| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Include SVE 2 and the various subfeatures it adds in the set of
hwcaps we check for.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220913141101.151400-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Clean up the output of the test by adding a missing newline, the fix had
been done locally but didn't make it into the applied version.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220913141101.151400-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
There are a couple of spelling mistakes of signame names. Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220907170902.687340-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Currently syscall-abi permits the bits in Z registers not shared with the
V registers as well as all of the predicate registers to be preserved on
syscall but the actual implementation has always cleared them and our
documentation has now been updated to make that the documented ABI so
update the syscall-abi test to match.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829162502.886816-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
The buffer used for verifying SVE Z registers allocated enough space for
16 maximally sized registers rather than 32 due to using the macro for the
number of P registers. In practice this didn't matter since for historical
reasons the maximum VQ defined in the ABI is greater the architectural
maximum so we will always allocate more space than is needed even with
emulated platforms implementing the architectural maximum. Still, we should
use the right define.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829162502.886816-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Now that the core utilities for signal testing support handling data in
EXTRA_CONTEXT blocks we can test larger SVE and SME VLs which spill over
the limits in the base signal context. This is done by defining storage
for the context as a union with a ucontext_t and a buffer together with
some helpers for getting relevant sizes and offsets like we do for
fake_sigframe, this isn't the most lovely code ever but is fairly
straightforward to implement and much less invasive to the somewhat
unclear and indistinct layers of abstraction in the signal handling test
code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-11-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
In order to allow testing of signal contexts that overflow the base signal
frame allow callers to pass the buffer size for the user context into
get_signal_context(). No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-10-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
When preserving the signal context for later verification by testcases
check for and include any EXTRA_CONTEXT block if enough space has been
provided.
Since the EXTRA_CONTEXT block includes a pointer to the start of the
additional data block we need to do at least some fixup on the copied
data. For simplicity in users we do this by extending the length of
the EXTRA_CONTEXT to include the following termination record, this
will cause users to see the extra data as part of the linked list of
contexts without needing any special handling. Care will be needed if
any specific tests for EXTRA_CONTEXT are added beyond the validation
done in ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-9-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Currently in validate_reserved() we check the basic form and contents of
an EXTRA_CONTEXT block but do not actually validate anything inside the
data block it provides. Extend the validation to do so, when we get to the
terminator for the main data block reset and start walking the extra data
block instead.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-8-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Currently for the more complex signal context types we validate the context
specific details the end of the parsing loop validate_reserved() if we've
ever seen a context of that type. This is currently merely a bit inefficient
but will get a bit awkward when we start parsing extra_context, at which
point we will need to reset the head to advance into the extra space that
extra_context provides. Instead only do the more detailed checks on each
context type the first time we see that context type.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-7-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Nothing outside testcases.c should need to use validate_extra_context(),
remove the prototype to ensure nothing does.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-6-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
Currently in validate_extra_context() we assert both that the extra data
pointed to by the EXTRA_CONTEXT is 16 byte aligned and that it immediately
follows the struct _aarch64_ctx providing the terminator for the linked
list of contexts in the signal frame. Since struct _aarch64_ctx is an 8
byte structure which must be 16 byte aligned these cannot both be true. As
documented in sigcontext.h and implemented by the kernel the extra data
should be at the next 16 byte aligned address after the terminator so fix
the validation to match.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
When arm64 signal context data overflows the base struct sigcontext it gets
placed in an extra buffer pointed to by a record of type EXTRA_CONTEXT in
the base struct sigcontext which is required to be the last record in the
base struct sigframe. The current validation code attempts to check this
by using GET_RESV_NEXT_HEAD() to step forward from the current record to
the next but that is a macro which assumes it is being provided with a
struct _aarch64_ctx and uses the size there to skip forward to the next
record. Instead validate_extra_context() passes it a struct extra_context
which has a separate size field. This compiles but results in us trying
to validate a termination record in completely the wrong place, at best
failing validation and at worst just segfaulting. Fix this by passing
the struct _aarch64_ctx we meant to into the macro.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
In handle_input_signal_copyctx() we use ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT() to validate
that the context we are saving meets expectations however we do this on
the saved copy rather than on the actual signal context passed in. This
breaks validation of EXTRA_CONTEXT since we attempt to validate the ABI
requirement that the additional space supplied is immediately after the
termination record in the standard context which will not be the case
after it has been copied to another location.
Fix this by doing the validation before we copy. Note that nothing actually
looks inside the EXTRA_CONTEXT at present.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
The za_regs signal test was enumerating the SVE vector lengths rather than
the SME vector lengths through cut'n'paste error when determining what to
test. Enumerate the SME vector lengths instead.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829160703.874492-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
Mark Brown
Colin Ian King