From c337374bf23b88620bcc66a7a09f141cc640f548 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Wise Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 16:25:05 +0000 Subject: RDMA/cxgb4: Use completion objects for event blocking There exists a race condition when using wait_queue_head_t objects that are declared on the stack. This was being done in a few places where we are sending work requests to the FW and awaiting replies, but we don't have an endpoint structure with an embedded c4iw_wr_wait struct. So the code was allocating it locally on the stack. Bad design. The race is: 1) thread on cpuX declares the wait_queue_head_t on the stack, then posts a firmware WR with that wait object ptr as the cookie to be returned in the WR reply. This thread will proceed to block in wait_event_timeout() but before it does: 2) An interrupt runs on cpuY with the WR reply. fw6_msg() handles this and calls c4iw_wake_up(). c4iw_wake_up() sets the condition variable in the c4iw_wr_wait object to TRUE and will call wake_up(), but before it calls wake_up(): 3) The thread on cpuX calls c4iw_wait_for_reply(), which calls wait_event_timeout(). The wait_event_timeout() macro checks the condition variable and returns immediately since it is TRUE. So this thread never blocks/sleeps. The function then returns effectively deallocating the c4iw_wr_wait object that was on the stack. 4) So at this point cpuY has a pointer to the c4iw_wr_wait object that is no longer valid. Further its pointing to a stack frame that might now be in use by some other context/thread. So cpuY continues execution and calls wake_up() on a ptr to a wait object that as been effectively deallocated. This race, when it hits, can cause a crash in wake_up(), which I've seen under heavy stress. It can also corrupt the referenced stack which can cause any number of failures. The fix: Use struct completion, which supports on-stack declarations. Completions use a spinlock around setting the condition to true and the wake up so that steps 2 and 4 above are atomic and step 3 can never happen in-between. Signed-off-by: Steve Wise --- drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/iw_cxgb4.h | 18 +++++------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4') diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/iw_cxgb4.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/iw_cxgb4.h index 35d2a5dd9bb4..4f045375c8e2 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/iw_cxgb4.h +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/iw_cxgb4.h @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ #include #include #include -#include +#include #include #include #include @@ -131,28 +131,21 @@ static inline int c4iw_num_stags(struct c4iw_rdev *rdev) #define C4IW_WR_TO (10*HZ) -enum { - REPLY_READY = 0, -}; - struct c4iw_wr_wait { - wait_queue_head_t wait; - unsigned long status; + struct completion completion; int ret; }; static inline void c4iw_init_wr_wait(struct c4iw_wr_wait *wr_waitp) { wr_waitp->ret = 0; - wr_waitp->status = 0; - init_waitqueue_head(&wr_waitp->wait); + init_completion(&wr_waitp->completion); } static inline void c4iw_wake_up(struct c4iw_wr_wait *wr_waitp, int ret) { wr_waitp->ret = ret; - set_bit(REPLY_READY, &wr_waitp->status); - wake_up(&wr_waitp->wait); + complete(&wr_waitp->completion); } static inline int c4iw_wait_for_reply(struct c4iw_rdev *rdev, @@ -164,8 +157,7 @@ static inline int c4iw_wait_for_reply(struct c4iw_rdev *rdev, int ret; do { - ret = wait_event_timeout(wr_waitp->wait, - test_and_clear_bit(REPLY_READY, &wr_waitp->status), to); + ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&wr_waitp->completion, to); if (!ret) { printk(KERN_ERR MOD "%s - Device %s not responding - " "tid %u qpid %u\n", func, -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b