From 6cb2b08ff92460290979de4be91363e5d1b6cec1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Kosina Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:59:54 +0200 Subject: x86/pti: Don't report XenPV as vulnerable Xen PV domain kernel is not by design affected by meltdown as it's enforcing split CR3 itself. Let's not report such systems as "Vulnerable" in sysfs (we're also already forcing PTI to off in X86_HYPER_XEN_PV cases); the security of the system ultimately depends on presence of mitigation in the Hypervisor, which can't be easily detected from DomU; let's report that. Reported-and-tested-by: Mike Latimer Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Juergen Gross Cc: Borislav Petkov Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YFH.7.76.1806180959080.6203@cbobk.fhfr.pm [ Merge the user-visible string into a single line. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index cd0fda1fff6d..404df26b7de8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include static void __init spectre_v2_select_mitigation(void); static void __init ssb_select_mitigation(void); @@ -664,6 +665,9 @@ static ssize_t cpu_show_common(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI)) return sprintf(buf, "Mitigation: PTI\n"); + if (hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_XEN_PV)) + return sprintf(buf, "Unknown (XEN PV detected, hypervisor mitigation required)\n"); + break; case X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V1: -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From eab6870fee877258122a042bfd99ee7908c40280 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Williams Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:13:48 -0700 Subject: x86/spectre_v1: Disable compiler optimizations over array_index_mask_nospec() Mark Rutland noticed that GCC optimization passes have the potential to elide necessary invocations of the array_index_mask_nospec() instruction sequence, so mark the asm() volatile. Mark explains: "The volatile will inhibit *some* cases where the compiler could lift the array_index_nospec() call out of a branch, e.g. where there are multiple invocations of array_index_nospec() with the same arguments: if (idx < foo) { idx1 = array_idx_nospec(idx, foo) do_something(idx1); } < some other code > if (idx < foo) { idx2 = array_idx_nospec(idx, foo); do_something_else(idx2); } ... since the compiler can determine that the two invocations yield the same result, and reuse the first result (likely the same register as idx was in originally) for the second branch, effectively re-writing the above as: if (idx < foo) { idx = array_idx_nospec(idx, foo); do_something(idx); } < some other code > if (idx < foo) { do_something_else(idx); } ... if we don't take the first branch, then speculatively take the second, we lose the nospec protection. There's more info on volatile asm in the GCC docs: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#Volatile " Reported-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Acked-by: Mark Rutland Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Cc: Peter Zijlstra Fixes: babdde2698d4 ("x86: Implement array_index_mask_nospec") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/152838798950.14521.4893346294059739135.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h index 042b5e892ed1..14de0432d288 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_mask_nospec(unsigned long index, { unsigned long mask; - asm ("cmp %1,%2; sbb %0,%0;" + asm volatile ("cmp %1,%2; sbb %0,%0;" :"=r" (mask) :"g"(size),"r" (index) :"cc"); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b