From 124579de462e6c232c4c321c3ec1ed81964cf78b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jacob Keller Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 13:17:27 -0700 Subject: fm10k: don't use BIT() macro where the value isn't a bitmask The FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD is really just using a bitshift as a power of 2 operation in an efficient manner. We shouldn't represent this as a BIT() because that obscures the intention of the operation. Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller Tested-by: Krishneil Singh Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h index fcf106e545c5..e98b86bf0ca1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k.h @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static inline u16 fm10k_desc_unused(struct fm10k_ring *ring) (&(((union fm10k_rx_desc *)((R)->desc))[i])) #define FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR 14 -#define FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD BIT(FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR) +#define FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD (1u << FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR) /* Tx Descriptors needed, worst case */ #define TXD_USE_COUNT(S) DIV_ROUND_UP((S), FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD) -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b