From e43bbe5e16d87b40f3b382b3a43b0142d6d1193d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:43:52 +0100 Subject: btrfs: sink unlock_extent parameter gfp_flags All callers pass either GFP_NOFS or GFP_KERNEL now, so we can sink the parameter to the function, though we lose some of the slightly better semantics of GFP_KERNEL in some places, it's worth cleaning up the callchains. Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/scrub.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index d766c73eb29a..ecfe3118d9dd 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -4468,8 +4468,7 @@ static int check_extent_to_block(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 len, free_extent_map(em); out_unlock: - unlock_extent_cached(io_tree, lockstart, lockend, &cached_state, - GFP_NOFS); + unlock_extent_cached(io_tree, lockstart, lockend, &cached_state); return ret; } -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b