From 708a62bcd5f699756bae81491e64648fbf19e2a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rudolf Marek Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:59:42 +0200 Subject: hwmon: (coretemp) Fix Atom CPUs support Fix Atom CPUs support. Intel documents TjMax at 90 degrees C but some Atoms may have 125 degrees C (this is undocumented speculation). Signed-off-by: Rudolf Marek Cc: Huaxu Wan Cc: Kent Liu Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare --- drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 6 +++--- drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig index 9d881f708912..6857560144bd 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig @@ -373,12 +373,12 @@ config SENSORS_GL520SM will be called gl520sm. config SENSORS_CORETEMP - tristate "Intel Core (2) Duo/Solo temperature sensor" + tristate "Intel Core/Core2/Atom temperature sensor" depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL help If you say yes here you get support for the temperature - sensor inside your CPU. Supported all are all known variants - of Intel Core family. + sensor inside your CPU. Most of the family 6 CPUs + are supported. Check documentation/driver for details. config SENSORS_IBMAEM tristate "IBM Active Energy Manager temperature/power sensors and control" diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c index 972cf4ba963c..4c15ed7eb786 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c @@ -157,17 +157,24 @@ static int __devinit adjust_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device * /* The 100C is default for both mobile and non mobile CPUs */ int tjmax = 100000; - int ismobile = 1; + int usemsr_ee = 1; int err; u32 eax, edx; /* Early chips have no MSR for TjMax */ if ((c->x86_model == 0xf) && (c->x86_mask < 4)) { - ismobile = 0; + usemsr_ee = 0; } - if ((c->x86_model > 0xe) && (ismobile)) { + /* Atoms seems to have TjMax at 90C */ + + if (c->x86_model == 0x1c) { + usemsr_ee = 0; + tjmax = 90000; + } + + if ((c->x86_model > 0xe) && (usemsr_ee)) { /* Now we can detect the mobile CPU using Intel provided table http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/Wiki/Mobility/720.htm @@ -179,13 +186,13 @@ static int __devinit adjust_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device * dev_warn(dev, "Unable to access MSR 0x17, assuming desktop" " CPU\n"); - ismobile = 0; + usemsr_ee = 0; } else if (!(eax & 0x10000000)) { - ismobile = 0; + usemsr_ee = 0; } } - if (ismobile || c->x86_model == 0x1c) { + if (usemsr_ee) { err = rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(id, 0xee, &eax, &edx); if (err) { @@ -195,7 +202,9 @@ static int __devinit adjust_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device * } else if (eax & 0x40000000) { tjmax = 85000; } - } else { + /* if we dont use msr EE it means we are desktop CPU (with exeception + of Atom) */ + } else if (tjmax == 100000) { dev_warn(dev, "Using relative temperature scale!\n"); } @@ -248,9 +257,9 @@ static int __devinit coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data); /* read the still undocumented IA32_TEMPERATURE_TARGET it exists - on older CPUs but not in this register */ + on older CPUs but not in this register, Atoms don't have it either */ - if (c->x86_model > 0xe) { + if ((c->x86_model > 0xe) && (c->x86_model != 0x1c)) { err = rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(data->id, 0x1a2, &eax, &edx); if (err) { dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Unable to read" @@ -413,7 +422,7 @@ static int __init coretemp_init(void) for_each_online_cpu(i) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i); - /* check if family 6, models 0xe, 0xf, 0x16, 0x17, 0x1A */ + /* check if family 6, models 0xe, 0xf, 0x16, 0x17, 0x1A, 0x1c */ if ((c->cpuid_level < 0) || (c->x86 != 0x6) || !((c->x86_model == 0xe) || (c->x86_model == 0xf) || (c->x86_model == 0x16) || (c->x86_model == 0x17) || -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b