From 61f77eda9bbf0d2e922197ed2dcf88638a639ce5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Naoya Horiguchi Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:25:15 -0800 Subject: mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent code around follow_huge_* Currently we have many duplicates in definitions around follow_huge_addr(), follow_huge_pmd(), and follow_huge_pud(), so this patch tries to remove the m. The basic idea is to put the default implementation for these functions in mm/hugetlb.c as weak symbols (regardless of CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETL B), and to implement arch-specific code only when the arch needs it. For follow_huge_addr(), only powerpc and ia64 have their own implementation, and in all other architectures this function just returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL). So this patch sets returning ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) as default. As for follow_huge_(pmd|pud)(), if (pmd|pud)_huge() is implemented to always return 0 in your architecture (like in ia64 or sparc,) it's never called (the callsite is optimized away) no matter how implemented it is. So in such architectures, we don't need arch-specific implementation. In some architecture (like mips, s390 and tile,) their current arch-specific follow_huge_(pmd|pud)() are effectively identical with the common code, so this patch lets these architecture use the common code. One exception is metag, where pmd_huge() could return non-zero but it expects follow_huge_pmd() to always return NULL. This means that we need arch-specific implementation which returns NULL. This behavior looks strange to me (because non-zero pmd_huge() implies that the architecture supports PMD-based hugepage, so follow_huge_pmd() can/should return some relevant value,) but that's beyond this cleanup patch, so let's keep it. Justification of non-trivial changes: - in s390, follow_huge_pmd() checks !MACHINE_HAS_HPAGE at first, and this patch removes the check. This is OK because we can assume MACHINE_HAS_HPAGE is true when follow_huge_pmd() can be called (note that pmd_huge() has the same check and always returns 0 for !MACHINE_HAS_HPAGE.) - in s390 and mips, we use HPAGE_MASK instead of PMD_MASK as done in common code. This patch forces these archs use PMD_MASK, but it's OK because they are identical in both archs. In s390, both of HPAGE_SHIFT and PMD_SHIFT are 20. In mips, HPAGE_SHIFT is defined as (PAGE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT - 3) and PMD_SHIFT is define as (PAGE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT + PTE_ORDER - 3), but PTE_ORDER is always 0, so these are identical. Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi Acked-by: Hugh Dickins Cc: James Hogan Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Luiz Capitulino Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Steve Capper Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 20 -------------------- 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c') diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c index 3c80d2e38f03..210ffede0153 100644 --- a/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c +++ b/arch/s390/mm/hugetlbpage.c @@ -192,12 +192,6 @@ int huge_pmd_unshare(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long *addr, pte_t *ptep) return 0; } -struct page *follow_huge_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, - int write) -{ - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); -} - int pmd_huge(pmd_t pmd) { if (!MACHINE_HAS_HPAGE) @@ -210,17 +204,3 @@ int pud_huge(pud_t pud) { return 0; } - -struct page *follow_huge_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, - pmd_t *pmdp, int write) -{ - struct page *page; - - if (!MACHINE_HAS_HPAGE) - return NULL; - - page = pmd_page(*pmdp); - if (page) - page += ((address & ~HPAGE_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT); - return page; -} -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b