aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-01-01selftests/bpf: fix error printing in test_devmap()Xiaozhou Liu1-1/+1
As a simple fix, just print the correct map type. Signed-off-by: Xiaozhou Liu <liuxiaozhou@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-21bpf: fix segfault in test_verifier selftestDaniel Borkmann1-1/+2
Minor fallout from merge resolution, test_verifier was segfaulting because the REJECT result was correct, but errstr was NULL. Properly fix it as in 339bbff2d6e0. Fixes: 339bbff2d6e0 ("Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-20Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller7-73/+1053
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2018-12-21 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. There is a merge conflict in test_verifier.c. Result looks as follows: [...] }, { "calls: cross frame pruning", .insns = { [...] .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, .errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr = "!read_ok", .result = REJECT, }, { "jset: functional", .insns = { [...] { "jset: unknown const compare not taken", .insns = { BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr = "!read_ok", .result = REJECT, }, [...] { "jset: range", .insns = { [...] }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, .result = ACCEPT, }, The main changes are: 1) Various BTF related improvements in order to get line info working. Meaning, verifier will now annotate the corresponding BPF C code to the error log, from Martin and Yonghong. 2) Implement support for raw BPF tracepoints in modules, from Matt. 3) Add several improvements to verifier state logic, namely speeding up stacksafe check, optimizations for stack state equivalence test and safety checks for liveness analysis, from Alexei. 4) Teach verifier to make use of BPF_JSET instruction, add several test cases to kselftests and remove nfp specific JSET optimization now that verifier has awareness, from Jakub. 5) Improve BPF verifier's slot_type marking logic in order to allow more stack slot sharing, from Jiong. 6) Add sk_msg->size member for context access and add set of fixes and improvements to make sock_map with kTLS usable with openssl based applications, from John. 7) Several cleanups and documentation updates in bpftool as well as auto-mount of tracefs for "bpftool prog tracelog" command, from Quentin. 8) Include sub-program tags from now on in bpf_prog_info in order to have a reliable way for user space to get all tags of the program e.g. needed for kallsyms correlation, from Song. 9) Add BTF annotations for cgroup_local_storage BPF maps and implement bpf fs pretty print support, from Roman. 10) Fix bpftool in order to allow for cross-compilation, from Ivan. 11) Update of bpftool license to GPLv2-only + BSD-2-Clause in order to be compatible with libbfd and allow for Debian packaging, from Jakub. 12) Remove an obsolete prog->aux sanitation in dump and get rid of version check for prog load, from Daniel. 13) Fix a memory leak in libbpf's line info handling, from Prashant. 14) Fix cpumap's frame alignment for build_skb() so that skb_shared_info does not get unaligned, from Jesper. 15) Fix test_progs kselftest to work with older compilers which are less smart in optimizing (and thus throwing build error), from Stanislav. 16) Cleanup and simplify AF_XDP socket teardown, from Björn. 17) Fix sk lookup in BPF kselftest's test_sock_addr with regards to netns_id argument, from Andrey. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-20bpf: sk_msg, fix sk_msg_md access past end testJohn Fastabend1-1/+1
Currently, the test to ensure reads past the end of the sk_msg_md data structure fail is incorrectly expecting success. Fix this typo and use correct expected error. Fixes: 945a47d87cee ("bpf: sk_msg, add tests for size field") Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-20Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netDavid S. Miller2-24/+49
Lots of conflicts, by happily all cases of overlapping changes, parallel adds, things of that nature. Thanks to Stephen Rothwell, Saeed Mahameed, and others for their guidance in these resolutions. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-20selftests: bpf: add missing executables to .gitignoreJakub Kicinski1-0/+1
commit 435f90a338ae ("selftests/bpf: add a test case for sock_ops perf-event notification") missed adding new test to gitignore. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-20selftests: bpf: verifier: add tests for JSET interpretationJakub Kicinski1-0/+96
Validate that the verifier reasons correctly about the bounds and removes dead code based on results of JSET instruction. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-20selftests: bpf: add trivial JSET testsJakub Kicinski1-31/+178
We seem to have no JSET instruction test, and LLVM does not generate it at all, so let's add a simple hand-coded test to make sure JIT implementations are correct. v2: - extend test_verifier to handle multiple inputs and add the sample there (Daniel) - add a sign extension case Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-19bpf: Add BPF_LD_IMM64 to the line_info testMartin KaFai Lau1-0/+27
This patch adds a BPF_LD_IMM64 case to the line_info test to ensure the kernel rejects linfo_info.insn_off pointing to the 2nd 8 bytes of the BPF_LD_IMM64. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-19bpf: sk_msg, add tests for size fieldJohn Fastabend1-3/+13
This adds tests to read the size field to test_verifier. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-18bpf: correct slot_type marking logic to allow more stack slot sharingJiong Wang1-2/+32
Verifier is supposed to support sharing stack slot allocated to ptr with SCALAR_VALUE for privileged program. However this doesn't happen for some cases. The reason is verifier is not clearing slot_type STACK_SPILL for all bytes, it only clears part of them, while verifier is using: slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL as a convention to check one slot is ptr type. So, the consequence of partial clearing slot_type is verifier could treat a partially overridden ptr slot, which should now be a SCALAR_VALUE slot, still as ptr slot, and rejects some valid programs. Before this patch, test_xdp_noinline.o under bpf selftests, bpf_lxc.o and bpf_netdev.o under Cilium bpf repo, when built with -mattr=+alu32 are rejected due to this issue. After this patch, they all accepted. There is no processed insn number change before and after this patch on Cilium bpf programs. Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-18tools/bpf: check precise {func, line, jited_line}_info_rec_size in test_btfYonghong Song1-5/+5
Current btf func_info, line_info and jited_line are designed to be extensible. The record sizes for {func,line}_info are passed to kernel, and the record sizes for {func,line,jited_line}_info are returned to userspace during bpf_prog_info query. In bpf selftests test_btf.c, when testing whether kernel returns a legitimate {func,line, jited_line)_info rec_size, the test only compares to the minimum allowed size. If the returned rec_size is smaller than the minimum allowed size, it is considered incorrect. The minimum allowed size for these three info sizes are equal to current value of sizeof(struct bpf_func_info), sizeof(struct bpf_line_info) and sizeof(__u64). The original thinking was that in the future when rec_size is increased in kernel, the same test should run correctly. But this sacrificed the precision of testing under the very kernel the test is shipped with, and bpf selftest is typically run with the same repo kernel. So this patch changed the testing of rec_size such that the kernel returned value should be equal to the size defined by tools uapi header bpf.h which syncs with kernel uapi header. Martin discovered a bug in one of rec_size comparisons. Instead of comparing to minimum func_info rec_size 8, it compares to 4. This patch fixed that issue as well. Fixes: 999d82cbc044 ("tools/bpf: enhance test_btf file testing to test func info") Fixes: 05687352c600 ("bpf: Refactor and bug fix in test_func_type in test_btf.c") Fixes: 4d6304c76355 ("bpf: Add unit tests for bpf_line_info") Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-18tools/bpf: test kernel bpffs map pretty print with struct kind_flagYonghong Song1-14/+154
The new tests are added to test bpffs map pretty print in kernel with kind_flag for structure type. $ test_btf -p ...... BTF pretty print array(#1)......OK BTF pretty print array(#2)......OK PASS:8 SKIP:0 FAIL:0 Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-18tools/bpf: add test_btf unit tests for kind_flagYonghong Song1-2/+494
This patch added unit tests for different types handling type->info.kind_flag. The following new tests are added: $ test_btf ... BTF raw test[82] (invalid int kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[83] (invalid ptr kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[84] (invalid array kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[85] (invalid enum kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[86] (valid fwd kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[87] (invalid typedef kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[88] (invalid volatile kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[89] (invalid const kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[90] (invalid restrict kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[91] (invalid func kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[92] (invalid func_proto kind_flag): OK BTF raw test[93] (valid struct kind_flag, bitfield_size = 0): OK BTF raw test[94] (valid struct kind_flag, int member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[95] (valid union kind_flag, int member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[96] (valid struct kind_flag, enum member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[97] (valid union kind_flag, enum member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[98] (valid struct kind_flag, typedef member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[99] (valid union kind_flag, typedef member, bitfield_size != 0): OK BTF raw test[100] (invalid struct type, bitfield_size greater than struct size): OK BTF raw test[101] (invalid struct type, kind_flag bitfield base_type int not regular): OK BTF raw test[102] (invalid struct type, kind_flag base_type int not regular): OK BTF raw test[103] (invalid union type, bitfield_size greater than struct size): OK ... PASS:122 SKIP:0 FAIL:0 The second parameter name of macro BTF_INFO_ENC(kind, root, vlen) in selftests test_btf.c is also renamed from "root" to "kind_flag". Note that before this patch "root" is not used and always 0. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-15bpf: improve stacksafe state comparisonAlexei Starovoitov1-0/+22
"if (old->allocated_stack > cur->allocated_stack)" check is too conservative. In some cases explored stack could have allocated more space, but that stack space was not live. The test case improves from 19 to 15 processed insns and improvement on real programs is significant as well: before after bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 1940 1831 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3089 3029 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1065 1064 bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 28052 26309 bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 35487 33517 bpf_netdev.o 10864 9713 bpf_overlay.o 6643 6184 bpf_lcx_jit.o 38437 37335 Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-15selftests/bpf: check insn processed in test_verifierAlexei Starovoitov1-1/+14
Teach test_verifier to parse verifier output for insn processed and compare with expected number. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-13selftests/bpf: Fix sk lookup usage in test_sock_addrAndrey Ignatov2-4/+8
Semantic of netns_id argument of bpf_sk_lookup_tcp and bpf_sk_lookup_udp was changed (fixed) in f71c6143c203. Corresponding changes have to be applied to all call sites in selftests. The patch fixes corresponding call sites in test_sock_addr test: pass BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS instead of 0 in netns_id argument. Fixes: f71c6143c203 ("bpf: Support sk lookup in netns with id 0") Reported-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com> Acked-by: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz> Tested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-13bpf: verifier: make sure callees don't prune with caller differencesJakub Kicinski1-0/+28
Currently for liveness and state pruning the register parentage chains don't include states of the callee. This makes some sense as the callee can't access those registers. However, this means that READs done after the callee returns will not propagate into the states of the callee. Callee will then perform pruning disregarding differences in caller state. Example: 0: (85) call bpf_user_rnd_u32 1: (b7) r8 = 0 2: (55) if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+1 3: (b7) r8 = 1 4: (bf) r1 = r8 5: (85) call pc+4 6: (15) if r8 == 0x1 goto pc+1 7: (05) *(u64 *)(r9 - 8) = r3 8: (b7) r0 = 0 9: (95) exit 10: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+0 11: (95) exit Here we acquire unknown state with call to get_random() [1]. Then we store this random state in r8 (either 0 or 1) [1 - 3], and make a call on line 5. Callee does nothing but a trivial conditional jump (to create a pruning point). Upon return caller checks the state of r8 and either performs an unsafe read or not. Verifier will first explore the path with r8 == 1, creating a pruning point at [11]. The parentage chain for r8 will include only callers states so once verifier reaches [6] it will mark liveness only on states in the caller, and not [11]. Now when verifier walks the paths with r8 == 0 it will reach [11] and since REG_LIVE_READ on r8 was not propagated there it will prune the walk entirely (stop walking the entire program, not just the callee). Since [6] was never walked with r8 == 0, [7] will be considered dead and replaced with "goto -1" causing hang at runtime. This patch weaves the callee's explored states onto the callers parentage chain. Rough parentage for r8 would have looked like this before: [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [10] [11] [6] [7] | | ,---|----. | | | sl0: sl0: / sl0: \ sl0: sl0: sl0: fr0: r8 <-- fr0: r8<+--fr0: r8 `fr0: r8 ,fr0: r8<-fr0: r8 \ fr1: r8 <- fr1: r8 / \__________________/ after: [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [10] [11] [6] [7] | | | | | | sl0: sl0: sl0: sl0: sl0: sl0: fr0: r8 <-- fr0: r8 <- fr0: r8 <- fr0: r8 <-fr0: r8<-fr0: r8 fr1: r8 <- fr1: r8 Now the mark from instruction 6 will travel through callees states. Note that we don't have to connect r0 because its overwritten by callees state on return and r1 - r5 because those are not alive any more once a call is made. v2: - don't connect the callees registers twice (Alexei: suggestion & code) - add more details to the comment (Ed & Alexei) v1: don't unnecessarily link caller saved regs (Jiong) Fixes: f4d7e40a5b71 ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)") Reported-by: David Beckett <david.beckett@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-13bpf: Remove !func_info and !line_info check from test_btf and bpftoolMartin KaFai Lau1-7/+0
kernel can provide the func_info and line_info even it fails the btf_dump_raw_ok() test because they don't contain kernel address. This patch removes the corresponding '== 0' test. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-12selftests/bpf: add btf annotations for cgroup_local_storage mapsRoman Gushchin1-0/+6
Add btf annotations to cgroup local storage maps (per-cpu and shared) in the network packet counting example. Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-12selftests/bpf: use __bpf_constant_htons in test_prog.cStanislav Fomichev1-4/+4
For some reason, my older GCC (< 4.8) isn't smart enough to optimize the !__builtin_constant_p() branch in bpf_htons, I see: error: implicit declaration of function '__builtin_bswap16' Let's use __bpf_constant_htons as suggested by Daniel Borkmann. I tried to use simple htons, but it produces the following: test_progs.c:54:17: error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function .eth.h_proto = htons(ETH_P_IP), Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-10Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller8-150/+978
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2018-12-11 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. It has three minor merge conflicts, resolutions: 1) tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c Take first chunk with alignment_prevented_execution. 2) net/core/filter.c [...] case bpf_ctx_range_ptr(struct __sk_buff, flow_keys): case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, wire_len): return false; [...] 3) include/uapi/linux/bpf.h Take the second chunk for the two cases each. The main changes are: 1) Add support for BPF line info via BTF and extend libbpf as well as bpftool's program dump to annotate output with BPF C code to facilitate debugging and introspection, from Martin. 2) Add support for BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_{K,X} in interpreter and all JIT backends, from Jiong. 3) Improve BPF test coverage on archs with no efficient unaligned access by adding an "any alignment" flag to the BPF program load to forcefully disable verifier alignment checks, from David. 4) Add a new bpf_prog_test_run_xattr() API to libbpf which allows for proper use of BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with data_out, from Lorenz. 5) Extend tc BPF programs to use a new __sk_buff field called wire_len for more accurate accounting of packets going to wire, from Petar. 6) Improve bpftool to allow dumping the trace pipe from it and add several improvements in bash completion and map/prog dump, from Quentin. 7) Optimize arm64 BPF JIT to always emit movn/movk/movk sequence for kernel addresses and add a dedicated BPF JIT backend allocator, from Ard. 8) Add a BPF helper function for IR remotes to report mouse movements, from Sean. 9) Various cleanups in BPF prog dump e.g. to make UAPI bpf_prog_info member naming consistent with existing conventions, from Yonghong and Song. 10) Misc cleanups and improvements in allowing to pass interface name via cmdline for xdp1 BPF example, from Matteo. 11) Fix a potential segfault in BPF sample loader's kprobes handling, from Daniel T. 12) Fix SPDX license in libbpf's README.rst, from Andrey. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-11selftests/bpf: use proper type when passing prog_typeStanislav Fomichev1-4/+4
Use bpf_prog_type instead of bpf_map_type when passing prog_type. -Wenum-conversion might be unhappy about it: error: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum bpf_map_type' to different enumeration type 'enum bpf_prog_type' Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-10tools/bpf: rename *_info_cnt to nr_*_infoYonghong Song1-30/+30
Rename all occurances of *_info_cnt field access to nr_*_info in tools directory. The local variables finfo_cnt, linfo_cnt and jited_linfo_cnt in function do_dump() of tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c are also changed to nr_finfo, nr_linfo and nr_jited_linfo to keep naming convention consistent. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-10selftests/bpf: add missing pointer dereference for map stacktrace fixupStanislav Fomichev1-1/+1
I get a segfault without it, other fixups always do dereference, and without dereference I don't understand how it can ever work. Fixes: 7c85c448e7d74 ("selftests/bpf: test_verifier, check bpf_map_lookup_elem access in bpf prog") Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-10bpf: relax verifier restriction on BPF_MOV | BPF_ALUJiong Wang1-0/+13
Currently, the destination register is marked as unknown for 32-bit sub-register move (BPF_MOV | BPF_ALU) whenever the source register type is SCALAR_VALUE. This is too conservative that some valid cases will be rejected. Especially, this may turn a constant scalar value into unknown value that could break some assumptions of verifier. For example, test_l4lb_noinline.c has the following C code: struct real_definition *dst 1: if (!get_packet_dst(&dst, &pckt, vip_info, is_ipv6)) 2: return TC_ACT_SHOT; 3: 4: if (dst->flags & F_IPV6) { get_packet_dst is responsible for initializing "dst" into valid pointer and return true (1), otherwise return false (0). The compiled instruction sequence using alu32 will be: 412: (54) (u32) r7 &= (u32) 1 413: (bc) (u32) r0 = (u32) r7 414: (95) exit insn 413, a BPF_MOV | BPF_ALU, however will turn r0 into unknown value even r7 contains SCALAR_VALUE 1. This causes trouble when verifier is walking the code path that hasn't initialized "dst" inside get_packet_dst, for which case 0 is returned and we would then expect verifier concluding line 1 in the above C code pass the "if" check, therefore would skip fall through path starting at line 4. Now, because r0 returned from callee has became unknown value, so verifier won't skip analyzing path starting at line 4 and "dst->flags" requires dereferencing the pointer "dst" which actually hasn't be initialized for this path. This patch relaxed the code marking sub-register move destination. For a SCALAR_VALUE, it is safe to just copy the value from source then truncate it into 32-bit. A unit test also included to demonstrate this issue. This test will fail before this patch. This relaxation could let verifier skipping more paths for conditional comparison against immediate. It also let verifier recording a more accurate/strict value for one register at one state, if this state end up with going through exit without rejection and it is used for state comparison later, then it is possible an inaccurate/permissive value is better. So the real impact on verifier processed insn number is complex. But in all, without this fix, valid program could be rejected. >From real benchmarking on kernel selftests and Cilium bpf tests, there is no impact on processed instruction number when tests ares compiled with default compilation options. There is slightly improvements when they are compiled with -mattr=+alu32 after this patch. Also, test_xdp_noinline/-mattr=+alu32 now passed verification. It is rejected before this fix. Insn processed before/after this patch: default -mattr=+alu32 Kernel selftest === test_xdp.o 371/371 369/369 test_l4lb.o 6345/6345 5623/5623 test_xdp_noinline.o 2971/2971 rejected/2727 test_tcp_estates.o 429/429 430/430 Cilium bpf === bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o: 2085/2085 1685/1687 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o: 2287/2287 1986/1982 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o: 690/690 622/622 bpf_lxc.o: 95033/95033 N/A bpf_netdev.o: 7245/7245 N/A bpf_overlay.o: 2898/2898 3085/2947 NOTE: - bpf_lxc.o and bpf_netdev.o compiled by -mattr=+alu32 are rejected by verifier due to another issue inside verifier on supporting alu32 binary. - Each cilium bpf program could generate several processed insn number, above number is sum of them. v1->v2: - Restrict the change on SCALAR_VALUE. - Update benchmark numbers on Cilium bpf tests. Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-09Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netDavid S. Miller4-21/+382
Several conflicts, seemingly all over the place. I used Stephen Rothwell's sample resolutions for many of these, if not just to double check my own work, so definitely the credit largely goes to him. The NFP conflict consisted of a bug fix (moving operations past the rhashtable operation) while chaning the initial argument in the function call in the moved code. The net/dsa/master.c conflict had to do with a bug fix intermixing of making dsa_master_set_mtu() static with the fixing of the tagging attribute location. cls_flower had a conflict because the dup reject fix from Or overlapped with the addition of port range classifiction. __set_phy_supported()'s conflict was relatively easy to resolve because Andrew fixed it in both trees, so it was just a matter of taking the net-next copy. Or at least I think it was :-) Joe Stringer's fix to the handling of netns id 0 in bpf_sk_lookup() intermixed with changes on how the sdif and caller_net are calculated in these code paths in net-next. The remaining BPF conflicts were largely about the addition of the __bpf_md_ptr stuff in 'net' overlapping with adjustments and additions to the relevant data structure where the MD pointer macros are used. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-09media: bpf: add bpf function to report mouse movementSean Young4-20/+53
Some IR remotes have a directional pad or other pointer-like thing that can be used as a mouse. Make it possible to decode these types of IR protocols in BPF. Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-09bpf: Add unit tests for bpf_line_infoMartin KaFai Lau1-17/+580
Add unit tests for bpf_line_info for both BPF_PROG_LOAD and BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD. jit enabled: [root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_btf -k 0 BTF prog info raw test[5] (line_info (No subprog)): OK BTF prog info raw test[6] (line_info (No subprog. insn_off >= prog->len)): OK BTF prog info raw test[7] (line_info (No subprog. zero tailing line_info): OK BTF prog info raw test[8] (line_info (No subprog. nonzero tailing line_info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[9] (line_info (subprog)): OK BTF prog info raw test[10] (line_info (subprog + func_info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[11] (line_info (subprog. missing 1st func line info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[12] (line_info (subprog. missing 2nd func line info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[13] (line_info (subprog. unordered insn offset)): OK jit disabled: BTF prog info raw test[5] (line_info (No subprog)): not jited. skipping jited_line_info check. OK BTF prog info raw test[6] (line_info (No subprog. insn_off >= prog->len)): OK BTF prog info raw test[7] (line_info (No subprog. zero tailing line_info): not jited. skipping jited_line_info check. OK BTF prog info raw test[8] (line_info (No subprog. nonzero tailing line_info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[9] (line_info (subprog)): not jited. skipping jited_line_info check. OK BTF prog info raw test[10] (line_info (subprog + func_info)): not jited. skipping jited_line_info check. OK BTF prog info raw test[11] (line_info (subprog. missing 1st func line info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[12] (line_info (subprog. missing 2nd func line info)): OK BTF prog info raw test[13] (line_info (subprog. unordered insn offset)): OK Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-09bpf: Refactor and bug fix in test_func_type in test_btf.cMartin KaFai Lau1-86/+125
1) bpf_load_program_xattr() is absorbing the EBIG error which makes testing this case impossible. It is replaced with a direct syscall(__NR_bpf, BPF_PROG_LOAD,...). 2) The test_func_type() is renamed to test_info_raw() to prepare for the new line_info test in the next patch. 3) The bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() testing for func_info is refactored to test_get_finfo(). A new test_get_linfo() will be added in the next patch for testing line_info purpose. 4) The test->func_info_cnt is checked instead of a static value "2". 5) Remove unnecessary "\n" in error message. 6) Adding back info_raw_test_num to the cmd arg such that a specific test case can be tested, like all other existing tests. 7) Fix a bug in handling expected_prog_load_failure. A test could pass even if prog_fd != -1 while expected_prog_load_failure is true. 8) The min rec_size check should be < 8 instead of < 4. Fixes: 4798c4ba3ba9 ("tools/bpf: extends test_btf to test load/retrieve func_type info") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-07selftests/bpf: use thoff instead of nhoff in BPF flow dissectorStanislav Fomichev1-19/+17
We are returning thoff from the flow dissector, not the nhoff. Pass thoff along with nhoff to the bpf program (initially thoff == nhoff) and expect flow dissector amend/return thoff, not nhoff. This avoids confusion, when by the time bpf flow dissector exits, nhoff == thoff, which doesn't make much sense. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-07selftests: bpf: update testcases for BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSHJiong Wang1-4/+25
"arsh32 on imm" and "arsh32 on reg" now are accepted. Also added two new testcases to make sure arsh32 won't be treated as arsh64 during interpretation or JIT code-gen for which case the high bits will be moved into low halve that the testcases could catch them. Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-05bpf: Expect !info.func_info and insn_off name changes in test_btf/libbpf/bpftoolMartin KaFai Lau1-1/+7
Similar to info.jited_*, info.func_info could be 0 if bpf_dump_raw_ok() == false. This patch makes changes to test_btf and bpftool to expect info.func_info could be 0. This patch also makes the needed changes for s/insn_offset/insn_off/. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-04bpf: improve verifier branch analysisAlexei Starovoitov1-2/+2
pathological bpf programs may try to force verifier to explode in the number of branch states: 20: (d5) if r1 s<= 0x24000028 goto pc+0 21: (b5) if r0 <= 0xe1fa20 goto pc+2 22: (d5) if r1 s<= 0x7e goto pc+0 23: (b5) if r0 <= 0xe880e000 goto pc+0 24: (c5) if r0 s< 0x2100ecf4 goto pc+0 25: (d5) if r1 s<= 0xe880e000 goto pc+1 26: (c5) if r0 s< 0xf4041810 goto pc+0 27: (d5) if r1 s<= 0x1e007e goto pc+0 28: (b5) if r0 <= 0xe86be000 goto pc+0 29: (07) r0 += 16614 30: (c5) if r0 s< 0x6d0020da goto pc+0 31: (35) if r0 >= 0x2100ecf4 goto pc+0 Teach verifier to recognize always taken and always not taken branches. This analysis is already done for == and != comparison. Expand it to all other branches. It also helps real bpf programs to be verified faster: before after bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 2003 1940 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3173 3089 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1080 1065 bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 29584 28052 bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 36916 35487 bpf_netdev.o 11188 10864 bpf_overlay.o 6679 6643 bpf_lcx_jit.o 39555 38437 Reported-by: Anatoly Trosinenko <anatoly.trosinenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-04selftests: add a test for bpf_prog_test_run_xattrLorenz Bauer1-1/+54
Make sure that bpf_prog_test_run_xattr returns the correct length and that the kernel respects the output size hint. Also check that errno indicates ENOSPC if there is a short output buffer given. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-03bpf: allow BPF read access to qdisc pkt_lenPetar Penkov1-0/+32
The pkt_len field in qdisc_skb_cb stores the skb length as it will appear on the wire after segmentation. For byte accounting, this value is more accurate than skb->len. It is computed on entry to the TC layer, so only valid there. Allow read access to this field from BPF tc classifier and action programs. The implementation is analogous to tc_classid, aside from restricting to read access. To distinguish it from skb->len and self-describe export as wire_len. Changes v1->v2 - Rename pkt_len to wire_len Signed-off-by: Petar Penkov <ppenkov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Dumitrescu <vladum@google.com> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-11-30bpf: Apply F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to more ACCEPT test cases.David Miller1-0/+17
If a testcase has alignment problems but is expected to be ACCEPT, verify it using F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS too. Maybe in the future if we add some architecture specific code to elide the unaligned memory access warnings during the test, we can execute these as well. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-30bpf: Make more use of 'any' alignment in test_verifier.cDavid Miller1-0/+44
Use F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS in more tests where the expected result is REJECT. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-30bpf: Adjust F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS handling in test_verifier.cDavid Miller1-18/+24
Make it set the flag argument to bpf_verify_program() which will relax the alignment restrictions. Now all such test cases will go properly through the verifier even on inefficient unaligned access architectures. On inefficient unaligned access architectures do not try to run such programs, instead mark the test case as passing but annotate the result similarly to how it is done now in the presence of this flag. So, we get complete full coverage for all REJECT test cases, and at least verifier level coverage for ACCEPT test cases. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-30bpf: Add BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT.David Miller2-3/+4
Often we want to write tests cases that check things like bad context offset accesses. And one way to do this is to use an odd offset on, for example, a 32-bit load. This unfortunately triggers the alignment checks first on platforms that do not set CONFIG_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. So the test case see the alignment failure rather than what it was testing for. It is often not completely possible to respect the original intention of the test, or even test the same exact thing, while solving the alignment issue. Another option could have been to check the alignment after the context and other validations are performed by the verifier, but that is a non-trivial change to the verifier. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-30bpf: Fix verifier log string check for bad alignment.David Miller1-1/+1
The message got changed a lot time ago. This was responsible for 36 test case failures on sparc64. Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-30bpf: Support sk lookup in netns with id 0Joe Stringer2-11/+11
David Ahern and Nicolas Dichtel report that the handling of the netns id 0 is incorrect for the BPF socket lookup helpers: rather than finding the netns with id 0, it is resolving to the current netns. This renders the netns_id 0 inaccessible. To fix this, adjust the API for the netns to treat all negative s32 values as a lookup in the current netns (including u64 values which when truncated to s32 become negative), while any values with a positive value in the signed 32-bit integer space would result in a lookup for a socket in the netns corresponding to that id. As before, if the netns with that ID does not exist, no socket will be found. Any netns outside of these ranges will fail to find a corresponding socket, as those values are reserved for future usage. Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz> Acked-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Acked-by: Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-30bpf: Fix verifier log string check for bad alignment.David Miller1-1/+1
The message got changed a lot time ago. This was responsible for 36 test case failures on sparc64. Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-29Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller6-53/+192
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== bpf-next 2018-11-30 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. (Getting out bit earlier this time to pull in a dependency from bpf.) The main changes are: 1) Add libbpf ABI versioning and document API naming conventions as well as ABI versioning process, from Andrey. 2) Add a new sk_msg_pop_data() helper for sk_msg based BPF programs that is used in conjunction with sk_msg_push_data() for adding / removing meta data to the msg data, from John. 3) Optimize convert_bpf_ld_abs() for 0 offset and fix various lib and testsuite build failures on 32 bit, from David. 4) Make BPF prog dump for !JIT identical to how we dump subprogs when JIT is in use, from Yonghong. 5) Rename btf_get_from_id() to make it more conform with libbpf API naming conventions, from Martin. 6) Add a missing BPF kselftest config item, from Naresh. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-28Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netDavid S. Miller2-1/+23
Trivial conflict in net/core/filter.c, a locally computed 'sdif' is now an argument to the function. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-11-28bpf: Fix various lib and testsuite build failures on 32-bit.David Miller1-5/+5
Cannot cast a u64 to a pointer on 32-bit without an intervening (long) cast otherwise GCC warns. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-28tools/bpf: add addition type tests to test_btfYonghong Song1-0/+361
The following additional unit testcases are added to test_btf: ... BTF raw test[42] (typedef (invalid name, name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[43] (typedef (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK BTF raw test[44] (ptr type (invalid name, name_off <> 0)): OK BTF raw test[45] (volatile type (invalid name, name_off <> 0)): OK BTF raw test[46] (const type (invalid name, name_off <> 0)): OK BTF raw test[47] (restrict type (invalid name, name_off <> 0)): OK BTF raw test[48] (fwd type (invalid name, name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[49] (fwd type (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK BTF raw test[50] (array type (invalid name, name_off <> 0)): OK BTF raw test[51] (struct type (name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[52] (struct type (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK BTF raw test[53] (struct member (name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[54] (struct member (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK BTF raw test[55] (enum type (name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[56] (enum type (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK BTF raw test[57] (enum member (invalid name, name_off = 0)): OK BTF raw test[58] (enum member (invalid name, invalid identifier)): OK ... Fixes: c0fa1b6c3efc ("bpf: btf: Add BTF tests") Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-28tools/bpf: fix two test_btf unit test casesMartin KaFai Lau1-7/+7
There are two unit test cases, which should encode TYPEDEF type, but instead encode PTR type. The error is flagged out after enforcing name checking in the previous patch. Fixes: c0fa1b6c3efc ("bpf: btf: Add BTF tests") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-11-28selftests/bpf: add config fragment CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLSNaresh Kamboju1-0/+1
CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS=y is required for get_cgroup_id_user test case this test reads a file from debug trace path /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep/id Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-11-28bpf: test_sockmap, add options for msg_pop_data() helperJohn Fastabend2-17/+180
Similar to msg_pull_data and msg_push_data add a set of options to have msg_pop_data() exercised. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>