From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c') diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c index 02fef6830e72..394e417414d3 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c @@ -562,12 +562,12 @@ static u64 arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem(void) */ u64 (*arch_timer_read_counter)(void) = arch_counter_get_cntvct; -static cycle_t arch_counter_read(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 arch_counter_read(struct clocksource *cs) { return arch_timer_read_counter(); } -static cycle_t arch_counter_read_cc(const struct cyclecounter *cc) +static u64 arch_counter_read_cc(const struct cyclecounter *cc) { return arch_timer_read_counter(); } -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b