From e03b07d9084d03e896b7f1a598a7f6aa18f6eeda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaegeuk Kim Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:38:20 -0700 Subject: f2fs: do not recover wrong data index During the roll-forward recovery, if we found a new data index written fsync lastly, we need to recover new block address. But, if that address was corrupted, we should not recover that. Otherwise, f2fs gets kernel panic from: In check_index_in_prev_nodes(), sentry = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno); --------------------------> out-of-range segno. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/f2fs/recovery.c') diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c index 63b720bd7e75..4b742c96c223 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c @@ -395,7 +395,9 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, src = datablock_addr(dn.node_page, dn.ofs_in_node); dest = datablock_addr(page, dn.ofs_in_node); - if (src != dest && dest != NEW_ADDR && dest != NULL_ADDR) { + if (src != dest && dest != NEW_ADDR && dest != NULL_ADDR && + dest >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) && dest < MAX_BLKADDR(sbi)) { + if (src == NULL_ADDR) { err = reserve_new_block(&dn); /* We should not get -ENOSPC */ -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b