From d72bade76d11da661d76aec5801567d573f39fea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mika Westerberg Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:48:40 +0300 Subject: smb347-charger: Move IRQ enabling to the end of probe There is a potential problem if we call smb347_irq_enable() from smb347_irq_init() because smb347_irq_enable() makes the device registers read-only once it returns and smb347_irq_init() expects them to still be read-write. Currently no harm happens because it is the last call we make in smb347_irq_init(). Anyway a better place for enabling IRQs is at the end of probe function and this is also symmetric to call smb347_irq_disable() which is done at the beginning of remove function. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov --- drivers/power/smb347-charger.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/power/smb347-charger.c') diff --git a/drivers/power/smb347-charger.c b/drivers/power/smb347-charger.c index 18d53748e66d..de6898f5d166 100644 --- a/drivers/power/smb347-charger.c +++ b/drivers/power/smb347-charger.c @@ -925,10 +925,6 @@ static int smb347_irq_init(struct smb347_charger *smb) if (ret < 0) goto fail_readonly; - ret = smb347_irq_enable(smb); - if (ret < 0) - goto fail_readonly; - smb347_set_writable(smb, false); smb->client->irq = irq; return 0; @@ -1241,6 +1237,8 @@ static int smb347_probe(struct i2c_client *client, if (ret < 0) { dev_warn(dev, "failed to initialize IRQ: %d\n", ret); dev_warn(dev, "disabling IRQ support\n"); + } else { + smb347_irq_enable(smb); } } -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b