From 0dc36888d4422140f9eaf50f24953ec109f750a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:34:43 -0500 Subject: libata: rename ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* to ATAPI_PROT_* ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are ugly and naming schemes between ATA_PROT_* and ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are inconsistent causing confusion. Rename them to ATAPI_PROT_* and make them consistent with ATA counterpart. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c') diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c b/drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c index 323c087e8cc1..96e614a1c169 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static struct ata_port_operations inic_port_ops = { }; static struct ata_port_info inic_port_info = { - /* For some reason, ATA_PROT_ATAPI is broken on this + /* For some reason, ATAPI_PROT_PIO is broken on this * controller, and no, PIO_POLLING does't fix it. It somehow * manages to report the wrong ireason and ignoring ireason * results in machine lock up. Tell libata to always prefer -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b