From 9adfac6d730db5e9c4c294798f5f191b621f8bc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Coddington Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 10:45:46 -0400 Subject: lockd: Remove lm_compare_owner and lm_owner_key Now that the NLM server allocates an nlm_lockowner for fl_owner, there's no need for special hashing or comparison. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields --- fs/lockd/svclock.c | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c index 34c6ee85274e..637c50687fd7 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c @@ -788,25 +788,7 @@ nlmsvc_notify_blocked(struct file_lock *fl) printk(KERN_WARNING "lockd: notification for unknown block!\n"); } -static int nlmsvc_same_owner(struct file_lock *fl1, struct file_lock *fl2) -{ - return fl1->fl_owner == fl2->fl_owner && fl1->fl_pid == fl2->fl_pid; -} - -/* - * Since NLM uses two "keys" for tracking locks, we need to hash them down - * to one for the blocked_hash. Here, we're just xor'ing the host address - * with the pid in order to create a key value for picking a hash bucket. - */ -static unsigned long -nlmsvc_owner_key(struct file_lock *fl) -{ - return (unsigned long)fl->fl_owner ^ (unsigned long)fl->fl_pid; -} - const struct lock_manager_operations nlmsvc_lock_operations = { - .lm_compare_owner = nlmsvc_same_owner, - .lm_owner_key = nlmsvc_owner_key, .lm_notify = nlmsvc_notify_blocked, .lm_grant = nlmsvc_grant_deferred, }; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b