From 61a6cb49da8147bc5377b60dfe540f9ef320aeb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Biggers Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 12:04:42 -0600 Subject: ext4: remove obsolete comment from ext4_can_extents_be_merged() Support for unwritten extents was added to ext4 a long time ago, so remove a misleading comment that says they're a future feature. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191231180444.46586-7-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/ext4') diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index 6e4d8a5cb7fb..6a8faa86d45f 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -1716,11 +1716,6 @@ static int ext4_can_extents_be_merged(struct inode *inode, le32_to_cpu(ex2->ee_block)) return 0; - /* - * To allow future support for preallocated extents to be added - * as an RO_COMPAT feature, refuse to merge to extents if - * this can result in the top bit of ee_len being set. - */ if (ext1_ee_len + ext2_ee_len > EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN) return 0; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b