From 86eaf4a5b4312bea8676fb79399d9e08b53d8e71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robin Murphy Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:42:04 +0100 Subject: thunderbolt: Make iommu_dma_protection more accurate Between me trying to get rid of iommu_present() and Mario wanting to support the AMD equivalent of DMAR_PLATFORM_OPT_IN, scrutiny has shown that the iommu_dma_protection attribute is being far too optimistic. Even if an IOMMU might be present for some PCI segment in the system, that doesn't necessarily mean it provides translation for the device(s) we care about. Furthermore, all that DMAR_PLATFORM_OPT_IN really does is tell us that memory was protected before the kernel was loaded, and prevent the user from disabling the intel-iommu driver entirely. While that lets us assume kernel integrity, what matters for actual runtime DMA protection is whether we trust individual devices, based on the "external facing" property that we expect firmware to describe for Thunderbolt ports. It's proven challenging to determine the appropriate ports accurately given the variety of possible topologies, so while still not getting a perfect answer, by putting enough faith in firmware we can at least get a good bit closer. If we can see that any device near a Thunderbolt NHI has all the requisites for Kernel DMA Protection, chances are that it *is* a relevant port, but moreover that implies that firmware is playing the game overall, so we'll use that to assume that all Thunderbolt ports should be correctly marked and thus will end up fully protected. CC: Mario Limonciello Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Acked-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b153f208bc9eafab5105bad0358b77366509d2d4.1650878781.git.robin.murphy@arm.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel --- drivers/thunderbolt/domain.c | 12 +++--------- drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/thunderbolt') diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/domain.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/domain.c index 7018d959f775..2889a214dadc 100644 --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/domain.c +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/domain.c @@ -7,9 +7,7 @@ */ #include -#include #include -#include #include #include #include @@ -257,13 +255,9 @@ static ssize_t iommu_dma_protection_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { - /* - * Kernel DMA protection is a feature where Thunderbolt security is - * handled natively using IOMMU. It is enabled when IOMMU is - * enabled and ACPI DMAR table has DMAR_PLATFORM_OPT_IN set. - */ - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", - iommu_present(&pci_bus_type) && dmar_platform_optin()); + struct tb *tb = container_of(dev, struct tb, dev); + + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", tb->nhi->iommu_dma_protection); } static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(iommu_dma_protection); diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c index 4a582183f675..4bc87b0f003a 100644 --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c @@ -15,9 +15,11 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include +#include #include "nhi.h" #include "nhi_regs.h" @@ -1103,6 +1105,47 @@ static void nhi_check_quirks(struct tb_nhi *nhi) nhi->quirks |= QUIRK_AUTO_CLEAR_INT; } +static int nhi_check_iommu_pdev(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data) +{ + if (!pdev->external_facing || + !device_iommu_capable(&pdev->dev, IOMMU_CAP_PRE_BOOT_PROTECTION)) + return 0; + *(bool *)data = true; + return 1; /* Stop walking */ +} + +static void nhi_check_iommu(struct tb_nhi *nhi) +{ + struct pci_bus *bus = nhi->pdev->bus; + bool port_ok = false; + + /* + * Ideally what we'd do here is grab every PCI device that + * represents a tunnelling adapter for this NHI and check their + * status directly, but unfortunately USB4 seems to make it + * obnoxiously difficult to reliably make any correlation. + * + * So for now we'll have to bodge it... Hoping that the system + * is at least sane enough that an adapter is in the same PCI + * segment as its NHI, if we can find *something* on that segment + * which meets the requirements for Kernel DMA Protection, we'll + * take that to imply that firmware is aware and has (hopefully) + * done the right thing in general. We need to know that the PCI + * layer has seen the ExternalFacingPort property which will then + * inform the IOMMU layer to enforce the complete "untrusted DMA" + * flow, but also that the IOMMU driver itself can be trusted not + * to have been subverted by a pre-boot DMA attack. + */ + while (bus->parent) + bus = bus->parent; + + pci_walk_bus(bus, nhi_check_iommu_pdev, &port_ok); + + nhi->iommu_dma_protection = port_ok; + dev_dbg(&nhi->pdev->dev, "IOMMU DMA protection is %s\n", + str_enabled_disabled(port_ok)); +} + static int nhi_init_msi(struct tb_nhi *nhi) { struct pci_dev *pdev = nhi->pdev; @@ -1220,6 +1263,7 @@ static int nhi_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id) return -ENOMEM; nhi_check_quirks(nhi); + nhi_check_iommu(nhi); res = nhi_init_msi(nhi); if (res) { -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b