From 385de0ef387dc7f33fc5b828136cbc9516b3ec1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:43:11 +0200 Subject: btrfs: use a normal workqueue for rmw_workers rmw_workers doesn't need ordered execution or thread disabling threshold (as the thresh parameter is less than DFT_THRESHOLD). Just switch to the normal workqueues that use a lot less resources, especially in the work_struct vs btrfs_work structures. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ctree.h') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index 6097166e39b6..f55b15437602 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h @@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info { struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_workers; struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_meta_workers; struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_raid56_workers; - struct btrfs_workqueue *rmw_workers; + struct workqueue_struct *rmw_workers; struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_meta_write_workers; struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_write_workers; struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_freespace_worker; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b