aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/export-to-postgresql.py (unfollow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-08-25KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Remove spurious semicolonsMarc Zyngier1-1/+1
Detected by Coccinelle (and Will Deacon) using scripts/coccinelle/misc/semicolon.cocci. Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: Call kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking early into the blocking sequenceMarc Zyngier1-4/+3
When a vpcu is about to block by calling kvm_vcpu_block, we call back into the arch code to allow any form of synchronization that may be required at this point (SVN stops the AVIC, ARM synchronises the VMCR and enables GICv4 doorbells). But this synchronization comes in quite late, as we've potentially waited for halt_poll_ns to expire. Instead, let's move kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking() to the beginning of kvm_vcpu_block(), which on ARM has several benefits: - VMCR gets synchronised early, meaning that any interrupt delivered during the polling window will be evaluated with the correct guest PMR - GICv4 doorbells are enabled, which means that any guest interrupt directly injected during that window will be immediately recognised Tang Nianyao ran some tests on a GICv4 machine to evaluate such change, and reported up to a 10% improvement for netperf: <quote> netperf result: D06 as server, intel 8180 server as client with change: package 512 bytes - 5500 Mbits/s package 64 bytes - 760 Mbits/s without change: package 512 bytes - 5000 Mbits/s package 64 bytes - 710 Mbits/s </quote> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Make function comments match function declarationsAlexandru Elisei2-6/+8
Since commit 503a62862e8f ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Rely on the GIC driver to parse the firmware tables"), the vgic_v{2,3}_probe functions stopped using a DT node. Commit 909777324588 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: vgic_init: implement kvm_vgic_hyp_init") changed the functions again, and now they require exactly one argument, a struct gic_kvm_info populated by the GIC driver. Unfortunately the comments regressed and state that a DT node is used instead. Change the function comments to reflect the current prototypes. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18arm64/kvm: Remove VMID rollover I-cache maintenanceMark Rutland1-1/+13
For VPIPT I-caches, we need I-cache maintenance on VMID rollover to avoid an ABA problem. Consider a single vCPU VM, with a pinned stage-2, running with an idmap VA->IPA and idmap IPA->PA. If we don't do maintenance on rollover: // VMID A Writes insn X to PA 0xF Invalidates PA 0xF (for VMID A) I$ contains [{A,F}->X] [VMID ROLLOVER] // VMID B Writes insn Y to PA 0xF Invalidates PA 0xF (for VMID B) I$ contains [{A,F}->X, {B,F}->Y] [VMID ROLLOVER] // VMID A I$ contains [{A,F}->X, {B,F}->Y] Unexpectedly hits stale I$ line {A,F}->X. However, for PIPT and VIPT I-caches, the VMID doesn't affect lookup or constrain maintenance. Given the VMID doesn't affect PIPT and VIPT I-caches, and given VMID rollover is independent of changes to stage-2 mappings, I-cache maintenance cannot be necessary on VMID rollover for PIPT or VIPT I-caches. This patch removes the maintenance on rollover for VIPT and PIPT I-caches. At the same time, the unnecessary colons are removed from the asm statement to make it more legible. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-irqfd: Implement kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomicMarc Zyngier1-6/+30
Now that we have a cache of MSI->LPI translations, it is pretty easy to implement kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic (this cache can be parsed without sleeping). Hopefully, this will improve some LPI-heavy workloads. Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check the LPI translation cache on MSI injectionMarc Zyngier2-0/+37
When performing an MSI injection, let's first check if the translation is already in the cache. If so, let's inject it quickly without going through the whole translation process. Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Cache successful MSI->LPI translationMarc Zyngier1-0/+86
On a successful translation, preserve the parameters in the LPI translation cache. Each translation is reusing the last slot in the list, naturally evicting the least recently used entry. Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on vgic teardownMarc Zyngier1-0/+2
In order to avoid leaking vgic_irq structures on teardown, we need to drop all references to LPIs before deallocating the cache itself. This is done by invalidating the cache on vgic teardown. Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on ITS disableMarc Zyngier1-0/+2
If an ITS gets disabled, we need to make sure that further interrupts won't hit in the cache. For that, we invalidate the translation cache when the ITS is disabled. Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on disabling LPIsMarc Zyngier1-1/+3
If a vcpu disables LPIs at its redistributor level, we need to make sure we won't pend more interrupts. For this, we need to invalidate the LPI translation cache. Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on specific commandsMarc Zyngier1-0/+9
The LPI translation cache needs to be discarded when an ITS command may affect the translation of an LPI (DISCARD, MAPC and MAPD with V=0) or the routing of an LPI to a redistributor with disabled LPIs (MOVI, MOVALL). We decide to perform a full invalidation of the cache, irrespective of the LPI that is affected. Commands are supposed to be rare enough that it doesn't matter. Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Add MSI-LPI translation cache invalidationMarc Zyngier2-0/+24
There's a number of cases where we need to invalidate the caching of translations, so let's add basic support for that. Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add __vgic_put_lpi_locked primitiveMarc Zyngier2-9/+18
Our LPI translation cache needs to be able to drop the refcount on an LPI whilst already holding the lpi_list_lock. Let's add a new primitive for this. Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-18KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add LPI translation cache definitionMarc Zyngier4-0/+59
Add the basic data structure that expresses an MSI to LPI translation as well as the allocation/release hooks. The size of the cache is arbitrarily defined as 16*nr_vcpus. Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2019-08-11Linux 5.3-rc4Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
2019-08-10Makefile: Convert -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 to just -Wimplicit-fallthrough for clangJoe Perches2-2/+2
A compilation -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning was enabled by commit a035d552a93b ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning") Even though clang 10.0.0 does not currently support this warning without a patch, clang currently does not support a value for this option. Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39382 The gcc default for this warning is 3 so removing the =3 has no effect for gcc and enables the warning for patched versions of clang. Also remove the =3 from an existing use in a parisc Makefile: arch/parisc/math-emu/Makefile Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-08-09ARM: ep93xx: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Fix the following warnings (Building: arm-ep93xx_defconfig arm): arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c: In function 'crunch_do': arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:46:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] memset(crunch_state, 0, sizeof(*crunch_state)); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:53:2: note: here case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT: ^~~~ Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09scsi: fas216: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+8
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Fix the following warnings (Building: rpc_defconfig arm): drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_disconnect_intr’: drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:913:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (fas216_get_last_msg(info, info->scsi.msgin_fifo) == ABORT) { ^ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:919:2: note: here default: /* huh? */ ^~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_kick’: drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1959:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fas216_allocate_tag(info, SCpnt); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1960:2: note: here case TYPE_OTHER: ^~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_busservice_intr’: drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1413:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fas216_stoptransfer(info); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1414:2: note: here case STATE(STAT_STATUS, PHASE_SELSTEPS):/* Sel w/ steps -> Status */ ^~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1424:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fas216_stoptransfer(info); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1425:2: note: here case STATE(STAT_MESGIN, PHASE_COMMAND): /* Command -> Message In */ ^~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_funcdone_intr’: drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1573:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if ((stat & STAT_BUSMASK) == STAT_MESGIN) { ^ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1579:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_handlesync’: drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:605:20: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] info->scsi.phase = PHASE_MSGOUT_EXPECT; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:607:2: note: here case async: ^~~~ Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09pcmcia: db1xxx_ss: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+4
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: db1xxx_defconfig mips): drivers/pcmcia/db1xxx_ss.c:257:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/pcmcia/db1xxx_ss.c:269:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09video: fbdev: omapfb_main: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+8
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning (Building: omap1_defconfig arm): drivers/watchdog/wdt285.c:170:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/watchdog/ar7_wdt.c:237:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:449:23: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1549:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1547:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1545:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1543:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1540:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1538:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1535:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09watchdog: riowd: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: sparc64): drivers/watchdog/riowd.c: In function ‘riowd_ioctl’: drivers/watchdog/riowd.c:136:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] riowd_writereg(p, riowd_timeout, WDTO_INDEX); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/watchdog/riowd.c:139:2: note: here case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT: ^~~~ Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09s390/net: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva3-1/+5
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: s390): drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c: In function ‘ctcmpc_chx_attnbusy’: drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c:1703:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (grp->changed_side == 1) { ^ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c:1707:2: note: here case MPCG_STATE_XID0IOWAIX: ^~~~ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c: In function ‘ctc_mpc_alloc_channel’: drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:358:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (callback) ^ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:360:2: note: here case MPCG_STATE_XID0IOWAIT: ^~~~ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c: In function ‘mpc_action_timeout’: drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:1469:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if ((fsm_getstate(rch->fsm) == CH_XID0_PENDING) && ^ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:1472:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c: In function ‘mpc_send_qllc_discontact’: drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:2087:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (grp->estconnfunc) { ^ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:2092:2: note: here case MPCG_STATE_FLOWC: ^~~~ drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c: In function ‘qeth_l2_process_inbound_buffer’: drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c:328:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (IS_OSN(card)) { ^ drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c:337:3: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09crypto: ux500/crypt: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+6
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm): drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c: In function ‘cryp_save_device_context’: drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:316:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] ctx->key_4_r = readl_relaxed(&src_reg->key_4_r); drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:318:2: note: here case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_192: ^~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:320:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] ctx->key_3_r = readl_relaxed(&src_reg->key_3_r); drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:322:2: note: here case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_128: ^~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:324:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] ctx->key_2_r = readl_relaxed(&src_reg->key_2_r); drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:326:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ In file included from ./include/linux/io.h:13:0, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp_p.h:14, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:15: drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c: In function ‘cryp_restore_device_context’: ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:92:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] #define __raw_writel __raw_writel ^ ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:299:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’ #define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:363:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘writel_relaxed’ writel_relaxed(ctx->key_4_r, &reg->key_4_r); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:365:2: note: here case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_192: ^~~~ In file included from ./include/linux/io.h:13:0, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp_p.h:14, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:15: ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:92:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] #define __raw_writel __raw_writel ^ ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:299:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’ #define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:367:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘writel_relaxed’ writel_relaxed(ctx->key_3_r, &reg->key_3_r); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:369:2: note: here case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_128: ^~~~ In file included from ./include/linux/io.h:13:0, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp_p.h:14, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:15: ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:92:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] #define __raw_writel __raw_writel ^ ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:299:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’ #define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:371:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘writel_relaxed’ writel_relaxed(ctx->key_2_r, &reg->key_2_r); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:373:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09watchdog: wdt977: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm): drivers/watchdog/wdt977.c: In function ‘wdt977_ioctl’: LD [M] drivers/media/platform/vicodec/vicodec.o drivers/watchdog/wdt977.c:400:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] wdt977_keepalive(); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/watchdog/wdt977.c:403:2: note: here case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT: ^~~~ Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09watchdog: scx200_wdt: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning (Building: i386): drivers/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c: In function ‘scx200_wdt_ioctl’: drivers/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c:188:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] scx200_wdt_ping(); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c:189:2: note: here case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT: ^~~~ Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09watchdog: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva4-2/+4
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: drivers/watchdog/ar7_wdt.c: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 237:3 drivers/watchdog/pcwd.c: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 653:3 drivers/watchdog/sb_wdog.c: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 204:3 drivers/watchdog/wdt.c: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 391:3 Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09ARM: signal: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning: arch/arm/kernel/signal.c: In function 'do_signal': arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:598:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] restart -= 2; ~~~~~~~~^~~~ arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:599:3: note: here case -ERESTARTNOHAND: ^~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09mfd: omap-usb-host: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-2/+2
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c: In function 'usbhs_runtime_resume': drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:303:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (!IS_ERR(omap->hsic480m_clk[i])) { ^ drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:313:3: note: here case OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_TLL: ^~~~ drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c: In function 'usbhs_runtime_suspend': drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:345:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (!IS_ERR(omap->hsic480m_clk[i])) ^ drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:349:3: note: here case OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_TLL: ^~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09mfd: db8500-prcmu: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+2
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c: In function 'dsiclk_rate': drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1592:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] div *= 2; ~~~~^~~~ drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1593:2: note: here case PRCM_DSI_PLLOUT_SEL_PHI_2: ^~~~ drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1594:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] div *= 2; ~~~~^~~~ drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1595:2: note: here case PRCM_DSI_PLLOUT_SEL_PHI: ^~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09ARM: OMAP: dma: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-9/+5
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c: In function 'omap_set_dma_src_burst_mode': arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:384:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (dma_omap2plus()) { ^ arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:393:2: note: here case OMAP_DMA_DATA_BURST_16: ^~~~ arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:394:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (dma_omap2plus()) { ^ arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:402:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c: In function 'omap_set_dma_dest_burst_mode': arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:473:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (dma_omap2plus()) { ^ arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:481:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09ARM: alignment: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+3
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: arch/arm/mm/alignment.c: In function 'thumb2arm': arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:688:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if ((tinstr & (3 << 9)) == 0x0400) { ^ arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:700:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ arch/arm/mm/alignment.c: In function 'do_alignment_t32_to_handler': arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:753:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] poffset->un = (tinst2 & 0xff) << 2; ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:754:2: note: here case 0xe940: ^~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09ARM: tegra: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning: arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c: In function 'tegra_cpu_reset_handler_enable': arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c:72:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set(reset_address); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c:74:2: note: here case 0: ^~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09ARM/hw_breakpoint: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+5
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'hw_breakpoint_arch_parse': arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:609:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (hw->ctrl.len == ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2) ^ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:611:2: note: here case 3: ^~~~ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:613:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (hw->ctrl.len == ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1) ^ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:615:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'arch_build_bp_info': arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:544:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if ((hw->ctrl.type != ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE) ^ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:547:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from include/linux/list.h:9, from include/linux/preempt.h:11, from include/linux/hardirq.h:5, from arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:16: arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'hw_breakpoint_pending': include/linux/compiler.h:78:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/asm-generic/bug.h:136:2: note: in expansion of macro 'unlikely' unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \ ^~~~~~~~ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:863:3: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN' WARN(1, "Asynchronous watchpoint exception taken. Debugging results may be unreliable\n"); ^~~~ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:864:2: note: here case ARM_ENTRY_SYNC_WATCHPOINT: ^~~~ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'core_has_os_save_restore': arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:910:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (oslsr & ARM_OSLSR_OSLM0) ^ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:912:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09mm/memremap: Fix reuse of pgmap instances with internal referencesDan Williams1-0/+6
Currently, attempts to shutdown and re-enable a device-dax instance trigger: Missing reference count teardown definition WARNING: CPU: 37 PID: 1608 at mm/memremap.c:211 devm_memremap_pages+0x234/0x850 [..] RIP: 0010:devm_memremap_pages+0x234/0x850 [..] Call Trace: dev_dax_probe+0x66/0x190 [device_dax] really_probe+0xef/0x390 driver_probe_device+0xb4/0x100 device_driver_attach+0x4f/0x60 Given that the setup path initializes pgmap->ref, arrange for it to be also torn down so devm_memremap_pages() is ready to be called again and not be mistaken for the 3rd-party per-cpu-ref case. Fixes: 24917f6b1041 ("memremap: provide an optional internal refcount in struct dev_pagemap") Reported-by: Fan Du <fan.du@intel.com> Tested-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/156530042781.2068700.8733813683117819799.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2019-08-09drm/i915: Remove redundant user_access_end() from __copy_from_user() error pathJosh Poimboeuf1-11/+9
Objtool reports: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable __copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC. Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/51a4155c5bc2ca847a9cbe85c1c11918bb193141.1564086017.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
2019-08-10kbuild: show hint if subdir-y/m is used to visit module MakefileMasahiro Yamada2-1/+8
Since commit ff9b45c55b26 ("kbuild: modpost: read modules.order instead of $(MODVERDIR)/*.mod"), a module is no longer built in the following pattern: [Makefile] subdir-y := some-module [some-module/Makefile] obj-m := some-module.o You cannot write Makefile this way in upstream because modules.order is not correctly generated. subdir-y is used to descend to a sub-directory that builds tools, device trees, etc. For external modules, the modules order does not matter. So, the Makefile above was known to work. I believe the Makefile should be re-written as follows: [Makefile] obj-m := some-module/ [some-module/Makefile] obj-m := some-module.o However, people will have no idea if their Makefile suddenly stops working. In fact, I received questions from multiple people. Show a warning for a while if obj-m is specified in a Makefile visited by subdir-y or subdir-m. I touched the %/ rule to avoid false-positive warnings for the single target. Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Cc: Tom Stonecypher <thomas.edwardx.stonecypher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Tested-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
2019-08-10kbuild: generate modules.order only in directories visited by obj-y/mMasahiro Yamada1-1/+2
The modules.order files in directories visited by the chain of obj-y or obj-m are merged to the upper-level ones, and become parts of the top-level modules.order. On the other hand, there is no need to generate modules.order in directories visited by subdir-y or subdir-m since they would become orphan anyway. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-08-10kbuild: fix false-positive need-builtin calculationMasahiro Yamada1-1/+2
The current implementation of need-builtin is false-positive, for example, in the following Makefile: obj-m := foo/ obj-y := foo/bar/ ..., where foo/built-in.a is not required. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-08-10kbuild: revive single target %.koMasahiro Yamada2-4/+13
I removed the single target %.ko in commit ff9b45c55b26 ("kbuild: modpost: read modules.order instead of $(MODVERDIR)/*.mod") because the modpost stage does not work reliably. For instance, the module dependency, modversion, etc. do not work if we lack symbol information from the other modules. Yet, some people still want to build only one module in their interest, and it may be still useful if it is used within those limitations. Fixes: ff9b45c55b26 ("kbuild: modpost: read modules.order instead of $(MODVERDIR)/*.mod") Reported-by: Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com> Reported-by: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-08-09gfs2: gfs2_walk_metadata fixAndreas Gruenbacher1-63/+101
It turns out that the current version of gfs2_metadata_walker suffers from multiple problems that can cause gfs2_hole_size to report an incorrect size. This will confuse fiemap as well as lseek with the SEEK_DATA flag. Fix that by changing gfs2_hole_walker to compute the metapath to the first data block after the hole (if any), and compute the hole size based on that. Fixes xfstest generic/490. Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18+