Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Adds VIN, decoder and connector.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
|
|
Add device tree source for Renesas GR-Peach board.
GR-Peach is an RZ/A1H based board with 10MB of on-chip SRAM and 8MB
QSPI flash storage.
Add support for the board, and create a 2MB partition to use as rootfs.
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
|
|
Identical to the setup on Koelsch.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
|
|
The aa104xd12 and aa121td01 panels are LVDS panels, not DPI panels.
Use the correct DT bindings.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
|
|
Add the "1v8" pinctrl state and sd-uhs-sdr50 property to SDHI{0,1,2}.
And the sd-uhs-sdr104 property to SDHI0.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
|
|
Define the upper limit otherwise the driver cannot utilize max speeds.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
|
|
Add node for the GyroADC block and it's associated clock.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
|
|
This adds the USB0 and USB1 clocks to the device tree.
Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc@e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6050000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc@e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6060000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc@e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6060000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc@e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6060000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from fffc0000.pfc and pfc@fffc0000 to
fffc0000.pin-controller and pin-controller@fffc0000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from fffc0000.pfc and pfc@fffc0000 to
fffc0000.pin-controller and pin-controller@fffc0000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc@e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6050000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc@e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6050000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e0140200.pfc and pfc@e0140200 to
e0140200.pin-controller and pin-controller@e0140200.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
Add the bit locations that correspond to the USB clocks.
Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
|