From bd8a1b12907e314c3630c18da2bc0a07f5ae72e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Don Skidmore Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:35:50 +0000 Subject: ixgbe: fix incorrect limit value in ring transverse We were transversing the tx_ring with IXGBE_NUM_RX_QUEUES. Now this define happens to have the correct value but this is misleading and a change later could easily make this no longer true. I updated it to netdev->num_tx_queues like we use in ixgbe_get_strings(). Signed-off-by: Don Skidmore Tested-by: Phil Schmitt Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c index 50c1e9b2fd80..db0dbf668b14 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c @@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ static void ixgbe_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *netdev, data[i] = (ixgbe_gstrings_stats[i].sizeof_stat == sizeof(u64)) ? *(u64 *)p : *(u32 *)p; } - for (j = 0; j < IXGBE_NUM_RX_QUEUES; j++) { + for (j = 0; j < netdev->num_tx_queues; j++) { ring = adapter->tx_ring[j]; if (!ring) { data[i] = 0; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b