aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scripts/kconfig/tests (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-03-26kconfig: tests: test if recursive inclusion is detectedMasahiro Yamada6-0/+24
If recursive inclusion is detected, it should fail with error messages. Test this. This also tests the line numbers in the error message, fixed by commit 5ae6fcc4bb82 ("kconfig: fix line number in recursive inclusion error message"). Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
2018-03-26kconfig: tests: test if recursive dependencies are detectedMasahiro Yamada3-0/+101
Recursive dependency should be detected and warned. Test this. This indirectly tests the line number increments. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
2018-03-26kconfig: tests: test randconfig for choice in choiceMasahiro Yamada5-0/+60
Commit 3b9a19e08960 ("kconfig: loop as long as we changed some symbols in randconfig") fixed randconfig where a choice contains a sub-choice. Prior to that commit, the sub-choice values were not set. I am not sure whether this is an intended feature or just something people discovered works, but it is used in the real world; drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/Kconfig is source'd in a choice context, then creates a sub-choice in it. For the test case in this commit, there are 3 possible results. Case 1: CONFIG_A=y # CONFIG_B is not set Case 2: # CONFIG_A is not set CONFIG_B=y CONFIG_C=y # CONFIG_D is not set Case 3: # CONFIG_A is not set CONFIG_B=y # CONFIG_C is not set CONFIG_D=y CONFIG_E=y So, this test iterates several times, and checks if the result is either of the three. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
2018-03-26kconfig: tests: test defconfig when two choices interactMasahiro Yamada4-0/+42
Commit fbe98bb9ed3d ("kconfig: Fix defconfig when one choice menu selects options that another choice menu depends on") fixed defconfig when two choices interact (i.e. calculating the visibility of a choice requires to calculate another choice). The test code in that commit log was based on the real world example, and complicated. So, I shrunk it down to the following: defconfig.choice: ---8<--- CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=y ---8<--- ---8<--- config MODULES def_bool y option modules choice prompt "Choice" config CHOICE_VAL0 tristate "Choice 0" config CHOICE_VAL1 tristate "Choice 1" endchoice choice prompt "Another choice" depends on CHOICE_VAL0 config DUMMY bool "dummy" endchoice ---8<--- Prior to commit fbe98bb9ed3d, $ scripts/kconfig/conf --defconfig=defconfig.choice Kconfig.choice resulted in: CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=m # CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL1 is not set CONFIG_DUMMY=y where the expected result would be: CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL0=y # CONFIG_CHOICE_VAL1 is not set CONFIG_DUMMY=y Roughly, this weird behavior happened like this: Symbols are calculated a couple of times. First, all symbols are calculated in conf_read(). The first 'choice' is evaluated to 'y' due to the SYMBOL_DEF_USER flag, but sym_calc_choice() clears it unless all of its choice values are explicitly set by the user. conf_set_all_new_symbols() clears all SYMBOL_VALID flags. Then, only choices are calculated. Here, the SYMBOL_DEF_USER for the first choice has been forgotten, so it is evaluated to 'm'. set_all_choice_values() sets SYMBOL_DEF_USER again to choice symbols. When calculating the second choice, due to 'depends on CHOICE_VAL0', it triggers the calculation of CHOICE_VAL0. As a result, SYMBOL_VALID is set for CHOICE_VAL0. Symbols except choices get the final chance of re-calculation in conf_write(). In a normal case, CHOICE_VAL0 would be re-calculated, then the first choice would be indirectly re-calculated with the SYMBOL_DEF_USER which has been recalled by set_all_choice_values(), which would be evaluated to 'y'. But, in this case, CHOICE_VAL0 has already been marked as SYMBOL_VALID, so this re-calculation does not happen. Then, =m from the conf_set_all_new_symbols() phase is written out to the .config file. Add a unit test for this naive case. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
2018-03-26kconfig: tests: check visibility of tristate choice values in y choiceMasahiro Yamada5-0/+43
If tristate choice values depend on symbols set to 'm', they should be hidden when the choice containing them is changed from 'm' to 'y' (i.e. exclusive choice). This issue was fixed by commit fa64e5f6a35e ("kconfig/symbol.c: handle choice_values that depend on 'm' symbols"). Add a test case to avoid regression. For the input in this unit test, there is a room for argument if "# CONFIG_CHOICE1 is not set" should be written to the .config file. After commit fa64e5f6a35e, this line was written to the .config file. With commit cb67ab2cd2b8 ("kconfig: do not write choice values when their dependency becomes n"), it is not written now. In this test, "# CONFIG_CHOICE1 is not set" is don't care. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
2018-03-26kconfig: tests: check unneeded "is not set" with unmet dependencyMasahiro Yamada4-0/+39
Commit cb67ab2cd2b8 ("kconfig: do not write choice values when their dependency becomes n") fixed a problem where "# CONFIG_... is not set" for choice values are wrongly written into the .config file when they are once visible, then become invisible later. Add a test for this naive case. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
2018-03-26kconfig: tests: test if new symbols in choice are askedMasahiro Yamada4-0/+64
If new choice values are added with new dependency, and they become visible during user configuration, oldconfig should recognize them as (NEW), and ask the user for choice. This issue was fixed by commit 5d09598d488f ("kconfig: fix new choices being skipped upon config update"). This is a subtle corner case. Add a test case to avoid breakage. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
2018-03-26kconfig: tests: test automatic submenu creationMasahiro Yamada3-0/+72
If a symbols has dependency on the preceding symbol, the menu entry should become the submenu of the preceding one, and displayed with deeper indentation. This is done by restructuring the menu tree in menu_finalize(). It is a bit complicated computation, so let's add a test case. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
2018-03-26kconfig: tests: add basic choice testsMasahiro Yamada9-0/+149
The calculation of 'choice' is a bit complicated part in Kconfig. The behavior of 'y' choice is intuitive. If choice values are tristate, the choice can be 'm' where each value can be enabled independently. Also, if a choice is marked as 'optional', the whole choice can be invisible. Test basic functionality of choice. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>
2018-03-26kconfig: tests: add framework for Kconfig unit testingMasahiro Yamada2-0/+298
Many parts in Kconfig are so cryptic and need refactoring. However, its complexity prevents us from moving forward. There are several naive corner cases where it is difficult to notice breakage. If those are covered by unit tests, we will be able to touch the code with more confidence. Here is a simple test framework based on pytest. The conftest.py provides a fixture useful to run commands such as 'oldaskconfig' etc. and to compare the resulted .config, stdout, stderr with expectations. How to add test cases? ---------------------- For each test case, you should create a subdirectory under scripts/kconfig/tests/ (so test cases are separated from each other). Every test case directory should contain the following files: - __init__.py: describes test functions - Kconfig: the top level Kconfig file for the test To do a useful job, test cases generally need additional data like input .config and information about expected results. How to run tests? ----------------- You need python3 and pytest. Then, run "make testconfig". O= option is supported. If V=1 is given, detailed logs captured during tests are displayed. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>