the IANA defines zero as reserved - and 1 as the only valid value - so we consider zero to be unset - to save adding a boolean to the socket structure. Including this parameter unconditionally causes endpoints that do not understand it to report errors unnecessarily. Signed-off-by: Malcolm Lashley <mlashley@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-03-13sctp: fix to indicate ASCONF support in INIT-ACK only if peer has such capableWei Yongjun1-2/+2
This patch fix to indicate ASCONF support in INIT-ACK only if peer has such capable. This patch also fix to calc the chunk size if peer has no FWD-TSN capable. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-02-01net: replace uses of __constant_{endian}Harvey Harrison1-2/+2
Base versions handle constant folding now. Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-10-08sctp: shrink sctp_tsnmap some more by removing gabs arrayVlad Yasevich1-2/+4
The gabs array in the sctp_tsnmap structure is only used in one place, sctp_make_sack(). As such, carrying the array around in the sctp_tsnmap and thus directly in the sctp_association is rather pointless since most of the time it's just taking up space. Now, let sctp_make_sack create and populate it and then throw it away when it's done. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-10-08sctp: Rework the tsn map to use generic bitmap.Vlad Yasevich1-2/+3
The tsn map currently use is 4K large and is stuck inside the sctp_association structure making memory references REALLY expensive. What we really need is at most 4K worth of bits so the biggest map we would have is 512 bytes. Also, the map is only really usefull when we have gaps to store and report. As such, starting with minimal map of say 32 TSNs (bits) should be enough for normal low-loss operations. We can grow the map by some multiple of 32 along with some extra room any time we receive the TSN which would put us outside of the map boundry. As we close gaps, we can shift the map to rebase it on the latest TSN we've seen. This saves 4088 bytes per association just in the map alone along savings from the now unnecessary structure members. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-10-01sctp: correctly save sctp_adaptation from parameter.Vlad Yasevich1-1/+1
The INIT perameter carries the adapatation value in network-byte order. We need to store it in host byte order as expected by data types and the user API. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2008-10-01sctp: reduce memory footprint of sctp_chunk structureNeil Horman1-1/+1
sctp_chunks should be put on a diet. This is some of the low hanging fruit that we can strip out. Changes all the __s8/__u8 flags to bitfields. Saves 12 bytes per chunk. Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2008-09-30sctp: Fix kernel panic while process protocol violation parameterWei Yongjun1-13/+24
Since call to function sctp_sf_abort_violation() need paramter 'arg' with 'struct sctp_chunk' type, it will read the chunk type and chunk length from the chunk_hdr member of chunk. But call to sctp_sf_violation_paramlen() always with 'struct sctp_paramhdr' type's parameter, it will be passed to sctp_sf_abort_violation(). This may cause kernel panic. sctp_sf_violation_paramlen() |-- sctp_sf_abort_violation() |-- sctp_make_abort_violation() This patch fixed this problem. This patch also fix two place which called sctp_sf_violation_paramlen() with wrong paramter type. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-09-18sctp: Fix oops when INIT-ACK indicates that peer doesn't support AUTHVlad Yasevich1-4/+2
If INIT-ACK is received with SupportedExtensions parameter which indicates that the peer does not support AUTH, the packet will be silently ignore, and sctp_process_init() do cleanup all of the transports in the association. When T1-Init timer is expires, OOPS happen while we try to choose a different init transport. The solution is to only clean up the non-active transports, i.e the ones that the peer added. However, that introduces a problem with sctp_connectx(), because we don't mark the proper state for the transports provided by the user. So, we'll simply mark user-provided transports as ACTIVE. That will allow INIT retransmissions to work properly in the sctp_connectx() context and prevent the crash. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-09-18sctp: do not enable peer features if we can't do them.Vlad Yasevich1-2/+7
Do not enable peer features like addip and auth, if they are administratively disabled localy. If the peer resports that he supports something that we don't, neither end can use it so enabling it is pointless. This solves a problem when talking to a peer that has auth and addip enabled while we do not. Found by Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <andrei@iptel.org>. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-07-18sctp: Support ipv6only AF_INET6 sockets.Vlad Yasevich1-1/+6
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-05-13sctp: Fix use of uninitialized pointerPatrick McHardy1-3/+3
Introduced by c4492586 (sctp: Add address type check while process paramaters of ASCONF chunk): net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c: In function 'sctp_process_asconf': net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:2828: warning: 'addr_param' may be used uninitialized in this function net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:2828: note: 'addr_param' was declared here Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-05-12sctp: Add address type check while process paramaters of ASCONF chunkWei Yongjun1-0/+13
If socket is create by AF_INET type, add IPv6 address to asoc will cause kernel panic while packet is transmitted on that transport. This patch add address type check before process paramaters of ASCONF chunk. If peer is not support this address type, return with error invald parameter. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-05-12sctp: Do not enable peer IPv6 address support on PF_INET socketWei Yongjun1-1/+2
If socket is create by PF_INET type, it can not used IPv6 address to send/recv DATA, So we can not used IPv6 address even if peer tell us it support IPv6 address. This patch fix to only enabled peer IPv6 address support on PF_INET6 socket. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-04-14Merge branch 'master' of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6David S. Miller1-3/+26
Conflicts: drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/Kconfig drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c net/ipv4/inet_timewait_sock.c net/ipv6/raw.c net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c
2008-04-12[SCTP]: "list_for_each()" -> "list_for_each_entry()" where appropriate.Robert P. J. Day1-6/+4
Replacing (almost) all invocations of list_for_each() with list_for_each_entry() tightens up the code and allows for the deletion of numerous list iterator variables that are no longer necessary. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-04-12[SCTP]: Add check for hmac_algo parameter in sctp_verify_param()Wei Yongjun1-3/+26
RFC 4890 has the following text: The HMAC algorithm based on SHA-1 MUST be supported and included in the HMAC-ALGO parameter. As a result, we need to check in sctp_verify_param() that HMAC_SHA1 is present in the list. If not, we should probably treat this as a protocol violation. It should also be a protocol violation if the HMAC parameter is empty. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-03-23[SCTP]: Replace char msg[] with static const char[].Florian Westphal1-1/+1
133886 2004 220 136110 213ae sctp.new/sctp.o 134018 2004 220 136242 21432 sctp.old/sctp.o Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-03-05SCTP: Fix chunk parameter processing bugGui Jianfeng1-0/+8
If an address family is not listed in "Supported Address Types" parameter(INIT Chunk), but the packet is sent by that family, this address family should be considered as supported by peer. Otherwise, an error condition will occur. For instance, if kernel receives an IPV6 SCTP INIT chunk with "Support Address Types" parameter which indicates just supporting IPV4 Address family. Kernel will reply an IPV6 SCTP INIT ACK packet, but the source ipv6 address in ipv6 header will be vacant. This is not correct. refer to RFC4460 as following: IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: If an SCTP endpoint lists in the 'Supported Address Types' parameter either IPv4 or IPv6, but uses the other family for sending the packet containing the INIT chunk, or if it also lists addresses of the other family in the INIT chunk, then the address family that is not listed in the 'Supported Address Types' parameter SHOULD also be considered as supported by the receiver of the INIT chunk. The receiver of the INIT chunk SHOULD NOT respond with any kind of error indication. Here is a fix to comply to RFC. Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-02-06[SCTP]: Make sure the chunk is off the transmitted list prior to freeing.Vlad Yasevich1-0/+1
In a few instances, we need to remove the chunk from the transmitted list prior to freeing it. This is because the free code doesn't do that any more and so we need to do it manually. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2008-02-05[SCTP]: Stop claiming that this is a "reference implementation"Vlad Yasevich1-4/+4
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be "the reference implementation". First of all, "the refrence implementation" was the original implementation of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others. Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation', we don't really meet the requirements. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2008-01-31[SCTP]: Fix miss of report unrecognized HMAC Algorithm parameterWei Yongjun1-1/+1
This patch fix miss of check for report unrecognized HMAC Algorithm parameter. When AUTH is disabled, goto fall through path to report unrecognized parameter, else, just break Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-01-28[SCTP]: Follow Add-IP security consideratiosn wrt INIT/INIT-ACKVlad Yasevich1-4/+43
The Security Considerations section of RFC 5061 has the following text: If an SCTP endpoint that supports this extension receives an INIT that indicates that the peer supports the ASCONF extension but does NOT support the [RFC4895] extension, the receiver of such an INIT MUST send an ABORT in response. Note that an implementation is allowed to silently discard such an INIT as an option as well, but under NO circumstance is an implementation allowed to proceed with the association setup by sending an INIT-ACK in response. An implementation that receives an INIT-ACK that indicates that the peer does not support the [RFC4895] extension MUST NOT send the COOKIE-ECHO to establish the association. Instead, the implementation MUST discard the INIT-ACK and report to the upper- layer user that an association cannot be established destroying the Transmission Control Block (TCB). Follow the recomendations. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-01-28[SCTP]: Change use_as_src into a full address stateVlad Yasevich1-3/+3
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-01-28[SCTP]: Update ASCONF processing to conform to spec.Vlad Yasevich1-7/+5
The processing of the ASCONF chunks has changed a lot in the spec. New items are: 1. A list of ASCONF-ACK chunks is now cached 2. The source of the packet is used in response. 3. New handling for unexpect ASCONF chunks. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-01-28[SCTP]: Add the handling of "Set Primary IP Address" parameter to INITVlad Yasevich1-0/+27
The ADD-IP "Set Primary IP Address" parameter is allowed in the INIT/INIT-ACK exchange. Allow processing of this parameter during the INIT/INIT-ACK. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-01-28[SCTP]: Handle the wildcard ADD-IP Address parameterVlad Yasevich1-4/+36
The Address Parameter in the parameter list of the ASCONF chunk may be a wildcard address. In this case special processing is required. For the 'add' case, the source IP of the packet is added. In the 'del' case, all addresses except the source IP of packet are removed. In the "mark primary" case, the source address is marked as primary. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-01-08[SCTP]: Add back the code that accounted for FORWARD_TSN parameter in INIT.Vlad Yasevich1-0/+6
Some recent changes completely removed accounting for the FORWARD_TSN parameter length in the INIT and INIT-ACK chunk. This is wrong and should be restored. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-12-20[SCTP]: Spelling fixesJoe Perches1-4/+4
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-11-29SCTP: Fix the supported extensions paramterVlad Yasevich1-15/+8
Supported extensions parameter was not coded right and ended up over-writing memory or causing skb overflows. First, remove the FWD_TSN support from as it shouldn't be there and also fix the paramter encoding. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2007-11-29SCTP: Fix SCTP-AUTH to correctly add HMACS paramter.Vlad Yasevich1-1/+1
There was a typo that cleared the HMACS parameters when no authenticated chunks were specified. We whould be clearing the chunks pointer instead of the hmacs. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2007-11-09SCTP: Make sctp_verify_param return multiple indications.Vlad Yasevich1-74/+75
SCTP-AUTH and future ADD-IP updates have a requirement to do additional verification of parameters and an ability to ABORT the association if verification fails. So, introduce additional return code so that we can clear signal a required action. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2007-11-07SCTP: Allow ADD_IP to work with AUTH for backward compatibility.Vlad Yasevich1-1/+3
This patch adds a tunable that will allow ADD_IP to work without AUTH for backward compatibility. The default value is off since the default value for ADD_IP is off as well. People who need to use ADD-IP with older implementations take risks of connection hijacking and should consider upgrading or turning this tunable on. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2007-11-07SCTP: Correctly disable ADD-IP when AUTH is not supported.Vlad Yasevich1-2/+3
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2007-11-07SCTP: Update RCU handling during the ADD-IP caseVlad Yasevich1-1/+5
After learning more about rcu, it looks like the ADD-IP hadling doesn't need to call call_rcu_bh. All the rcu critical sections use rcu_read_lock, so using call_rcu_bh is wrong here. Now, restore the local_bh_disable() code blocks and use normal call_rcu() calls. Also restore the missing return statement. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2007-11-07SCTP : Fix to process bundled ASCONF chunk correctlyWei Yongjun1-2/+6
If ASCONF chunk is bundled with other chunks as the first chunk, when process the ASCONF parameters, full packet data will be process as the parameters of the ASCONF chunk, not only the real parameters. So if you send a ASCONF chunk bundled with other chunks, you will get an unexpect result. This problem also exists when ASCONF-ACK chunk is bundled with other chunks. This patch fix this problem. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
2007-10-27[CRYPTO] users: Fix up scatterlist conversion errorsHerbert Xu1-4/+2
This patch fixes the errors made in the users of the crypto layer during the sg_init_table conversion. It also adds a few conversions that were missing altogether. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-24SG: Change sg_set_page() to take length and offset argumentJens Axboe1-6/+2
Most drivers need to set length and offset as well, so may as well fold those three lines into one. Add sg_assign_page() for those two locations that only needed to set the page, where the offset/length is set outside of the function context. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2007-10-23Fix sctp compileChristian Borntraeger1-1/+1
sctp fails to compile with net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c: In function 'sctp_pack_cookie': net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1516: error: implicit declaration of function 'sg_init_table' net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1517: error: implicit declaration of function 'sg_set_page' use the proper include file. SCTP maintainers Vlad Yasevich and Sridhar Samudrala are CCed. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2007-10-22Update net/ to use sg helpersJens Axboe1-2/+4
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
2007-10-10[SCTP]: Tie ADD-IP and AUTH functionality as required by spec.Vlad Yasevich1-1/+12
ADD-IP spec requires AUTH. It is, in fact, dangerous without AUTH. So, disable ADD-IP functionality if the peer claims to support ADD-IP, but not AUTH. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[SCTP]: Enable the sending of the AUTH chunk.Vlad Yasevich1-0/+39
SCTP-AUTH, Section 6.2: Endpoints MUST send all requested chunks authenticated where this has been requested by the peer. The other chunks MAY be sent authenticated or not. If endpoint pair shared keys are used, one of them MUST be selected for authentication. To send chunks in an authenticated way, the sender MUST include these chunks after an AUTH chunk. This means that a sender MUST bundle chunks in order to authenticate them. If the endpoint has no endpoint pair shared key for the peer, it MUST use Shared Key Identifier 0 with an empty endpoint pair shared key. If there are multiple endpoint shared keys the sender selects one and uses the corresponding Shared Key Identifier Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[SCTP]: Implete SCTP-AUTH parameter processingVlad Yasevich1-3/+159
Implement processing for the CHUNKS, RANDOM, and HMAC parameters and deal with how this parameters are effected by association restarts. In particular, during unexpeted INIT processing, we need to reply with parameters from the original INIT chunk. Also, after restart, we need to update the old association with new peer parameters and change the association shared keys. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-10[SCTP]: Implement the Supported Extensions ParameterVlad Yasevich1-2/+89
SCTP Supported Extenions parameter is specified in Section 4.2.7 of the ADD-IP draft (soon to be RFC). The parameter is encoded as: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Parameter Type = 0x8008 | Parameter Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | CHUNK TYPE 1 | CHUNK TYPE 2 | CHUNK TYPE 3 | CHUNK TYPE 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | .... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | CHUNK TYPE N | PAD | PAD | PAD | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ It contains a list of chunks that a particular SCTP extension uses. Current extensions supported are Partial Reliability (FWD-TSN) and ADD-IP (ASCONF and ASCONF-ACK). When implementing new extensions (AUTH, PKT-DROP, etc..), new chunks need to be added to this parameter. Parameter processing would be modified to negotiate support for these new features. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>