| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Fix the following warnings (Building: rpc_defconfig arm):
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_disconnect_intr’:
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:913:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (fas216_get_last_msg(info, info->scsi.msgin_fifo) == ABORT) {
^
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:919:2: note: here
default: /* huh? */
^~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_kick’:
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1959:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fas216_allocate_tag(info, SCpnt);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1960:2: note: here
case TYPE_OTHER:
^~~~
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_busservice_intr’:
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1413:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fas216_stoptransfer(info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1414:2: note: here
case STATE(STAT_STATUS, PHASE_SELSTEPS):/* Sel w/ steps -> Status */
^~~~
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1424:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
fas216_stoptransfer(info);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1425:2: note: here
case STATE(STAT_MESGIN, PHASE_COMMAND): /* Command -> Message In */
^~~~
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_funcdone_intr’:
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1573:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if ((stat & STAT_BUSMASK) == STAT_MESGIN) {
^
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1579:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_handlesync’:
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:605:20: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
info->scsi.phase = PHASE_MSGOUT_EXPECT;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:607:2: note: here
case async:
^~~~
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: db1xxx_defconfig mips):
drivers/pcmcia/db1xxx_ss.c:257:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/pcmcia/db1xxx_ss.c:269:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning (Building: omap1_defconfig arm):
drivers/watchdog/wdt285.c:170:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/watchdog/ar7_wdt.c:237:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:449:23: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1549:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1547:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1545:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1543:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1540:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1538:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1535:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: sparc64):
drivers/watchdog/riowd.c: In function ‘riowd_ioctl’:
drivers/watchdog/riowd.c:136:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
riowd_writereg(p, riowd_timeout, WDTO_INDEX);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/watchdog/riowd.c:139:2: note: here
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
^~~~
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: s390):
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c: In function ‘ctcmpc_chx_attnbusy’:
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c:1703:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (grp->changed_side == 1) {
^
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c:1707:2: note: here
case MPCG_STATE_XID0IOWAIX:
^~~~
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c: In function ‘ctc_mpc_alloc_channel’:
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:358:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (callback)
^
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:360:2: note: here
case MPCG_STATE_XID0IOWAIT:
^~~~
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c: In function ‘mpc_action_timeout’:
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:1469:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if ((fsm_getstate(rch->fsm) == CH_XID0_PENDING) &&
^
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:1472:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c: In function ‘mpc_send_qllc_discontact’:
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:2087:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (grp->estconnfunc) {
^
drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:2092:2: note: here
case MPCG_STATE_FLOWC:
^~~~
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c: In function ‘qeth_l2_process_inbound_buffer’:
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c:328:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (IS_OSN(card)) {
^
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c:337:3: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm):
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c: In function ‘cryp_save_device_context’:
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:316:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
ctx->key_4_r = readl_relaxed(&src_reg->key_4_r);
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:318:2: note: here
case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_192:
^~~~
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:320:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
ctx->key_3_r = readl_relaxed(&src_reg->key_3_r);
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:322:2: note: here
case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_128:
^~~~
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:324:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
ctx->key_2_r = readl_relaxed(&src_reg->key_2_r);
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:326:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/io.h:13:0,
from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp_p.h:14,
from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:15:
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c: In function ‘cryp_restore_device_context’:
./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:92:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
#define __raw_writel __raw_writel
^
./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:299:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’
#define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c)
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:363:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘writel_relaxed’
writel_relaxed(ctx->key_4_r, ®->key_4_r);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:365:2: note: here
case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_192:
^~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/io.h:13:0,
from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp_p.h:14,
from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:15:
./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:92:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
#define __raw_writel __raw_writel
^
./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:299:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’
#define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c)
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:367:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘writel_relaxed’
writel_relaxed(ctx->key_3_r, ®->key_3_r);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:369:2: note: here
case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_128:
^~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/io.h:13:0,
from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp_p.h:14,
from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:15:
./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:92:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
#define __raw_writel __raw_writel
^
./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:299:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’
#define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c)
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:371:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘writel_relaxed’
writel_relaxed(ctx->key_2_r, ®->key_2_r);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:373:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm):
drivers/watchdog/wdt977.c: In function ‘wdt977_ioctl’:
LD [M] drivers/media/platform/vicodec/vicodec.o
drivers/watchdog/wdt977.c:400:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
wdt977_keepalive();
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/watchdog/wdt977.c:403:2: note: here
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
^~~~
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning (Building: i386):
drivers/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c: In function ‘scx200_wdt_ioctl’:
drivers/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c:188:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
scx200_wdt_ping();
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c:189:2: note: here
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
^~~~
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
drivers/watchdog/ar7_wdt.c: warning: this statement may fall
through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 237:3
drivers/watchdog/pcwd.c: warning: this statement may fall
through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 653:3
drivers/watchdog/sb_wdog.c: warning: this statement may fall
through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 204:3
drivers/watchdog/wdt.c: warning: this statement may fall
through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 391:3
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c: In function 'do_signal':
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:598:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
restart -= 2;
~~~~~~~~^~~~
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:599:3: note: here
case -ERESTARTNOHAND:
^~~~
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c: In function 'usbhs_runtime_resume':
drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:303:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (!IS_ERR(omap->hsic480m_clk[i])) {
^
drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:313:3: note: here
case OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_TLL:
^~~~
drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c: In function 'usbhs_runtime_suspend':
drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:345:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (!IS_ERR(omap->hsic480m_clk[i]))
^
drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:349:3: note: here
case OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_TLL:
^~~~
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c: In function 'dsiclk_rate':
drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1592:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
div *= 2;
~~~~^~~~
drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1593:2: note: here
case PRCM_DSI_PLLOUT_SEL_PHI_2:
^~~~
drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1594:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
div *= 2;
~~~~^~~~
drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1595:2: note: here
case PRCM_DSI_PLLOUT_SEL_PHI:
^~~~
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c: In function 'omap_set_dma_src_burst_mode':
arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:384:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (dma_omap2plus()) {
^
arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:393:2: note: here
case OMAP_DMA_DATA_BURST_16:
^~~~
arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:394:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (dma_omap2plus()) {
^
arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:402:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c: In function 'omap_set_dma_dest_burst_mode':
arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:473:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (dma_omap2plus()) {
^
arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:481:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is
modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
arch/arm/mm/alignment.c: In function 'thumb2arm':
arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:688:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if ((tinstr & (3 << 9)) == 0x0400) {
^
arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:700:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
arch/arm/mm/alignment.c: In function 'do_alignment_t32_to_handler':
arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:753:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
poffset->un = (tinst2 & 0xff) << 2;
~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:754:2: note: here
case 0xe940:
^~~~
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c: In function 'tegra_cpu_reset_handler_enable':
arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c:72:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set(reset_address);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c:74:2: note: here
case 0:
^~~~
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'hw_breakpoint_arch_parse':
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:609:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (hw->ctrl.len == ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2)
^
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:611:2: note: here
case 3:
^~~~
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:613:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (hw->ctrl.len == ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1)
^
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:615:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'arch_build_bp_info':
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:544:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if ((hw->ctrl.type != ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE)
^
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:547:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:11,
from include/linux/list.h:9,
from include/linux/preempt.h:11,
from include/linux/hardirq.h:5,
from arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:16:
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'hw_breakpoint_pending':
include/linux/compiler.h:78:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
# define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/asm-generic/bug.h:136:2: note: in expansion of macro 'unlikely'
unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
^~~~~~~~
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:863:3: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN'
WARN(1, "Asynchronous watchpoint exception taken. Debugging results may be unreliable\n");
^~~~
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:864:2: note: here
case ARM_ENTRY_SYNC_WATCHPOINT:
^~~~
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'core_has_os_save_restore':
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:910:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
if (oslsr & ARM_OSLSR_OSLM0)
^
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:912:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
|
|
Since commit ff9b45c55b26 ("kbuild: modpost: read modules.order instead
of $(MODVERDIR)/*.mod"), a module is no longer built in the following
pattern:
[Makefile]
subdir-y := some-module
[some-module/Makefile]
obj-m := some-module.o
You cannot write Makefile this way in upstream because modules.order is
not correctly generated. subdir-y is used to descend to a sub-directory
that builds tools, device trees, etc.
For external modules, the modules order does not matter. So, the
Makefile above was known to work.
I believe the Makefile should be re-written as follows:
[Makefile]
obj-m := some-module/
[some-module/Makefile]
obj-m := some-module.o
However, people will have no idea if their Makefile suddenly stops
working. In fact, I received questions from multiple people.
Show a warning for a while if obj-m is specified in a Makefile visited
by subdir-y or subdir-m.
I touched the %/ rule to avoid false-positive warnings for the single
target.
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Tom Stonecypher <thomas.edwardx.stonecypher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Tested-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
|
|
The modules.order files in directories visited by the chain of obj-y
or obj-m are merged to the upper-level ones, and become parts of the
top-level modules.order. On the other hand, there is no need to
generate modules.order in directories visited by subdir-y or subdir-m
since they would become orphan anyway.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The current implementation of need-builtin is false-positive,
for example, in the following Makefile:
obj-m := foo/
obj-y := foo/bar/
..., where foo/built-in.a is not required.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
I removed the single target %.ko in commit ff9b45c55b26 ("kbuild:
modpost: read modules.order instead of $(MODVERDIR)/*.mod") because
the modpost stage does not work reliably. For instance, the module
dependency, modversion, etc. do not work if we lack symbol information
from the other modules.
Yet, some people still want to build only one module in their interest,
and it may be still useful if it is used within those limitations.
Fixes: ff9b45c55b26 ("kbuild: modpost: read modules.order instead of $(MODVERDIR)/*.mod")
Reported-by: Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>
Reported-by: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Masahiro Yamada