From 1cce76c2ac60df40b02bf747982fb3f00e68f50a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rusty Russell Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:39:53 -0800 Subject: [CPUFREQ] use an enum for speedstep processor identification The "unsigned int processor" everywhere confused Rusty, leading to breakage when he passed in smp_processor_id(). Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Dave Jones --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c index befea088e4f5..04d73c114e49 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-smi.c @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static int smi_cmd; static unsigned int smi_sig; /* info about the processor */ -static unsigned int speedstep_processor; +static enum speedstep_processor speedstep_processor; /* * There are only two frequency states for each processor. Values -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b