From 60735b6362f29b52b5635a2dfa9ab5ad39948345 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tao Ma Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:50:40 +0200 Subject: block: Remove the extra check in queue_requests_store In queue_requests_store, the code looks like if (rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC] >= q->nr_requests) { blk_set_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_SYNC); } else if (rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC]+1 <= q->nr_requests) { blk_clear_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_SYNC); wake_up(&rl->wait[BLK_RW_SYNC]); } If we don't satify the situation of "if", we can get that rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC} < q->nr_quests. It is the same as rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC]+1 <= q->nr_requests. All the "else" should satisfy the "else if" check so it isn't needed actually. Signed-off-by: Tao Ma Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/blk-sysfs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'block') diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c index 5d696adbc4dc..bd236313f35d 100644 --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c @@ -66,14 +66,14 @@ queue_requests_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, size_t count) if (rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC] >= q->nr_requests) { blk_set_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_SYNC); - } else if (rl->count[BLK_RW_SYNC]+1 <= q->nr_requests) { + } else { blk_clear_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_SYNC); wake_up(&rl->wait[BLK_RW_SYNC]); } if (rl->count[BLK_RW_ASYNC] >= q->nr_requests) { blk_set_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_ASYNC); - } else if (rl->count[BLK_RW_ASYNC]+1 <= q->nr_requests) { + } else { blk_clear_queue_full(q, BLK_RW_ASYNC); wake_up(&rl->wait[BLK_RW_ASYNC]); } -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b