| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
clang warns:
util/block-info.c:298:18: error: result of comparison against a string
literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function
instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare]
if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) {
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/block-info.c:298:51: error: result of comparison against a string
literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function
instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare]
if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) {
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/block-info.c:298:18: error: result of comparison against a string
literal is unspecified (use an explicit string
comparison function instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare]
if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) {
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/block-info.c:298:51: error: result of comparison against a string
literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function
instead) [-Werror,-Wstring-compare]
if ((start_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN) && (end_line != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)) {
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/map.c:434:15: error: result of comparison against a string literal
is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead)
[-Werror,-Wstring-compare]
if (srcline != SRCLINE_UNKNOWN)
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Reviewer Notes:
Looks good to me. Some more context:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wstring-compare
The spec says:
J.1 Unspecified behavior
The following are unspecified:
.. Whether two string literals result in distinct arrays (6.4.5).
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/900
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200223193456.25291-1-nick.desaulniers@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
This patch supports jumping from tui total cycles view to symbol source
view.
For example,
perf record -b ./div
perf report --total-cycles
In total cycles view, we can select one entry and press 'a' or press
ENTER key to jump to symbol source view.
This patch also sets sort_order to NULL in cmd_report() which will use
the default branch sort order. The percent value in new annotate view
will be consistent with the percent in annotate view switched from perf
report (we observed the original percent gap with previous patches).
v2:
---
Fix the 'make NO_SLANG=1' error. (set __maybe_unused to
annotation_opts in block_hists_tui_browse()).
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191118140849.20714-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
It would be nice if we could jump to the assembler/source view (like the
normal perf report) from total cycles view.
This patch moves the block_hists_tui_browse from block-info.c to
ui/browsers/hists.c in order to reuse some browser codes (i.e
do_annotate) for implementing new annotation view.
v2:
---
Fix the 'make NO_SLANG=1' error. (Change 'int block_hists_tui_browse()'
to 'static inline int block_hists_tui_browse()')
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191118140849.20714-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
Previous patch has implemented a new option "--total-cycles". But only
stdio mode is supported.
This patch supports the tui mode and support '--percent-limit'.
For example,
perf record -b ./div
perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 1
# Samples: 2753248 of event 'cycles'
Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div
15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so
5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div
4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so
4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div
3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div
3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so
3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so
2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so
2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so
2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so
2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so
2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so
2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div
1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so
1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div
1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so
--------------------------------------------------
v7:
---
1. Since we have used use_browser in report__browse_block_hists
to support stdio mode, now we also add supporting for tui.
2. Move block tui browser code from ui/browsers/hists.c
to block-info.c.
v6:
---
Create report__tui_browse_block_hists in block-info.c
(codes are moved from builtin-report.c).
v5:
---
Fix a crash issue when running perf report without
'--total-cycles'. The issue is because the internal flag
is renamed from 'total_cycles' to 'total_cycles_mode' in
previous patch but this patch still uses 'total_cycles'
to check if the '--total-cycles' option is enabled, which
causes the code to be inconsistent.
v4:
---
Since the block collection is moved out of printing in
previous patch, this patch is updated accordingly for
tui supporting.
v3:
---
Minor change since the function name is changed:
block_total_cycles_percent -> block_info__total_cycles_percent
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-8-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
We have already supported the '--total-cycles' option in previous patch.
It's also useful to show entries only above a threshold percent.
This patch enables '--percent-limit' for not showing entries
under that percent.
For example:
perf report --total-cycles --stdio --percent-limit 1
# To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
#
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 2M of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.): 2753248
#
# Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
# ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................................. ....................
#
26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div
15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so
5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div
4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so
4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div
3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div
3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so
3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so
2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so
2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so
2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so
2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so
2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so
2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div
1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so
1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div
1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so
Committer testing:
From second exapmple onwards slightly edited for brevity:
# perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 2 --stdio
# To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
#
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 6M of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.): 6299936
#
# Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
# ............... .............. ........... .......... ...................................................................... ....................
#
2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux]
#
# (Tip: Create an archive with symtabs to analyse on other machine: perf archive)
#
# perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 1 --stdio
# Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux]
1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so
#
# perf report --total-cycles --percent-limit 0.7 --stdio
# Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux]
1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so
0.72% 544.5K 0.03% 230 [entry_64.S:657 -> entry_64.S:662] [kernel.vmlinux]
#
-------------------------------------------
It only shows the entries which 'Sampled Cycles%' > 1%.
v7:
---
No functional change. Only fix the conflict issue because
previous patches are changed.
v6:
---
No functional change. Only fix the conflict issue because
previous patches are changed.
v5:
---
No functional change. Only fix the conflict issue because
previous patches are changed.
v4:
---
No functional change. Only fix the build issue because
previous patches are changed.
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-7-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
It would be useful to support sorting for all blocks by the sampled
cycles percent per block. This is useful to concentrate on the globally
hottest blocks.
This patch implements a new option "--total-cycles" which sorts all
blocks by 'Sampled Cycles%'. The 'Sampled Cycles%' is the percent:
percent = block sampled cycles aggregation / total sampled cycles
Note that, this patch only supports "--stdio" mode.
For example,
# perf record -b ./div
# perf report --total-cycles --stdio
# To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 2M of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.): 2753248
#
# Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
# ............... .............. ........... .......... ................................................ .................
#
26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div
15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so
5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div
4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so
4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div
3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div
3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so
3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so
2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so
2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so
2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so
2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so
2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so
2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@plt+0 -> rand@plt+0] div
1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so
1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div
1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so
0.25% 182.5K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:391] libc-2.27.so
0.00% 48 1.07% 48 [x86_pmu_enable+284 -> x86_pmu_enable+298] [kernel.kallsyms]
0.00% 74 1.64% 74 [vm_mmap_pgoff+0 -> vm_mmap_pgoff+92] [kernel.kallsyms]
0.00% 73 1.62% 73 [vm_mmap+0 -> vm_mmap+48] [kernel.kallsyms]
0.00% 63 0.69% 31 [up_write+0 -> up_write+34] [kernel.kallsyms]
0.00% 13 0.29% 13 [setup_arg_pages+396 -> setup_arg_pages+413] [kernel.kallsyms]
0.00% 3 0.07% 3 [setup_arg_pages+418 -> setup_arg_pages+450] [kernel.kallsyms]
0.00% 616 6.84% 308 [security_mmap_file+0 -> security_mmap_file+72] [kernel.kallsyms]
0.00% 23 0.51% 23 [security_mmap_file+77 -> security_mmap_file+87] [kernel.kallsyms]
0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+0 -> sched_clock+4] [kernel.kallsyms]
0.00% 4 0.02% 1 [sched_clock+9 -> sched_clock+12] [kernel.kallsyms]
0.00% 1 0.02% 1 [rcu_nmi_exit+0 -> rcu_nmi_exit+9] [kernel.kallsyms]
Committer testing:
This should provide material for hours of endless joy, both from looking
for suspicious things in the implementation of this patch, such as the
top one:
# Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux]
As well from things that look legit:
# Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux]
:-)
Very short system wide taken branches session:
# perf record -h -b
Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
-b, --branch-any sample any taken branches
#
# perf record -b
^C[ perf record: Woken up 595 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 156.672 MB perf.data (196873 samples) ]
#
# perf evlist -v
cycles: size: 112, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|CPU|PERIOD|BRANCH_STACK, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, freq: 1, task: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1, branch_sample_type: ANY
#
# perf report --total-cycles --stdio
# To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 6M of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.): 6299936
#
# Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
# ............... .............. ........... .......... ...................................................................... ....................
#
2.17% 1.7M 0.08% 607 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:221] [kernel.vmlinux]
1.75% 1.3M 8.34% 65.5K [memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:147 -> memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S:151] libc-2.29.so
0.72% 544.5K 0.03% 230 [entry_64.S:657 -> entry_64.S:662] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.56% 541.8K 0.09% 672 [compiler.h:199 -> common.c:300] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.39% 293.2K 0.01% 104 [list_debug.c:43 -> list_debug.c:61] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.36% 278.6K 0.03% 272 [entry_64.S:1289 -> entry_64.S:1308] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.30% 260.8K 0.07% 564 [clear_page_64.S:47 -> clear_page_64.S:50] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.28% 215.3K 0.05% 369 [traps.c:623 -> traps.c:628] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.23% 178.1K 0.04% 278 [entry_64.S:271 -> entry_64.S:275] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.20% 152.6K 0.09% 706 [paravirt.c:177 -> paravirt.c:179] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.20% 155.8K 0.05% 373 [entry_64.S:153 -> entry_64.S:175] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.18% 136.6K 0.03% 222 [msr.h:105 -> msr.h:166] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.16% 123.0K 0.60% 4.7K [nospec-branch.h:265 -> nospec-branch.h:278] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.16% 118.3K 0.01% 44 [entry_64.S:632 -> entry_64.S:657] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.14% 104.5K 0.00% 28 [rwsem.c:1541 -> rwsem.c:1544] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.13% 99.2K 0.01% 53 [spinlock.c:150 -> spinlock.c:152] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.13% 95.5K 0.00% 35 [swap.c:456 -> swap.c:471] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.12% 96.2K 0.05% 407 [copy_user_64.S:175 -> copy_user_64.S:209] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.11% 85.9K 0.00% 31 [swap.c:400 -> page-flags.h:188] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.10% 73.0K 0.01% 52 [paravirt.h:763 -> list.h:131] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.07% 56.2K 0.03% 214 [filemap.c:1524 -> filemap.c:1557] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.07% 54.2K 0.02% 145 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1049] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.07% 50.3K 0.00% 39 [mmzone.c:49 -> mmzone.c:69] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.06% 48.3K 0.01% 40 [paravirt.h:768 -> page_alloc.c:3304] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.06% 46.7K 0.02% 155 [memory.c:1032 -> memory.c:1056] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.06% 46.9K 0.01% 103 [swap.c:867 -> swap.c:902] [kernel.vmlinux]
0.06% 47.8K 0.00% 34 [entry_64.S:1201 -> entry_64.S:1202] [kernel.vmlinux]
-----------------------------------------------------------
v7:
---
Use use_browser in report__browse_block_hists for supporting
stdio and potential tui mode.
v6:
---
Create report__browse_block_hists in block-info.c (codes are
moved from builtin-report.c). It's called from
perf_evlist__tty_browse_hists.
v5:
---
1. Move all block functions to block-info.c
2. Move the code of setting ms in block hist_entry to
other patch.
v4:
---
1. Use new option '--total-cycles' to replace
'-s total_cycles' in v3.
2. Move block info collection out of block info
printing.
v3:
---
1. Use common function block_info__process_sym to
process the blocks per symbol.
2. Remove the nasty hack for skipping calculation
of column length
3. Some minor cleanup
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-6-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
This patch provides helper routines to support new columns for block
info output.
The new columns are:
Sampled Cycles%
Sampled Cycles
Avg Cycles%
Avg Cycles
[Program Block Range]
Shared Object
v5:
---
1. Move more block related functions from builtin-report.c to
block-info.c
2. Set ms (map+sym) in block hist_entry. Because this info
is needed for reporting the block range (i.e. source line)
Committer notes:
Remove unused set_fmt() function, some build were not completing with:
util/block-info.c:396:20: error: unused function 'set_fmt' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
static inline void set_fmt(struct block_fmt *block_fmt,
^
1 error generated.
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-5-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
We have already implemented some block-info related functions.
Now it's time to do some cleanup, refactoring and move the
functions and structures to new block-info.h/block-info.c.
v4:
---
Move code for skipping column length calculation to patch:
'perf diff: Don't use hack to skip column length calculation'
v3:
---
1. Rename the patch title
2. Rename from block.h/block.c to block-info.h/block-info.c
3. Move more common part to block-info, such as
block_info__process_sym.
4. Remove the nasty hack for skipping calculation of column
length
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191107074719.26139-3-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
Nick Desaulniers
Jin Yao