From 7862840219058436b80029a0263fd1ef065fb1b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Bottomley Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 11:10:57 -0700 Subject: tpm: Fix TIS locality timeout problems It has been reported that some TIS based TPMs are giving unexpected errors when using the O_NONBLOCK path of the TPM device. The problem is that some TPMs don't like it when you get and then relinquish a locality (as the tpm_try_get_ops()/tpm_put_ops() pair does) without sending a command. This currently happens all the time in the O_NONBLOCK write path. Fix this by moving the tpm_try_get_ops() further down the code to after the O_NONBLOCK determination is made. This is safe because the priv->buffer_mutex still protects the priv state being modified. BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206275 Fixes: d23d12484307 ("tpm: fix invalid locking in NONBLOCKING mode") Reported-by: Mario Limonciello Tested-by: Alex Guzman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c | 19 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/char') diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c index 87f449340202..1784530b8387 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c @@ -189,15 +189,6 @@ ssize_t tpm_common_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, goto out; } - /* atomic tpm command send and result receive. We only hold the ops - * lock during this period so that the tpm can be unregistered even if - * the char dev is held open. - */ - if (tpm_try_get_ops(priv->chip)) { - ret = -EPIPE; - goto out; - } - priv->response_length = 0; priv->response_read = false; *off = 0; @@ -211,11 +202,19 @@ ssize_t tpm_common_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) { priv->command_enqueued = true; queue_work(tpm_dev_wq, &priv->async_work); - tpm_put_ops(priv->chip); mutex_unlock(&priv->buffer_mutex); return size; } + /* atomic tpm command send and result receive. We only hold the ops + * lock during this period so that the tpm can be unregistered even if + * the char dev is held open. + */ + if (tpm_try_get_ops(priv->chip)) { + ret = -EPIPE; + goto out; + } + ret = tpm_dev_transmit(priv->chip, priv->space, priv->data_buffer, sizeof(priv->data_buffer)); tpm_put_ops(priv->chip); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From eac9347d932b96c09f089ac0673ebe588983e59b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Douglas Anderson Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 15:19:30 -0700 Subject: tpm_tis_spi: Don't send anything during flow control During flow control we are just reading from the TPM, yet our spi_xfer has the tx_buf and rx_buf both non-NULL which means we're requesting a full duplex transfer. SPI is always somewhat of a full duplex protocol anyway and in theory the other side shouldn't really be looking at what we're sending it during flow control, but it's still a bit ugly to be sending some "random" data when we shouldn't. The default tpm_tis_spi_flow_control() tries to address this by setting 'phy->iobuf[0] = 0'. This partially avoids the problem of sending "random" data, but since our tx_buf and rx_buf both point to the same place I believe there is the potential of us sending the TPM's previous byte back to it if we hit the retry loop. Another flow control implementation, cr50_spi_flow_control(), doesn't address this at all. Let's clean this up and just make the tx_buf NULL before we call flow_control(). Not only does this ensure that we're not sending any "random" bytes but it also possibly could make the SPI controller behave in a slightly more optimal way. NOTE: no actual observed problems are fixed by this patch--it's was just made based on code inspection. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/char') diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c index d96755935529..8d2c581a93c6 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c @@ -53,8 +53,6 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_flow_control(struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy, if ((phy->iobuf[3] & 0x01) == 0) { // handle SPI wait states - phy->iobuf[0] = 0; - for (i = 0; i < TPM_RETRY; i++) { spi_xfer->len = 1; spi_message_init(&m); @@ -104,6 +102,8 @@ int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len, if (ret < 0) goto exit; + /* Flow control transfers are receive only */ + spi_xfer.tx_buf = NULL; ret = phy->flow_control(phy, &spi_xfer); if (ret < 0) goto exit; @@ -113,9 +113,8 @@ int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len, spi_xfer.delay.value = 5; spi_xfer.delay.unit = SPI_DELAY_UNIT_USECS; - if (in) { - spi_xfer.tx_buf = NULL; - } else if (out) { + if (out) { + spi_xfer.tx_buf = phy->iobuf; spi_xfer.rx_buf = NULL; memcpy(phy->iobuf, out, transfer_len); out += transfer_len; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From ccf6fb858e17a8f8a914a1c6444d277cfedfeae6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vasily Averin Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:18:33 +0300 Subject: tpm_tis: extra chip->ops check on error path in tpm_tis_core_init Found by smatch: drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:1088 tpm_tis_core_init() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'chip->ops' (see line 979) 'chip->ops' is assigned in the beginning of function in tpmm_chip_alloc->tpm_chip_alloc and is used before first possible goto to error path. Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/char') diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c index 2435216bd10a..65ab1b027949 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c @@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq, return 0; out_err: - if ((chip->ops != NULL) && (chip->ops->clk_enable != NULL)) + if (chip->ops->clk_enable != NULL) chip->ops->clk_enable(chip, false); tpm_tis_remove(chip); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 82efeb161c090072ab493ab8c8f8a551727f586e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Binbin Zhou Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:00:38 +0800 Subject: tpm/st33zp24: fix spelling mistake "drescription" -> "description" Trivial fix, the spelling of "drescription" is incorrect in function comment. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Binbin Zhou Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c | 2 +- drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/spi.c | 4 ++-- drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/char') diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c index 35333b65acd1..7c617edff4ca 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/i2c.c @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int st33zp24_i2c_request_resources(struct i2c_client *client) /* * st33zp24_i2c_probe initialize the TPM device - * @param: client, the i2c_client drescription (TPM I2C description). + * @param: client, the i2c_client description (TPM I2C description). * @param: id, the i2c_device_id struct. * @return: 0 in case of success. * -1 in other case. diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/spi.c b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/spi.c index 26e09de50f1e..a75dafd39445 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/spi.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/spi.c @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int st33zp24_spi_request_resources(struct spi_device *dev) /* * st33zp24_spi_probe initialize the TPM device - * @param: dev, the spi_device drescription (TPM SPI description). + * @param: dev, the spi_device description (TPM SPI description). * @return: 0 in case of success. * or a negative value describing the error. */ @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int st33zp24_spi_probe(struct spi_device *dev) /* * st33zp24_spi_remove remove the TPM device - * @param: client, the spi_device drescription (TPM SPI description). + * @param: client, the spi_device description (TPM SPI description). * @return: 0 in case of success. */ static int st33zp24_spi_remove(struct spi_device *dev) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c index 37bb13f516be..4ec10ab5e576 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static const struct tpm_class_ops st33zp24_tpm = { /* * st33zp24_probe initialize the TPM device - * @param: client, the i2c_client drescription (TPM I2C description). + * @param: client, the i2c_client description (TPM I2C description). * @param: id, the i2c_device_id struct. * @return: 0 in case of success. * -1 in other case. -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 72d0556dca39f45eca6c4c085e9eb0fc70aec025 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Gibson Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:30:40 +1000 Subject: tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for ready buffer before probing for TPM2 attributes The tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl() call will result in TPM commands being issued, which will need the use of the internal command/response buffer. But, we're issuing this *before* we've waited to make sure that buffer is allocated. This can result in intermittent failures to probe if the hypervisor / TPM implementation doesn't respond quickly enough. I find it fails almost every time with an 8 vcpu guest under KVM with software emulated TPM. To fix it, just move the tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tlb() call after the existing code to wait for initialization, which will ensure the buffer is allocated. Fixes: 18b3670d79ae9 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: Add support for TPM2") Signed-off-by: David Gibson Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/char') diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c index 09fe45246b8c..994385bf37c0 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c @@ -683,13 +683,6 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev, if (rc) goto init_irq_cleanup; - if (!strcmp(id->compat, "IBM,vtpm20")) { - chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2; - rc = tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(chip); - if (rc) - goto init_irq_cleanup; - } - if (!wait_event_timeout(ibmvtpm->crq_queue.wq, ibmvtpm->rtce_buf != NULL, HZ)) { @@ -697,6 +690,13 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev, goto init_irq_cleanup; } + if (!strcmp(id->compat, "IBM,vtpm20")) { + chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2; + rc = tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(chip); + if (rc) + goto init_irq_cleanup; + } + return tpm_chip_register(chip); init_irq_cleanup: do { -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 7187bf7f6297a8cfc74512a4493e06028626482d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Douglas Anderson Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:20:01 -0700 Subject: tpm_tis_spi: Prefer async probe On a Chromebook I'm working on I noticed a big (~1 second) delay during bootup where nothing was happening. Right around this big delay there were messages about the TPM: [ 2.311352] tpm_tis_spi spi0.0: TPM ready IRQ confirmed on attempt 2 [ 3.332790] tpm_tis_spi spi0.0: Cr50 firmware version: ... I put a few printouts in and saw that tpm_tis_spi_init() (specifically tpm_chip_register() in that function) was taking the lion's share of this time, though ~115 ms of the time was in cr50_print_fw_version(). Let's make a one-line change to prefer async probe for tpm_tis_spi. There's no reason we need to block other drivers from probing while we load. NOTES: * It's possible that other hardware runs through the init sequence faster than Cr50 and this isn't such a big problem for them. However, even if they are faster they are still doing _some_ transfers over a SPI bus so this should benefit everyone even if to a lesser extent. * It's possible that there are extra delays in the code that could be optimized out. I didn't dig since once I enabled async probe they no longer impacted me. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'drivers/char') diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c index 8d2c581a93c6..3856f6ebcb34 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ static struct spi_driver tpm_tis_spi_driver = { .pm = &tpm_tis_pm, .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(of_tis_spi_match), .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(acpi_tis_spi_match), + .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS, }, .probe = tpm_tis_spi_driver_probe, .remove = tpm_tis_spi_remove, -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From e918e570415ced9898a51109000a3f39a6e03be5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 05:31:11 +0300 Subject: tpm_tis: Remove the HID IFX0102 Acer C720 running Linux v5.3 reports this in klog: tpm_tis: 1.2 TPM (device-id 0xB, rev-id 16) tpm tpm0: tpm_try_transmit: send(): error -5 tpm tpm0: A TPM error (-5) occurred attempting to determine the timeouts tpm_tis tpm_tis: Could not get TPM timeouts and durations tpm_tis 00:08: 1.2 TPM (device-id 0xB, rev-id 16) tpm tpm0: tpm_try_transmit: send(): error -5 tpm tpm0: A TPM error (-5) occurred attempting to determine the timeouts tpm_tis 00:08: Could not get TPM timeouts and durations ima: No TPM chip found, activating TPM-bypass! tpm_inf_pnp 00:08: Found TPM with ID IFX0102 % git --no-pager grep IFX0102 drivers/char/tpm drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c: {"IFX0102", 0}, drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c: {"IFX0102", 0}, /* Infineon */ Obviously IFX0102 was added to the HID table for the TCG TIS driver by mistake. Fixes: 93e1b7d42e1e ("[PATCH] tpm: add HID module parameter") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203877 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kylene Jo Hall Reported-by: Ferry Toth: Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/char') diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c index e7df342a317d..c58ea10fc92f 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c @@ -238,7 +238,6 @@ static int tpm_tis_pnp_init(struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev, static struct pnp_device_id tpm_pnp_tbl[] = { {"PNP0C31", 0}, /* TPM */ {"ATM1200", 0}, /* Atmel */ - {"IFX0102", 0}, /* Infineon */ {"BCM0101", 0}, /* Broadcom */ {"BCM0102", 0}, /* Broadcom */ {"NSC1200", 0}, /* National */ -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 786a2aa281f4c4ba424ea8b8ea1e85ab62c4a57c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 23:53:42 +0300 Subject: Revert commit e918e570415c ("tpm_tis: Remove the HID IFX0102") Removing IFX0102 from tpm_tis was not a right move because both tpm_tis and tpm_infineon use the same device ID. Revert the commit and add a remark about a bug caused by commit 93e1b7d42e1e ("[PATCH] tpm: add HID module parameter"). Fixes: e918e570415c ("tpm_tis: Remove the HID IFX0102") Reported-by: Peter Huewe Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) (limited to 'drivers/char') diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c index c58ea10fc92f..0b214963539d 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c @@ -235,9 +235,17 @@ static int tpm_tis_pnp_init(struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev, return tpm_tis_init(&pnp_dev->dev, &tpm_info); } +/* + * There is a known bug caused by 93e1b7d42e1e ("[PATCH] tpm: add HID module + * parameter"). This commit added IFX0102 device ID, which is also used by + * tpm_infineon but ignored to add quirks to probe which driver ought to be + * used. + */ + static struct pnp_device_id tpm_pnp_tbl[] = { {"PNP0C31", 0}, /* TPM */ {"ATM1200", 0}, /* Atmel */ + {"IFX0102", 0}, /* Infineon */ {"BCM0101", 0}, /* Broadcom */ {"BCM0102", 0}, /* Broadcom */ {"NSC1200", 0}, /* National */ -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 897c44f0bae574c5fb318c759b060bebf9dd6013 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Lobakin Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:09:33 +0000 Subject: virtio: virtio_console: add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() for rproc serial rproc_serial_id_table lacks an exposure to module devicetable, so when remoteproc firmware requests VIRTIO_ID_RPROC_SERIAL, no uevent is generated and no module autoloading occurs. Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() annotation and move the existing one for VIRTIO_ID_CONSOLE right to the table itself. Fixes: 1b6370463e88 ("virtio_console: Add support for remoteproc serial") Cc: # v3.8+ Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin Reviewed-by: Amit Shah Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/x7C_CbeJtoGMy258nwAXASYz3xgFMFpyzmUvOyZzRnQrgWCREBjaqBOpAUS7ol4NnZYvSVwmTsCG0Ohyfvta-ygw6HMHcoeKK0C3QFiAO_Q=@pm.me Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/char') diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c index 00c5e3acee46..ca691bce9791 100644 --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c @@ -2116,6 +2116,7 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = { { VIRTIO_ID_CONSOLE, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID }, { 0 }, }; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table); static unsigned int features[] = { VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_SIZE, @@ -2128,6 +2129,7 @@ static struct virtio_device_id rproc_serial_id_table[] = { #endif { 0 }, }; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, rproc_serial_id_table); static unsigned int rproc_serial_features[] = { }; @@ -2280,6 +2282,5 @@ static void __exit fini(void) module_init(init); module_exit(fini); -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio console driver"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b