| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc@e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6060000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc@e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6060000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc@e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6060000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from fffc0000.pfc and pfc@fffc0000 to
fffc0000.pin-controller and pin-controller@fffc0000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from fffc0000.pfc and pfc@fffc0000 to
fffc0000.pin-controller and pin-controller@fffc0000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc@e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6050000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc@e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller@e6050000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e0140200.pfc and pfc@e0140200 to
e0140200.pin-controller and pin-controller@e0140200.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
|
|
Add the bit locations that correspond to the USB clocks.
Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
|