From 582b4e55403e053d8a48ff687a05174da9cc3fb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerald Schaefer Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:56:42 +0100 Subject: s390/mm: fix panic in gup_fast on large pud On s390 there currently is no implementation of pud_write(). That was ok as long as we had our own implementation of get_user_pages_fast() which checked for pud protection by testing the bit directly w/o using pud_write(). The other callers of pud_write() are not reachable on s390. After commit 1a42010cdc26 ("s390/mm: convert to the generic get_user_pages_fast code") we use the generic get_user_pages_fast(), which does call pud_write() in pud_access_permitted() for FOLL_WRITE access on a large pud. Without an s390 specific pud_write(), the generic version is called, which contains a BUG() statement to remind us that we don't have a proper implementation. This results in a kernel panic. Fix this by providing an implementation of pud_write(). Cc: # 5.2+ Fixes: 1a42010cdc26 ("s390/mm: convert to the generic get_user_pages_fast code") Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik --- arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'arch/s390') diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h index 137a3920ca36..6d7c3b7e9281 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -752,6 +752,12 @@ static inline int pmd_write(pmd_t pmd) return (pmd_val(pmd) & _SEGMENT_ENTRY_WRITE) != 0; } +#define pud_write pud_write +static inline int pud_write(pud_t pud) +{ + return (pud_val(pud) & _REGION3_ENTRY_WRITE) != 0; +} + static inline int pmd_dirty(pmd_t pmd) { return (pmd_val(pmd) & _SEGMENT_ENTRY_DIRTY) != 0; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b