aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-07-15selftests/bpf: add trickier size resolution testsAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+88
Add more BTF tests, validating that size resolution logic is correct in few trickier cases. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-06-18selftests/bpf: add test for BTF-defined mapsAndrii Nakryiko1-7/+3
Add file test for BTF-defined map definition. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-05-24selftests/bpf: use btf__parse_elf to check presence of BTF/BTF.extAndrii Nakryiko1-58/+13
Switch test_btf.c to rely on btf__parse_elf to check presence of BTF and BTF.ext data, instead of implementing its own ELF parsing. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-04-27bpf: Refactor BTF encoding macro to test_btf.hMartin KaFai Lau1-62/+1
Refactor common BTF encoding macros for other tests to use. The libbpf may reuse some of them in the future which requires some more thoughts before publishing as a libbpf API. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-04-16selftests/btf: add VAR and DATASEC case for dedup testsAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+49
Add test case verifying that dedup happens (INTs are deduped in this case) and VAR/DATASEC types are not deduped, but have their referenced type IDs adjusted correctly. Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-04-11Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller1-10/+687
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2019-04-12 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. The main changes are: 1) Improve BPF verifier scalability for large programs through two optimizations: i) remove verifier states that are not useful in pruning, ii) stop walking parentage chain once first LIVE_READ is seen. Combined gives approx 20x speedup. Increase limits for accepting large programs under root, and add various stress tests, from Alexei. 2) Implement global data support in BPF. This enables static global variables for .data, .rodata and .bss sections to be properly handled which allows for more natural program development. This also opens up the possibility to optimize program workflow by compiling ELFs only once and later only rewriting section data before reload, from Daniel and with test cases and libbpf refactoring from Joe. 3) Add config option to generate BTF type info for vmlinux as part of the kernel build process. DWARF debug info is converted via pahole to BTF. Latter relies on libbpf and makes use of BTF deduplication algorithm which results in 100x savings compared to DWARF data. Resulting .BTF section is typically about 2MB in size, from Andrii. 4) Add BPF verifier support for stack access with variable offset from helpers and add various test cases along with it, from Andrey. 5) Extend bpf_skb_adjust_room() growth BPF helper to mark inner MAC header so that L2 encapsulation can be used for tc tunnels, from Alan. 6) Add support for input __sk_buff context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN so that users can define a subset of allowed __sk_buff fields that get fed into the test program, from Stanislav. 7) Add bpf fs multi-dimensional array tests for BTF test suite and fix up various UBSAN warnings in bpftool, from Yonghong. 8) Generate a pkg-config file for libbpf, from Luca. 9) Dump program's BTF id in bpftool, from Prashant. 10) libbpf fix to use smaller BPF log buffer size for AF_XDP's XDP program, from Magnus. 11) kallsyms related fixes for the case when symbols are not present in BPF selftests and samples, from Daniel ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-04-09bpf, selftest: add test cases for BTF Var and DataSecDaniel Borkmann1-2/+663
Extend test_btf with various positive and negative tests around BTF verification of kind Var and DataSec. All passing as well: # ./test_btf [...] BTF raw test[4] (global data test #1): OK BTF raw test[5] (global data test #2): OK BTF raw test[6] (global data test #3): OK BTF raw test[7] (global data test #4, unsupported linkage): OK BTF raw test[8] (global data test #5, invalid var type): OK BTF raw test[9] (global data test #6, invalid var type (fwd type)): OK BTF raw test[10] (global data test #7, invalid var type (fwd type)): OK BTF raw test[11] (global data test #8, invalid var size): OK BTF raw test[12] (global data test #9, invalid var size): OK BTF raw test[13] (global data test #10, invalid var size): OK BTF raw test[14] (global data test #11, multiple section members): OK BTF raw test[15] (global data test #12, invalid offset): OK BTF raw test[16] (global data test #13, invalid offset): OK BTF raw test[17] (global data test #14, invalid offset): OK BTF raw test[18] (global data test #15, not var kind): OK BTF raw test[19] (global data test #16, invalid var referencing sec): OK BTF raw test[20] (global data test #17, invalid var referencing var): OK BTF raw test[21] (global data test #18, invalid var loop): OK BTF raw test[22] (global data test #19, invalid var referencing var): OK BTF raw test[23] (global data test #20, invalid ptr referencing var): OK BTF raw test[24] (global data test #21, var included in struct): OK BTF raw test[25] (global data test #22, array of var): OK [...] PASS:167 SKIP:0 FAIL:0 Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-04-01bpf: add bpffs multi-dimensional array tests in test_btfYonghong Song1-8/+24
For multiple dimensional arrays like below, int a[2][3] both llvm and pahole generated one BTF_KIND_ARRAY type like . element_type: int . index_type: unsigned int . number of elements: 6 Such a collapsed BTF_KIND_ARRAY type will cause the divergence in BTF vs. the user code. In the compile-once-run-everywhere project, the header file is generated from BTF and used for bpf program, and the definition in the header file will be different from what user expects. But the kernel actually supports chained multi-dimensional array types properly. The above "int a[2][3]" can be represented as Type #n: . element_type: int . index_type: unsigned int . number of elements: 3 Type #(n+1): . element_type: type #n . index_type: unsigned int . number of elements: 2 The following llvm commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL357215 also enables llvm to generated proper chained multi-dimensional arrays. The test_btf already has a raw test ("struct test #1") for chained multi-dimensional arrays. This patch added amended bpffs test for chained multi-dimensional arrays. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-03-27selftests/bpf: add btf_dedup test for VOID equivalence checkAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+47
This patch adds specific test exposing bug in btf_dedup_is_equiv() when comparing candidate VOID type to a non-VOID canonical type. It's important for canonical type to be anonymous, otherwise name equality check will do the right thing and will exit early. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-03-14selftests/bpf: add fwd enum resolution test for btf_dedupAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+44
This patch adds test verifying new btf_dedup logic of resolving forward-declared enums. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-03-01selftests/bpf: add btf_dedup test of FWD/STRUCT resolutionAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+45
This patch adds a btf_dedup test exercising logic of STRUCT<->FWD resolution and validating that STRUCT is not resolved to a FWD. It also forces hash collisions, forcing both FWD and STRUCT to be candidates for each other. Previously this condition caused infinite loop due to FWD pointing to STRUCT and STRUCT pointing to its FWD. Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-03-01selftests/bpf: fix btf_dedup testing codeAndrii Nakryiko1-2/+2
btf_dedup testing code doesn't account for length of struct btf_header when calculating the start of a string section. This patch fixes this problem. Fixes: 49b57e0d01db ("tools/bpf: remove btf__get_strings() superseded by raw data API") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-16Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller1-13/+26
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2019-02-16 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. The main changes are: 1) numerous libbpf API improvements, from Andrii, Andrey, Yonghong. 2) test all bpf progs in alu32 mode, from Jiong. 3) skb->sk access and bpf_sk_fullsock(), bpf_tcp_sock() helpers, from Martin. 4) support for IP encap in lwt bpf progs, from Peter. 5) remove XDP_QUERY_XSK_UMEM dead code, from Jan. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-08Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netDavid S. Miller1-6/+3
An ipvlan bug fix in 'net' conflicted with the abstraction away of the IPV6 specific support in 'net-next'. Similarly, a bug fix for mlx5 in 'net' conflicted with the flow action conversion in 'net-next'. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-02-08tools/bpf: remove btf__get_strings() superseded by raw data APIAndrii Nakryiko1-13/+26
Now that we have btf__get_raw_data() it's trivial for tests to iterate over all strings for testing purposes, which eliminates the need for btf__get_strings() API. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-02-05tools/bpf: fix a selftest test_btf failureYonghong Song1-1/+1
Commit 9c651127445c ("selftests/btf: add initial BTF dedup tests") added dedup tests in test_btf.c. It broke the raw test: BTF raw test[71] (func proto (Bad arg name_off)): btf_raw_create:2905:FAIL Error getting string #65535, strs_cnt:1 The test itself encodes invalid func_proto parameter name offset 0xffffFFFF as a negative test for the kernel. The above commit changed the meaning of that offset and resulted in a user space error. #define NAME_NTH(N) (0xffff0000 | N) #define IS_NAME_NTH(X) ((X & 0xffff0000) == 0xffff0000) #define GET_NAME_NTH_IDX(X) (X & 0x0000ffff) Currently, the kernel permits maximum name offset 0xffff. Set the test name off as 0x0fffFFFF to trigger the kernel verification failure. Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Fixes: 9c651127445c ("selftests/btf: add initial BTF dedup tests") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-02-05selftests/btf: add initial BTF dedup testsAndrii Nakryiko1-15/+520
This patch sets up a new kind of tests (BTF dedup tests) and tests few aspects of BTF dedup algorithm. More complete set of tests will come in follow up patches. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-04libbpf: fix libbpf_printStanislav Fomichev1-11/+2
With the recent print rework we now have the following problem: pr_{warning,info,debug} expand to __pr which calls libbpf_print. libbpf_print does va_start and calls __libbpf_pr with va_list argument. In __base_pr we again do va_start. Because the next argument is a va_list, we don't get correct pointer to the argument (and print noting in my case, I don't know why it doesn't crash tbh). Fix this by changing libbpf_print_fn_t signature to accept va_list and remove unneeded calls to va_start in the existing users. Alternatively, this can we solved by exporting __libbpf_pr and changing __pr macro to (and killing libbpf_print): { if (__libbpf_pr) __libbpf_pr(level, "libbpf: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) } Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-02-04tools/bpf: simplify libbpf API function libbpf_set_print()Yonghong Song1-3/+4
Currently, the libbpf API function libbpf_set_print() takes three function pointer parameters for warning, info and debug printout respectively. This patch changes the API to have just one function pointer parameter and the function pointer has one additional parameter "debugging level". So if in the future, if the debug level is increased, the function signature won't change. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-29tools/bpf: fix test_btf for typedef func_proto caseYonghong Song1-6/+3
Fixed one test_btf raw test such that typedef func_proto is permitted now. Fixes: 78a2540e8945 ("tools/bpf: Add tests for BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO and BTF_KIND_FUNC") Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-23selftests: bpf: add tests for dead code removalJakub Kicinski1-7/+389
Add tests for newly added dead code elimination. Both verifier and BTF tests are added. BTF test infrastructure has to be extended to be able to account for line info which is eliminated during dead code removal. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-16tools/bpf: add bpffs pretty print test for int128Yonghong Song1-0/+79
The bpffs pretty print test is extended to cover int128 types. Tested on an x64 machine. $ test_btf -p ...... BTF pretty print array(#3)......OK PASS:9 SKIP:0 FAIL:0 Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-16tools/bpf: refactor test_btf pretty printing for multiple map value formatsYonghong Song1-37/+75
The test_btf pretty print is refactored in order to easily support multiple map value formats. The next patch will add __int128 type tests which needs macro guard __SIZEOF_INT128__. There is no functionality change with this patch. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-16tools/bpf: add int128 raw test in test_btfYonghong Song1-0/+93
Several int128 raw type tests are added to test_btf. Currently these tests are enabled only for x64 and arm64 for which kernel has CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 set. $ test_btf ...... BTF raw test[106] (128-bit int): OK BTF raw test[107] (struct, 128-bit int member): OK BTF raw test[108] (struct, 120-bit int member bitfield): OK BTF raw test[109] (struct, kind_flag, 128-bit int member): OK BTF raw test[110] (struct, kind_flag, 120-bit int member bitfield): OK ...... Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-11tools/bpf: test btf bitfield with >=256 struct member offsetYonghong Song1-8/+21
This patch modified test_btf pretty print test to cover the bitfield with struct member equal to or greater 256. Without the previous kernel patch fix, the modified test will fail: $ test_btf -p ...... BTF pretty print array(#1)......unexpected pprint output expected: 0: {0,0,0,0x3,0x0,0x3,{0|[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]},ENUM_ZERO,4,0x1} read: 0: {0,0,0,0x3,0x0,0x3,{0|[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]},ENUM_ZERO,4,0x0} BTF pretty print array(#2)......unexpected pprint output expected: 0: {0,0,0,0x3,0x0,0x3,{0|[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]},ENUM_ZERO,4,0x1} read: 0: {0,0,0,0x3,0x0,0x3,{0|[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]},ENUM_ZERO,4,0x0} PASS:6 SKIP:0 FAIL:2 With the kernel fix, the modified test will succeed: $ test_btf -p ...... BTF pretty print array(#1)......OK BTF pretty print array(#2)......OK PASS:8 SKIP:0 FAIL:0 Fixes: 9d5f9f701b18 ("bpf: btf: fix struct/union/fwd types with kind_flag") Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-19bpf: Add BPF_LD_IMM64 to the line_info testMartin KaFai Lau1-0/+27
This patch adds a BPF_LD_IMM64 case to the line_info test to ensure the kernel rejects linfo_info.insn_off pointing to the 2nd 8 bytes of the BPF_LD_IMM64. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-18tools/bpf: check precise {func, line, jited_line}_info_rec_size in test_btfYonghong Song1-5/+5
Current btf func_info, line_info and jited_line are designed to be extensible. The record sizes for {func,line}_info are passed to kernel, and the record sizes for {func,line,jited_line}_info are returned to userspace during bpf_prog_info query. In bpf selftests test_btf.c, when testing whether kernel returns a legitimate {func,line, jited_line)_info rec_size, the test only compares to the minimum allowed size. If the returned rec_size is smaller than the minimum allowed size, it is considered incorrect. The minimum allowed size for these three info sizes are equal to current value of sizeof(struct bpf_func_info), sizeof(struct bpf_line_info) and sizeof(__u64). The original thinking was that in the future when rec_size is increased in kernel, the same test should run correctly. But this sacrificed the precision of testing under the very kernel the test is shipped with, and bpf selftest is typically run with the same repo kernel. So this patch changed the testing of rec_size such that the kernel returned value should be equal to the size defined by tools uapi header bpf.h which syncs with kernel uapi header. Martin discovered a bug in one of rec_size comparisons. Instead of comparing to minimum func_info rec_size 8, it compares to 4. This patch fixed that issue as well. Fixes: 999d82cbc044 ("tools/bpf: enhance test_btf file testing to test func info") Fixes: 05687352c600 ("bpf: Refactor and bug fix in test_func_type in test_btf.c") Fixes: 4d6304c76355 ("bpf: Add unit tests for bpf_line_info") Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-18tools/bpf: test kernel bpffs map pretty print with struct kind_flagYonghong Song1-14/+154
The new tests are added to test bpffs map pretty print in kernel with kind_flag for structure type. $ test_btf -p ...... BTF pretty print array(#1)......OK BTF pretty print array(#2)......OK PASS:8 SKIP:0 FAIL:0 Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-18tools/bpf: add test_btf unit tests for kind_flagYonghong Song1-2/+494
This patch added unit tests for different types handling type->info.kind_flag. The following new tests are added: $ test_btf ... BTF raw test[82] (invalid int kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[83] (invalid ptr kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[84] (invalid array kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[85] (invalid enum kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[86] (valid fwd kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[87] (invalid typedef kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[88] (invalid volatile kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[89] (invalid const kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[90] (invalid restrict kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[91] (invalid func kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[92] (invalid func_proto kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[93] (valid struct kind_flag, bitfield_size = 0): OK BTF raw test[94] (valid struct kind_flag, int member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[95] (valid union kind_flag, int member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[96] (valid struct kind_flag, enum member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[97] (valid union kind_flag, enum member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[98] (valid struct kind_flag, typedef member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[99] (valid union kind_flag, typedef member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[100] (invalid struct type, bitfield_size greater than struct size): OK BTF raw test[101] (invalid struct type, kind_flag bitfield base_type int not regular): OK BTF raw test[102] (invalid struct type, kind_flag base_type int not regular): OK BTF raw test[103] (invalid union type, bitfield_size greater than struct size): OK ... PASS:122 SKIP:0 FAIL:0 The second parameter name of macro BTF_INFO_ENC(kind, root, vlen) in selftests test_btf.c is also renamed from "root" to "kind_flag". Note that before this patch "root" is not used and always 0. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-13bpf: Remove !func_info and !line_info check from test_btf and bpftoolMartin KaFai Lau1-7/+0
kernel can provide the func_info and line_info even it fails the btf_dump_raw_ok() test because they don't contain kernel address. This patch removes the corresponding '== 0' test. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-10Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller1-106/+714
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2018-12-11 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. It has three minor merge conflicts, resolutions: 1) tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c Take first chunk with alignment_prevented_execution. 2) net/core/filter.c [...] case bpf_ctx_range_ptr(struct __sk_buff, flow_keys): case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, wire_len): return false; [...] 3) include/uapi/linux/bpf.h Take the second chunk for the two cases each. The main changes are: 1) Add support for BPF line info via BTF and extend libbpf as well as bpftool's program dump to annotate output with BPF C code to facilitate debugging and introspection, from Martin. 2) Add support for BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_{K,X} in interpreter and all JIT backends, from Jiong. 3) Improve BPF test coverage on archs with no efficient unaligned access by adding an "any alignment" flag to the BPF program load to forcefully disable verifier alignment checks, from David. 4) Add a new bpf_prog_test_run_xattr() API to libbpf which allows for proper use of BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with data_out, from Lorenz. 5) Extend tc BPF programs to use a new __sk_buff field called wire_len for more accurate accounting of packets going to wire, from Petar. 6) Improve bpftool to allow dumping the trace pipe from it and add several improvements in bash completion and map/prog dump, from Quentin. 7) Optimize arm64 BPF JIT to always emit movn/movk/movk sequence for kernel addresses and add a dedicated BPF JIT backend allocator, from Ard. 8) Add a BPF helper function for IR remotes to report mouse movements, from Sean. 9) Various cleanups in BPF prog dump e.g. to make UAPI bpf_prog_info member naming consistent with existing conventions, from Yonghong and Song. 10) Misc cleanups and improvements in allowing to pass interface name via cmdline for xdp1 BPF example, from Matteo. 11) Fix a potential segfault in BPF sample loader's kprobes handling, from Daniel T. 12) Fix SPDX license in libbpf's README.rst, from Andrey. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-10tools/bpf: rename *_info_cnt to nr_*_infoYonghong Song1-30/+30
Rename all occurances of *_info_cnt field access to nr_*_info in tools directory. The local variables finfo_cnt, linfo_cnt and jited_linfo_cnt in function do_dump() of tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c are also changed to nr_finfo, nr_linfo and nr_jited_linfo to keep naming convention consistent. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-09Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netDavid S. Miller1-7/+368
Several conflicts, seemingly all over the place. I used Stephen Rothwell's sample resolutions for many of these, if not just to double check my own work, so definitely the credit largely goes to him. The NFP conflict consisted of a bug fix (moving operations past the rhashtable operation) while chaning the initial argument in the function call in the moved code. The net/dsa/master.c conflict had to do with a bug fix intermixing of making dsa_master_set_mtu() static with the fixing of the tagging attribute location. cls_flower had a conflict because the dup reject fix from Or overlapped with the addition of port range classifiction. __set_phy_supported()'s conflict was relatively easy to resolve because Andrew fixed it in both trees, so it was just a matter of taking the net-next copy. Or at least I think it was :-) Joe Stringer's fix to the handling of netns id 0 in bpf_sk_lookup() intermixed with changes on how the sdif and caller_net are calculated in these code paths in net-next. The remaining BPF conflicts were largely about the addition of the __bpf_md_ptr stuff in 'net' overlapping with adjustments and additions to the relevant data structure where the MD pointer macros are used. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-09bpf: Add unit tests for bpf_line_infoMartin KaFai Lau1-17/+580
Add unit tests for bpf_line_info for both BPF_PROG_LOAD and BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD. jit enabled: [root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_btf -k 0 BTF prog info raw test[5] (line_info (No subprog)): OK BTF prog info raw test[6] (line_info (No subprog. insn_off >= prog->len)): OK BTF prog info raw test[7] (line_info (No subprog. zero tailing line_info): OK BTF prog info raw test[8] (line_info (No subprog. nonzero tailing line_info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[9] (line_info (subprog)): OK BTF prog info raw test[10] (line_info (subprog + func_info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[11] (line_info (subprog. missing 1st func line info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[12] (line_info (subprog. missing 2nd func line info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[13] (line_info (subprog. unordered insn offset)): OK jit disabled: BTF prog info raw test[5] (line_info (No subprog)): not jited. skipping jited_line_info check. OK BTF prog info raw test[6] (line_info (No subprog. insn_off >= prog->len)): OK BTF prog info raw test[7] (line_info (No subprog. zero tailing line_info): not jited. skipping jited_line_info check. OK BTF prog info raw test[8] (line_info (No subprog. nonzero tailing line_info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[9] (line_info (subprog)): not jited. skipping jited_line_info check. OK BTF prog info raw test[10] (line_info (subprog + func_info)): not jited. skipping jited_line_info check. OK BTF prog info raw test[11] (line_info (subprog. missing 1st func line info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[12] (line_info (subprog. missing 2nd func line info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[13] (line_info (subprog. unordered insn offset)): OK Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-09bpf: Refactor and bug fix in test_func_type in test_btf.cMartin KaFai Lau1-86/+125
1) bpf_load_program_xattr() is absorbing the EBIG error which makes testing this case impossible. It is replaced with a direct syscall(__NR_bpf, BPF_PROG_LOAD,...). 2) The test_func_type() is renamed to test_info_raw() to prepare for the new line_info test in the next patch. 3) The bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() testing for func_info is refactored to test_get_finfo(). A new test_get_linfo() will be added in the next patch for testing line_info purpose. 4) The test->func_info_cnt is checked instead of a static value "2". 5) Remove unnecessary "\n" in error message. 6) Adding back info_raw_test_num to the cmd arg such that a specific test case can be tested, like all other existing tests. 7) Fix a bug in handling expected_prog_load_failure. A test could pass even if prog_fd != -1 while expected_prog_load_failure is true. 8) The min rec_size check should be < 8 instead of < 4. Fixes: 4798c4ba3ba9 ("tools/bpf: extends test_btf to test load/retrieve func_type info") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-05bpf: Expect !info.func_info and insn_off name changes in test_btf/libbpf/bpftoolMartin KaFai Lau1-1/+7
Similar to info.jited_*, info.func_info could be 0 if bpf_dump_raw_ok() == false. This patch makes changes to test_btf and bpftool to expect info.func_info could be 0. This patch also makes the needed changes for s/insn_offset/insn_off/. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-28tools/bpf: add addition type tests to test_btfYonghong Song1-0/+361
The following additional unit testcases are added to test_btf: ... BTF raw test[42] (typedef (invalid name, name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[43] (typedef (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK BTF raw test[44] (ptr type (invalid name, name_off <> 0)): OK BTF raw test[45] (volatile type (invalid name, name_off <> 0)): OK BTF raw test[46] (const type (invalid name, name_off <> 0)): OK BTF raw test[47] (restrict type (invalid name, name_off <> 0)): OK BTF raw test[48] (fwd type (invalid name, name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[49] (fwd type (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK BTF raw test[50] (array type (invalid name, name_off <> 0)): OK BTF raw test[51] (struct type (name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[52] (struct type (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK BTF raw test[53] (struct member (name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[54] (struct member (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK BTF raw test[55] (enum type (name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[56] (enum type (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK BTF raw test[57] (enum member (invalid name, name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[58] (enum member (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK ... Fixes: c0fa1b6c3efc ("bpf: btf: Add BTF tests") Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-28tools/bpf: fix two test_btf unit test casesMartin KaFai Lau1-7/+7
There are two unit test cases, which should encode TYPEDEF type, but instead encode PTR type. The error is flagged out after enforcing name checking in the previous patch. Fixes: c0fa1b6c3efc ("bpf: btf: Add BTF tests") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-26libbpf: Name changing for btf_get_from_idMartin KaFai Lau1-1/+1
s/btf_get_from_id/btf__get_from_id/ to restore the API naming convention. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-26tools/bpf: change selftest test_btf for both jit and non-jitYonghong Song1-30/+3
The selftest test_btf is changed to test both jit and non-jit. The test result should be the same regardless of whether jit is enabled or not. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-22tools/bpf: fix spelling mistake "memeory" -> "memory"Colin Ian King1-2/+2
The CHECK message contains a spelling mistake, fix it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-11-20tools/bpf: enhance test_btf file testing to test func infoYonghong Song1-9/+108
Change the bpf programs test_btf_haskv.c and test_btf_nokv.c to have two sections, and enhance test_btf.c test_file feature to test btf func_info returned by the kernel. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-20tools/bpf: extends test_btf to test load/retrieve func_type infoYonghong Song1-3/+329
A two function bpf program is loaded with btf and func_info. After successful prog load, the bpf_get_info syscall is called to retrieve prog info to ensure the types returned from the kernel matches the types passed to the kernel from the user space. Several negative tests are also added to test loading/retriving of func_type info. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-20tools/bpf: Add tests for BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO and BTF_KIND_FUNCMartin KaFai Lau1-2/+472
This patch adds unit tests for BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO and BTF_KIND_FUNC to test_btf. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-08-30tools/bpf: add bpffs percpu map pretty print tests in test_btfYonghong Song1-35/+144
The bpf selftest test_btf is extended to test bpffs percpu map pretty print for percpu array, percpu hash and percpu lru hash. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-08-11bpf: Refactor ARRAY_SIZE macro to bpf_util.hMartin KaFai Lau1-4/+1
This patch refactors the ARRAY_SIZE macro to bpf_util.h. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-08-10tools/bpf: add bpffs pretty print btf test for hash/lru_hash mapsYonghong Song1-15/+72
Pretty print tests for hash/lru_hash maps are added in test_btf.c. The btf type blob is the same as pretty print array map test. The test result: $ mount -t bpf bpf /sys/fs/bpf $ ./test_btf -p BTF pretty print array......OK BTF pretty print hash......OK BTF pretty print lru hash......OK PASS:3 SKIP:0 FAIL:0 Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-27bpf: btf: Use exact btf value_size match in map_check_btf()Martin KaFai Lau1-2/+84
The current map_check_btf() in BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY rejects '> map->value_size' to ensure map_seq_show_elem() will not access things beyond an array element. Yonghong suggested that using '!=' is a more correct check. The 8 bytes round_up on value_size is stored in array->elem_size. Hence, using '!=' on map->value_size is a proper check. This patch also adds new tests to check the btf array key type and value type. Two of these new tests verify the btf's value_size (the change in this patch). It also fixes two existing tests that wrongly encoded a btf's type size (pprint_test) and the value_type_id (in one of the raw_tests[]). However, that do not affect these two BTF verification tests before or after this test changes. These two tests mainly failed at array creation time after this patch. Fixes: a26ca7c982cb ("bpf: btf: Add pretty print support to the basic arraymap") Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-07-24bpf: btf: Ensure the member->offset is in the right orderMartin KaFai Lau1-0/+28
This patch ensures the member->offset of a struct is in the correct order (i.e the later member's offset cannot go backward). The current "pahole -J" BTF encoder does not generate something like this. However, checking this can ensure future encoder will not violate this. Fixes: 69b693f0aefa ("bpf: btf: Introduce BPF Type Format (BTF)") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-06-02bpf: btf: Ensure t->type == 0 for BTF_KIND_FWDMartin KaFai Lau1-0/+22
The t->type in BTF_KIND_FWD is not used. It must be 0. This patch ensures that and also adds a test case in test_btf.c Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Copyright © 1996 – 2023 Jason A. Donenfeld. All Rights Reverse Engineered.