From a5c83eb2bdc35af7fc7947fadf6e740a5792f08e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 11:54:57 +0200 Subject: mmc: tifm_sd: Mark expected switch fall-through In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "deliberate fall-through" comment with a proper "fall through" at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373887 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson --- drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/mmc') diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c index a3d8380ab480..b6644ce296b2 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tifm_sd.c @@ -336,7 +336,8 @@ static unsigned int tifm_sd_op_flags(struct mmc_command *cmd) rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_R0; break; case MMC_RSP_R1B: - rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_BUSY; // deliberate fall-through + rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_BUSY; + /* fall-through */ case MMC_RSP_R1: rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_R1; break; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b