Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
The MIPS %.its.S compiler command did not define __ASSEMBLY__, which meant
when compiler_types.h was added to kconfig.h, unexpected things appeared
(e.g. struct declarations) which should not have been present. As done in
the general %.S compiler command, __ASSEMBLY__ is now included here too.
The failure was:
Error: arch/mips/boot/vmlinux.gz.its:201.1-2 syntax error
FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
/usr/bin/mkimage: Can't read arch/mips/boot/vmlinux.gz.itb.tmp: Invalid argument
/usr/bin/mkimage Can't add hashes to FIT blob
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 28128c61e08e ("kconfig.h: Include compiler types to avoid missed struct attributes")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
I recently noticed a crash on arm64 when feeding a bogus index
into BPF tail call helper. The crash would not occur when the
interpreter is used, but only in case of JIT. Output looks as
follows:
[ 347.007486] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffb850e96492510
[...]
[ 347.043065] [fffb850e96492510] address between user and kernel address ranges
[ 347.050205] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
[...]
[ 347.190829] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
[ 347.196128] x11: fffc047ebe782800 x10: ffff808fd7d0fd10
[ 347.201427] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000
[ 347.206726] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 001c991738000000
[ 347.212025] x5 : 0000000000000018 x4 : 000000000000ba5a
[ 347.217325] x3 : 00000000000329c4 x2 : ffff808fd7cf0500
[ 347.222625] x1 : ffff808fd7d0fc00 x0 : ffff808fd7cf0500
[ 347.227926] Process test_verifier (pid: 4548, stack limit = 0x000000007467fa61)
[ 347.235221] Call trace:
[ 347.237656] 0xffff000002f3a4fc
[ 347.240784] bpf_test_run+0x78/0xf8
[ 347.244260] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x148/0x230
[ 347.248694] SyS_bpf+0x77c/0x1110
[ 347.251999] el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34
[ 347.255564] Code: 9100075a d280220a 8b0a002a d37df04b (f86b694b)
[...]
In this case the index used in BPF r3 is the same as in r1
at the time of the call, meaning we fed a pointer as index;
here, it had the value 0xffff808fd7cf0500 which sits in x2.
While I found tail calls to be working in general (also for
hitting the error cases), I noticed the following in the code
emission:
# bpftool p d j i 988
[...]
38: ldr w10, [x1,x10]
3c: cmp w2, w10
40: b.ge 0x000000000000007c <-- signed cmp
44: mov x10, #0x20 // #32
48: cmp x26, x10
4c: b.gt 0x000000000000007c
50: add x26, x26, #0x1
54: mov x10, #0x110 // #272
58: add x10, x1, x10
5c: lsl x11, x2, #3
60: ldr x11, [x10,x11] <-- faulting insn (f86b694b)
64: cbz x11, 0x000000000000007c
[...]
Meaning, the tests passed because commit ddb55992b04d ("arm64:
bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") was using signed compares
instead of unsigned which as a result had the test wrongly passing.
Change this but also the tail call count test both into unsigned
and cap the index as u32. Latter we did as well in 90caccdd8cc0
("bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT") and is needed in addition here,
too. Tested on HiSilicon Hi1616.
Result after patch:
# bpftool p d j i 268
[...]
38: ldr w10, [x1,x10]
3c: add w2, w2, #0x0
40: cmp w2, w10
44: b.cs 0x0000000000000080
48: mov x10, #0x20 // #32
4c: cmp x26, x10
50: b.hi 0x0000000000000080
54: add x26, x26, #0x1
58: mov x10, #0x110 // #272
5c: add x10, x1, x10
60: lsl x11, x2, #3
64: ldr x11, [x10,x11]
68: cbz x11, 0x0000000000000080
[...]
Fixes: ddb55992b04d ("arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Implement a retpoline [0] for the BPF tail call JIT'ing that converts
the indirect jump via jmp %rax that is used to make the long jump into
another JITed BPF image. Since this is subject to speculative execution,
we need to control the transient instruction sequence here as well
when CONFIG_RETPOLINE is set, and direct it into a pause + lfence loop.
The latter aligns also with what gcc / clang emits (e.g. [1]).
JIT dump after patch:
# bpftool p d x i 1
0: (18) r2 = map[id:1]
2: (b7) r3 = 0
3: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12
4: (b7) r0 = 2
5: (95) exit
With CONFIG_RETPOLINE:
# bpftool p d j i 1
[...]
33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi)
36: jbe 0x0000000000000072 |*
38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax
3e: cmp $0x20,%eax
41: ja 0x0000000000000072 |
43: add $0x1,%eax
46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp)
4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax
54: test %rax,%rax
57: je 0x0000000000000072 |
59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax
5d: add $0x25,%rax
61: callq 0x000000000000006d |+
66: pause |
68: lfence |
6b: jmp 0x0000000000000066 |
6d: mov %rax,(%rsp) |
71: retq |
72: mov $0x2,%eax
[...]
* relative fall-through jumps in error case
+ retpoline for indirect jump
Without CONFIG_RETPOLINE:
# bpftool p d j i 1
[...]
33: cmp %edx,0x24(%rsi)
36: jbe 0x0000000000000063 |*
38: mov 0x24(%rbp),%eax
3e: cmp $0x20,%eax
41: ja 0x0000000000000063 |
43: add $0x1,%eax
46: mov %eax,0x24(%rbp)
4c: mov 0x90(%rsi,%rdx,8),%rax
54: test %rax,%rax
57: je 0x0000000000000063 |
59: mov 0x28(%rax),%rax
5d: add $0x25,%rax
61: jmpq *%rax |-
63: mov $0x2,%eax
[...]
* relative fall-through jumps in error case
- plain indirect jump as before
[0] https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
[1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/a31e654fa107be968b802786d747e962c2fcdb2b
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Fix build error in fs/signalfd.c by using same method that is used in
kernel/signal.c: separate blocks for different signal si_code values.
./fs/signalfd.c: error: 'BUS_MCEERR_AR' undeclared (first use in this function)
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
|
|
All the kernel_sendmsg() calls in rxrpc_send_data_packet() need to send
both parts of the iov[] buffer, but one of them does not. Fix it so that
it does.
Without this, short IPv6 rxrpc DATA packets may be seen that have the rxrpc
header included, but no payload.
Fixes: 5a924b8951f8 ("rxrpc: Don't store the rxrpc header in the Tx queue sk_buffs")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Declaring a static function in a header leads to a warning every
time that header gets included without the function being used:
In file included from drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:42:
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/ptp.h:92:13: error: 'mv88e6xxx_hwtstamp_work' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
static long mv88e6xxx_hwtstamp_work(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp)
In file included from drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c:38:
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global2.h:355:12: error: 'mv88e6xxx_g2_wait' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
static int mv88e6xxx_g2_wait(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int reg, u16 mask)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global2.h:350:12: error: 'mv88e6xxx_g2_update' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
static int mv88e6xxx_g2_update(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int reg, u16 update)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global2.h:345:12: error: 'mv88e6xxx_g2_write' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
static int mv88e6xxx_g2_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int reg, u16 val)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global2.h:340:12: error: 'mv88e6xxx_g2_read' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
static int mv88e6xxx_g2_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int reg, u16 *val)
This marks all such functions in dsa inline to make sure we don't warn
about them.
Fixes: c6fe0ad2c349 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add rx/tx timestamping support")
Fixes: 0d632c3d6fe3 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add accessors for PTP/TAI registers")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
We should check "self->aq_hw" for allocation failure, and also we should
free it on the error paths.
Fixes: 23ee07ad3c2f ("net: aquantia: Cleanup pci functions module")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Commit 9a3efb6b661f ("bpf: fix memory leak in lpm_trie map_free callback function")
fixed a memory leak and removed unnecessary locks in map_free callback function.
Unfortrunately, it introduced a lockdep warning. When lockdep checking is turned on,
running tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map will have:
[ 98.294321] =============================
[ 98.294807] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[ 98.295359] 4.16.0-rc2+ #193 Not tainted
[ 98.295907] -----------------------------
[ 98.296486] /home/yhs/work/bpf/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:572 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[ 98.297657]
[ 98.297657] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 98.297657]
[ 98.298663]
[ 98.298663] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
[ 98.299536] 2 locks held by kworker/2:1/54:
[ 98.300152] #0: ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}, at: [<00000000196bc1f0>] process_one_work+0x157/0x5c0
[ 98.301381] #1: ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: [<00000000196bc1f0>] process_one_work+0x157/0x5c0
Since actual trie tree removal happens only after no other
accesses to the tree are possible, replacing
rcu_dereference_protected(*slot, lockdep_is_held(&trie->lock))
with
rcu_dereference_protected(*slot, 1)
fixed the issue.
Fixes: 9a3efb6b661f ("bpf: fix memory leak in lpm_trie map_free callback function")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
syszbot managed to trigger RCU detected stalls in
bpf_array_free_percpu()
It takes time to allocate a huge percpu map, but even more time to free
it.
Since we run in process context, use cond_resched() to yield cpu if
needed.
Fixes: a10423b87a7e ("bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY map")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
|
|
The AMDA0099-0001 platform can support the 1x10G + 1x25G mixed mode
operation. Recently, firmware has been added for this configuration
mode.
Signed-off-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|