From f77af637f29da49193283e883a9b18406fb45d3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Federico Vaga Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 01:35:19 +0100 Subject: doc:process: add links where missing Some documents are refering to others without links. With this patch I add those missing links. This patch affects only documents under process/ and labels where necessary. Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst index c418c5d6cae4..4213e580f273 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst @@ -9,9 +9,10 @@ kernel. Unsurprisingly, the kernel development community has evolved a set of conventions and procedures which are used in the posting of patches; following them will make life much easier for everybody involved. This document will attempt to cover these expectations in reasonable detail; -more information can also be found in the files process/submitting-patches.rst, -process/submitting-drivers.rst, and process/submit-checklist.rst in the kernel -documentation directory. +more information can also be found in the files +:ref:`Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst `, +:ref:`Documentation/process/submitting-drivers.rst ` +and :ref:`Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst `. When to post @@ -198,8 +199,10 @@ pass it to diff with the "-X" option. The tags mentioned above are used to describe how various developers have been associated with the development of this patch. They are described in -detail in the process/submitting-patches.rst document; what follows here is a -brief summary. Each of these lines has the format: +detail in +the :ref:`Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst ` +document; what follows here is a brief summary. Each of these lines has +the format: :: @@ -210,8 +213,8 @@ The tags in common use are: - Signed-off-by: this is a developer's certification that he or she has the right to submit the patch for inclusion into the kernel. It is an agreement to the Developer's Certificate of Origin, the full text of - which can be found in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst. Code - without a proper signoff cannot be merged into the mainline. + which can be found in :ref:`Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst ` + Code without a proper signoff cannot be merged into the mainline. - Co-developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer along with the original author. This is useful at times when multiple @@ -226,7 +229,7 @@ The tags in common use are: it to work. - Reviewed-by: the named developer has reviewed the patch for correctness; - see the reviewer's statement in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst + see the reviewer's statement in :ref:`Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst ` for more detail. - Reported-by: names a user who reported a problem which is fixed by this @@ -253,8 +256,8 @@ take care of: be examined in any detail. If there is any doubt at all, mail the patch to yourself and convince yourself that it shows up intact. - Documentation/process/email-clients.rst has some helpful hints on making - specific mail clients work for sending patches. + :ref:`Documentation/process/email-clients.rst ` has some + helpful hints on making specific mail clients work for sending patches. - Are you sure your patch is free of silly mistakes? You should always run patches through scripts/checkpatch.pl and address the complaints it -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b