From c5a69d57eb48e36f84c0737b5b24ec277d7dbfba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tobias Klauser Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:11:19 +0100 Subject: Storage class should be before const qualifier The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5: The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent feature. Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk --- drivers/scsi/arm/eesox.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/scsi/arm/eesox.c') diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/eesox.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/eesox.c index 4677152142d9..d4136524fc46 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/arm/eesox.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/eesox.c @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void eesoxscsi_buffer_in(void *buf, int length, void __iomem *base) const void __iomem *reg_fas = base + EESOX_FAS216_OFFSET; const void __iomem *reg_dmastat = base + EESOX_DMASTAT; const void __iomem *reg_dmadata = base + EESOX_DMADATA; - const register unsigned long mask = 0xffff; + register const unsigned long mask = 0xffff; do { unsigned int status; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b