From 83b4b19551411c83bbcf677718ab5d9f60d982f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kai Ye Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 15:41:05 +0800 Subject: Bluetooth: smp: Use the correct print format According to Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst, Use the correct print format. Printing an unsigned int value should use %u instead of %d. Otherwise printk() might end up displaying negative numbers. Signed-off-by: Kai Ye Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann --- net/bluetooth/smp.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c index 6197f8ae53ab..b9413a78993a 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c @@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth, memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk)); clear_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->flags); - bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "auth:%d lcl:%d rem:%d", auth, local_io, + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "auth:%u lcl:%u rem:%u", auth, local_io, remote_io); /* If neither side wants MITM, either "just" confirm an incoming @@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth, get_random_bytes(&passkey, sizeof(passkey)); passkey %= 1000000; put_unaligned_le32(passkey, smp->tk); - bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "PassKey: %d", passkey); + bt_dev_dbg(hcon->hdev, "PassKey: %u", passkey); set_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->flags); } @@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@ int smp_user_confirm_reply(struct hci_conn *hcon, u16 mgmt_op, __le32 passkey) case MGMT_OP_USER_PASSKEY_REPLY: value = le32_to_cpu(passkey); memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk)); - bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "PassKey: %d", value); + bt_dev_dbg(conn->hcon->hdev, "PassKey: %u", value); put_unaligned_le32(value, smp->tk); fallthrough; case MGMT_OP_USER_CONFIRM_REPLY: -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b