From 3284da7b7b585e6e8e98f374a51d234d14c7a0a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:47:32 +0100 Subject: btrfs: use explicit initializer for seq_elem Using {} as initializer for struct seq_elem does not properly initialize the list_head member, but it currently works because it gets set through btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq if 'seq' is 0. Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ctree.h') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index b3dd55f52f71..36e009ebab47 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h @@ -1328,6 +1328,8 @@ struct seq_list { u64 seq; }; +#define SEQ_LIST_INIT(name) { .list = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).list), .seq = 0 } + enum btrfs_orphan_cleanup_state { ORPHAN_CLEANUP_STARTED = 1, ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE = 2, -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b