| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Active balance is triggered for a number of voluntary cases like misfit
or pinned tasks cases but also after that a number of load balance
attempts failed to migrate a task. There is no need to use active load
balance when the group is overloaded because an overloaded state means
that there is at least one waiting task. Nevertheless, the waiting task
is not selected and detached until the threshold becomes higher than its
load. This threshold increases with the number of failed lb (see the
condition if ((load >> env->sd->nr_balance_failed) > env->imbalance) in
detach_tasks()) and the waiting task will end up to be selected after a
number of attempts.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210107103325.30851-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
|
|
Setting LBF_ALL_PINNED during active load balance is only valid when there
is only 1 running task on the rq otherwise this ends up increasing the
balance interval whereas other tasks could migrate after the next interval
once they become cache-cold as an example.
LBF_ALL_PINNED flag is now always set it by default. It is then cleared
when we find one task that can be pulled when calling detach_tasks() or
during active migration.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210107103325.30851-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
|
|
Don't waste time checking whether an idle cfs_rq could be the busiest
queue. Furthermore, this can end up selecting a cfs_rq with a high load
but being idle in case of migrate_load.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210107103325.30851-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
|
|
CPU (root cfs_rq) estimated utilization (util_est) is currently used in
dequeue_task_fair() to drive frequency selection before it is updated.
with:
CPU_util : rq->cfs.avg.util_avg
CPU_util_est : rq->cfs.avg.util_est
CPU_utilization : max(CPU_util, CPU_util_est)
task_util : p->se.avg.util_avg
task_util_est : p->se.avg.util_est
dequeue_task_fair():
/* (1) CPU_util and task_util update + inform schedutil about
CPU_utilization changes */
for_each_sched_entity() /* 2 loops */
(dequeue_entity() ->) update_load_avg() -> cfs_rq_util_change()
-> cpufreq_update_util() ->...-> sugov_update_[shared\|single]
-> sugov_get_util() -> cpu_util_cfs()
/* (2) CPU_util_est and task_util_est update */
util_est_dequeue()
cpu_util_cfs() uses CPU_utilization which could lead to a false (too
high) utilization value for schedutil in task ramp-down or ramp-up
scenarios during task dequeue.
To mitigate the issue split the util_est update (2) into:
(A) CPU_util_est update in util_est_dequeue()
(B) task_util_est update in util_est_update()
Place (A) before (1) and keep (B) where (2) is. The latter is necessary
since (B) relies on task_util update in (1).
Fixes: 7f65ea42eb00 ("sched/fair: Add util_est on top of PELT")
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1608283672-18240-1-git-send-email-xuewen.yan94@gmail.com
|
Vincent Guittot
Xuewen Yan