| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Add the necessary definitions for building bpf samples on ppc.
Since ppc doesn't store function return address on the stack, modify how
PT_REGS_RET() and PT_REGS_FP() work.
Also, introduce PT_REGS_IP() to access the instruction pointer.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
increase stress by also calling bpf_get_stackid() from
various *spin* functions
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
this test calls bpf programs from different contexts:
from inside of slub, from rcu, from pretty much everywhere,
since it kprobes all spin_lock functions.
It stresses the bpf hash and percpu map pre-allocation,
deallocation logic and call_rcu mechanisms.
User space part adding more stress by walking and deleting map elements.
Note that due to nature bpf_load.c the earlier kprobe+bpf programs are
already active while loader loads new programs, creates new kprobes and
attaches them.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
Naveen N. Rao
Alexei Starovoitov