From a28ebea2adc4a2bef5989a5a181ec238f59fbcad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoffer Dall Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 19:13:01 +0200 Subject: KVM: Protect device ops->create and list_add with kvm->lock MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit KVM devices were manipulating list data structures without any form of synchronization, and some implementations of the create operations also suffered from a lack of synchronization. Now when we've split the xics create operation into create and init, we can hold the kvm->lock mutex while calling the create operation and when manipulating the devices list. The error path in the generic code gets slightly ugly because we have to take the mutex again and delete the device from the list, but holding the mutex during anon_inode_getfd or releasing/locking the mutex in the common non-error path seemed wrong. Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář --- arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/kvm') diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c index d94bb9093ead..75f130ef6504 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c @@ -1009,9 +1009,13 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, switch (ioctl) { case KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP: { + int ret; if (!vgic_present) return -ENXIO; - return kvm_vgic_create(kvm, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2); + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + ret = kvm_vgic_create(kvm, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + return ret; } case KVM_ARM_SET_DEVICE_ADDR: { struct kvm_arm_device_addr dev_addr; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b