From 945626db0961d8388543b2c96b6f16df57947392 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 12:51:27 -0500 Subject: sparc64: Use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() instead of curr_ret_stack The structure of the ret_stack array on the task struct is going to change, and accessing it directly via the curr_ret_stack index will no longer give the ret_stack entry that holds the return address. To access that, architectures must now use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() to get the associated ret_stack that matches the saved return address. Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c') diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c index 47c871394ccb..6de7c684c29f 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -1767,9 +1767,11 @@ void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, perf_callchain_store(entry, pc); #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER if ((pc + 8UL) == (unsigned long) &return_to_handler) { - int index = current->curr_ret_stack; - if (current->ret_stack && index >= graph) { - pc = current->ret_stack[index - graph].ret; + struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack; + ret_stack = ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(current, + graph); + if (ret_stack) { + pc = ret_stack->ret; perf_callchain_store(entry, pc); graph++; } -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b